Welcome to the Android Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. Thread Author  Thread Author    #1  
    kinster02's Avatar

    Posts
    1,035 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,672 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Evo's #1 in the Znet poll with Android leading the charge.

  2. #2  
    RETG's Avatar

    Posts
    279 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    But, would EVO be number one if it was not capable of 4G? The reviewer does note, "specifications, features, services, and capability..." Or, would there be a three-way tie for 1st place?
  3. #3  
    ReallyShawn's Avatar

    Posts
    5 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Interesting. Would the number 2 phones be number 700 if they had no 3G? Also interesting.

    Quote Originally Posted by RETG View Post
    But, would EVO be number one if it was not capable of 4G? The reviewer does note, "specifications, features, services, and capability..." Or, would there be a three-way tie for 1st place?


    Sent from my HTC Evo using Tapatalk
  4. #4  
    Palm-a-PREciation's Avatar

    Posts
    46 Posts
    Global Posts
    100 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well, got to take the ratings with a grain of salt, he put the Palm Pre 2 above the Samsung Epic.....I currently own the Palm Pre, and even with it upgraded to what the Palm Pre 2 will be, it still doesn't compete against what the Samsung Epic offers!!

    (Not to say that the Evo doesn't deserve top ratings, I honestly think that the Evo is pretty much equivalent to the Epic, it just depends on personal preference.....but I'm sure the Epic will be a much better phone than the Palm Pre 2!!!)
  5. #5  
    f1nzup's Avatar

    Posts
    260 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RETG View Post
    But, would EVO be number one if it was not capable of 4G? The reviewer does note, "specifications, features, services, and capability..." Or, would there be a three-way tie for 1st place?
    Not a legitimate question, because it IS capable of 4G. That would be like asking if the iphone 4 would be number 3 if it wasn't made by apple? It is a distinction it owns, and therefore is one more feature that makes it better than it's competitors.
  6. #6  
    Bujin#IM's Avatar

    Posts
    435 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,161 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by preexisting View Post
    Well, got to take the ratings with a grain of salt, he put the Palm Pre 2 above the Samsung Epic.....I currently own the Palm Pre, and even with it upgraded to what the Palm Pre 2 will be, it still doesn't compete against what the Samsung Epic offers!!
    Well, it ultimately is just an opinion piece; however, I think the author mostly wanted to give credit to the potential of the OS.
  7. #7  
    milominderbinde's Avatar

    Posts
    2,348 Posts
    Global Posts
    6,840 Global Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kinster02 View Post
    It is a very good article and 5 of the top 10 phones are Android. But notice the reader poll at the end: the Palm 2 is way out in front at this time...

Posting Permissions

";