Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Eclipse2K
  1. Thread Author  Thread Author    #1  

    Default

    So on I will use some rather than many threads I have came across mention build quality.

    Whilst Samsung gets a bit of flack for the use of plastic materials oh wait don't the Majority and then on the flip side praise is given to the moto x and the HTC one.

    Whilst I like to have to have a phone that has that premium look and feel especially when your paying a high price to obtain.

    At this point its a ridiculous argument as most make phones from plastic other than the HTC One so my question is why Samsung bares the bullseye?

    Oh I'm not a fanboy and get the argument on touchwiz its a heavy overlay and although I experienced very little lag on any of the Samsung range I have used after now acquiring the Nexus 5 you do notice that its not quite as smooth.

    So seeing as the majority of phones are of plastic build let's shed some light as to which company makes the best use of the material.

    Posted via Android Central App
  2. #2  
    Darth Spock's Avatar

    Posts
    5,704 Posts
    Global Posts
    5,743 Global Posts
    ROM
    Assassin 'Droid

    Default Re: Build Qualities

    First, it's important to distinguish between build quality and build materials. Most people conflate the two and then you get confusing arguments like the one you're trying to puzzle out. Then, within build quality, we have aesthetics, the look and feel of the device - which includes balance, proportion, etc, as well as the obvious engineering integrity of components and how they are pieced together - and does the respective placement of the components make sense, enhancing the user's ability to smoothly utilize the device.

    So, if you want to talk about build quality, it's a huge design discussion that is had at a level that most users don't want to get into. If all we're concerned about is who is using the best materials, then it's simply a matter of: best at what? Durability? The way it looks? The way it feels in your hand? The most/least likely to slip out of your hand, off your counter, etc?

    Most of Moto's praise in the materials/quality discussion is going to boil down to ergonomics and the way the materials feel. The Moto X isn't that unique in how it looks (it's basically a boxed out galaxy nexus or nexus 4 from the front of it), but the way it is designed makes it a pleasure to hold, when compared to other modern flagships. Conversely, the Moto Droid Ultra is essentially the same device with different buttons on it, and it doesn't feel nearly as good. Soft curves, great balance, the soft-touch plastic and tiny bezels that make 1 handed use a breeze are the design characteristics of the Moto X.

    The HTC One is fairly great looking, people appreciate the material choice for it's perceived sturdiness, attractiveness and some other great ideas, such as slimmed bezels and front facing speakers, however other decisions, such as the placement and quality of the power button (atop so it can hide an IR blaster) created many frustrated would be buyers. "Loose" buttons seem to be a major turnoff as well. Still, the build materials choice, different design direction & a compelling update to Sense made it the only realistic challenger to the Nexus 4 for many a nerd until late Summer.

    Samsung doesn't get enough credit for what they do in the materials and engineering categories, however what they do isn't evolving as quickly or drastically as other OEM's and so the response of "yawn" get translated sometimes as "eww". Touchwiz and the buttons are my biggest complaints against Samsung, however in the materials category, shiny plastic is not as "attractive" to most users, despite the fact that the plastic they use is pretty high quality in the durability category. The two biggest build quality complaints against Samsung, as far as I can tell from the forums, are the fact that the design does very little to protect the screen and charging ports that are very loose and prone to requiring replacement. As these are both things one wouldn't notice in the store, it's frustrating to purchase the device and to be required to return it due to mission critical things that don't work.

    Overall, plastic is a fine materials choice and of course we're going to see it's use continue so long as it's one of the cheapest, easiest to manipulate and more durable materials available. The trick to nerd acceptance seems to be a combination of shaping, texture and appearance. My conjecture is that if Samsung's next Galaxy was the soft-touch we've experienced with the Moto X and Nexus lines, a lot of the "cheap plastic" argument goes away. Then we can put pressure on them to fix the things that matter, that horrible UI and the ridiculous buttons on the front.

    ​Obvious statement: Why, I am an assassin 'droid, Master.
    May the Force Be With You

    Community Rules & Guidelines​
    (Formerly "NothingIsTrue")

    Thanked by:
  3. #3  

    Default Re: Build Qualities

    NothingisTrue hit it right on the head. Motorola is praised for their superb build quality even when it comes to the Droid Maxx. While I would agree that Motorola uses premium materials it doesn't mean it's built well. The Droid RAZR Maxx HD was built like a tank with no creaks or movement. The successor to that device, the Droid Maxx, is honestly built horribly. I returned one a day later for horrific popping of the non removable Kevlar backing. The next one was fine until a month later when it began to pop again. The two replacements, sent back for different reasons (I had signal drops), also had creaking right out the box.

    The Galaxy Note 2 did have cheap plastic materials and a cheap build quality. This didn't take away from what was an excellent device but I'm easily annoyed by creaks and panels that have a popping feel to them. I dealt with it though. The Galaxy Note 3, while plastic, is far better. The back cover is still thin but it doesn't pop at all. The bezel around the sides is solid with no movement. Plastic? Yes, but being plastic isn't necessarily a bad thing is designed properly. I'll take a plastic device that feels solid over a Kevlar device that pops so loud that a person across the room would hear it.

    Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Verizon)
    Thanked by:
    Darth Spock likes this.
  4. #4  

    Default Re: Build Qualities

    I did held the HTC One but I don't think it's the most durable though better than the typical plastic phones from Samsung and recently LG. There were reports of build quality issues.

    Plastic do have its benefits and durability points though. More flexible, lighter and cheaper to replace.

    Oppo probably make the most durable phones for now.

    One thing I'm annoyed by is people getting wrapped up with Gorilla glass, nothing special, try searching YouTube for drop tests, if you drop them it'll break. I still find the glass from the original Galaxy S more durable, but it's due to the obsession with thin phones.

    sent via tapatalk

Similar Threads

  1. High quality voice prompt
    By cb2367 in forum Sprint Galaxy S3
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-02-2014, 06:53 PM
  2. Build quality on Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 :( SOS
    By Astronomer cykiller in forum Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-30-2014, 05:21 PM
  3. Question on build quality and durability
    By skirush2014 in forum Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-29-2014, 10:03 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-28-2014, 04:03 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-23-2014, 01:46 PM

Posting Permissions

B