The article i read on Engadget wasn't well enough researched. They were basing it off a poorly written (now corrected) review on anandtech.
The Anandtech review is the best written, most thorough review to date. It did contain the factual error about the lack of GPS, which Anand himself corrected by contacting Asus.
Engadget, on the other hand, not only decided to take Anandtech's initial error and post a headline story about the Transformer lacking GPS, but they claimed that Asus "contradicted themselves" by listing GPS on their official spec page. Then they
removed the article within a couple of hours instead of just updating it.
This was after writing a truly poorly written review of the Transformer, which claimed that the trackpad lacked multitouch--then amended it after claiming that a software update "fixed" the problem--despite that there are several videos on YouTube, even as far back as CES, demonstrating multitouch in action (I linked to an Italian tech blog's video in another thread). The review also claimed that the USB port functionality was inconsistent, despite the fact that hands-on videos on AC and Netbookreviews.net show the USB ports working without a hitch. Unlike Anandtech, which included video rundown tests of battery life measurements, Engadget's half-ass review simply avoided the issue of battery life by stating "we were unable to test the battery life".