tkirton
Member
I beg to differ about the thread. The op opened it up to stir up trouble...the leaked rom is technically "unreleased" (meaning Acer didn't release it officially). So long as Acer hasn't authorized a release, they don't have to distribute source to it.
The conversation wasn't getting good...most people was nailing the OP for trolling since they felt the OP was trying to distract from the development of the leaked rom. The moderator closed it because the thread was getting out of control (which always seems to happen when you mention Thor, his work, or the GPL).
But, as I pointed out right before the thread closed, you can go further and state that all roms that aren't part of AOSP (meaning all Acer roms) are in violation of the GPL because there is no source code posted for programs such as Bluez, DBus, WPA-Supplicant, and other GPLv2 licensed programs. Can you imagine 85% or more of the Android roms on XDA being pulled for non-GPL compliance? That would be devastating for XDA. The point I was trying to make over there is that either we can pull every rom off of XDA, or we can just end this conversation and move on with developing.
The problem I've seen on the Acer A500 XDA forum is that you have a handful of people who whine a lot about whether a rom developer is sharing. None of those people will grab the source from CyanogenMod 9's github and actually perform the process of building a GPL compliant rom. They just continuously whine about it and, frankly, it's getting rather annoying.
The conversation wasn't getting good...most people was nailing the OP for trolling since they felt the OP was trying to distract from the development of the leaked rom. The moderator closed it because the thread was getting out of control (which always seems to happen when you mention Thor, his work, or the GPL).
But, as I pointed out right before the thread closed, you can go further and state that all roms that aren't part of AOSP (meaning all Acer roms) are in violation of the GPL because there is no source code posted for programs such as Bluez, DBus, WPA-Supplicant, and other GPLv2 licensed programs. Can you imagine 85% or more of the Android roms on XDA being pulled for non-GPL compliance? That would be devastating for XDA. The point I was trying to make over there is that either we can pull every rom off of XDA, or we can just end this conversation and move on with developing.
The problem I've seen on the Acer A500 XDA forum is that you have a handful of people who whine a lot about whether a rom developer is sharing. None of those people will grab the source from CyanogenMod 9's github and actually perform the process of building a GPL compliant rom. They just continuously whine about it and, frankly, it's getting rather annoying.