I like The Verge, I really do. I think they bring a unique blog to the table and that it asks certain questions that other mainstream tech blogs couldn't care less about. Features like "The Classics" are very refreshing and welcomed. However, let's not forget who is at the helm of The Verge, and why the psychological irony of Utopian situations and Utopian product hyperbole comes together so well there. J Tops, will never - even if it baked pizza, say that Android or an Android device has surpassed iOS or any Apple product. He will begrudgingly say "almost, if not as good as something like...[pssssh, I dunno!] the iPhone," but never "better than." So understanding that leads me to the conclusion, that like any good Fanboy, whenever an awesome product launches from a competitors stable a dissonance takes over that causes these fanatics to start looking for any excuse to say "well, it falls way to short here and here and there."
But let's be real. VZW is overpriced. Everyone else's LTE has a negligible footprint. Hell, there are places where Sprint has launched and now claims "coverage" where only two blocks are receiving signal (per forum complaints - in KC I believe). HSPA+ is, in my estimation the most harmonious balance between great speeds (especially for a smartphone, I mean c'mon) coverage, battery life and availability. Plus it cuts those two year strings that some of us have been tethered too (don't let them find out
) for 2,4,6...10 or more years even.
If you want to embrace what Nexus is, what it can mean for our wireless future, the absence of LTE is a "that's odd" moment, until you really consider it. Aren't the LTE standards in the US really just setting us all up another decade of carrier exclusivity, and regional monopolization? Which network has an LTE frequency that is compatible with another? It's the CDMA/GSM bumblecluster all over again. And it's pretty damned anti-consumer at it's core.
But that's me, and I'm a me fanboy, so ... haha, ya know it's just like my opinion man.