- 11-02-2012, 03:40 PM
Thread Author #1
- 11-02-2012, 04:03 PM #2
- 11-02-2012, 07:22 PM #3
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
No LTE is going to be the dealbreaker for the mainstream.
a.k.a. RyZR from HoFo
Motorola DROID Bionic (98.72.22.XT865.Verizon.en.US, Jelly Bean 4.1.2)
Google Nexus 7 (JDQ39, Jelly Bean 4.2.2)
What other devices have I had? Here's my phone timeline.
Support your favorite Android app and game developers. Pay for apps! And don't block ads! - 11-02-2012, 07:30 PM #4
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
Read this review earlier. First all out gushing review I've seen all day. Most other reviews said it was a solid phone but had drawbacks such as spotty battery, some software glitches and the aforementioned lack of LTE seemed to really bug some reviewers. I always thought Topolsky was a huge Google fanboy but even his review was less than stellar.
I'm still getting this phone. :-)
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Android Central ForumsA proud former Nexus 4 Limbo level-2 member - 11-02-2012, 07:40 PM #5
Last edited by ChromeJob; 11-06-2012 at 06:38 PM.
Sent by accident, not using the Android Central app
Nexus 4 (Mako), Amaze 4G on T-Mobile. Nexus 7 16GB. Google Chromebook (2012 Samsung 16gb). Next stop, a Google flush toilet.
Did I solve your problem? Hit the Thanks button. Was I just a nuisance? Sorry, can't bat .400 every day. - 11-02-2012, 07:41 PM #6
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
I still don't get WHY LTE is a minus to the phone? Yes, we ALL know it doesn't have LTE and that will eliminate a large part of the cell phone consumer community on VZW/Sprint.
But the Nexus 4 shouldn't be dinged because of this. I want to know all the Pros/Cons of the phone ITSELF as it stands. Like battery, screen, Android 4.2, photosphere, speed, etc etc. These are the things that will affect ANYONE who actually buys the phone. Not having LTE just eliminates a part of the buyer market, has 0% to do with the phone.
Ugggg.. Please stop the stupid 'OMG THIS PHONE SUCKS BECAUSE IT HAS NO LTE". No it doesn't! Get a GSM carrier, not the f-ing phone's fault!Thanked by 3: - 11-02-2012, 07:43 PM #7
- 11-02-2012, 08:02 PM #8
- 11-02-2012, 08:04 PM #9
- 11-02-2012, 08:18 PM #10a.k.a. RyZR from HoFo
Motorola DROID Bionic (98.72.22.XT865.Verizon.en.US, Jelly Bean 4.1.2)
Google Nexus 7 (JDQ39, Jelly Bean 4.2.2)
What other devices have I had? Here's my phone timeline.
Support your favorite Android app and game developers. Pay for apps! And don't block ads! - 11-02-2012, 08:21 PM #11- Kevin Bacon is my bananas.
Thanked by: - 11-02-2012, 08:21 PM #12
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
No LTE is a big issue.
However, since I am now on T-mobile, it's not a dealbreaker for me. I am still debating if I get it. I am happy with my current budget Android smartphone but I may sell that and a few other phones to get this if I still decide to buy it.TOSHIBA Thrive • Pio's Team Baked BlackBean 4.1.2 ROM
Samsung Galaxy Note 1 (i717) • Padawan JB 4.1.2 or The Collective AOCP ROM CP 5.7 (4.2.2)
HTC AMAZE 4G • Speed ROM 9.0 Beta 1
HTC EVO 4G • Deck's Reloaded ROM
Samsung Galaxy NEXUS • JB Sourcery ROM
B&N Nook Color (Gifted to relative)
Samsung Galaxy Prevail • Half A$$ed ROM
EVO Shift• JellyBelly ROM - 11-02-2012, 08:25 PM #13
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
True, it is a "con" in that it doesn't have/work on the LTE VZW market, but I guess I feel that's not a fault of the phone, it's Google deciding not to do it. Like I mentioned, I want to know more of the good/bad aspects of the phone itself, which LTE doesn't matter.
I guess I would classify it as a "drawback" because of Google's no LTE offering, not because of the Nexus 4 phone. - 11-02-2012, 08:26 PM #14
- 11-02-2012, 09:25 PM #15
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
No LTE is a fact that should be mentioned. But it's in no way a 'con' for the phone, anymore than not having, say, a built-in AM/FM radio would be a con. You can ding the phone for not having a function through error or oversight; you can't when not having that function was a conscious decision.
- 11-04-2012, 02:15 AM #16
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
No LTE option is a definite con.
- Three of the big four constantly promoting their next gen networks as the best user experience, with the fourth moving to that same place
- Phones like the iPhone 4S got dinged last year for not having an LTE option
- The previous generation of the Nexus smartphone had an LTE option
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Android Central Forumsa.k.a. RyZR from HoFo
Motorola DROID Bionic (98.72.22.XT865.Verizon.en.US, Jelly Bean 4.1.2)
Google Nexus 7 (JDQ39, Jelly Bean 4.2.2)
What other devices have I had? Here's my phone timeline.
Support your favorite Android app and game developers. Pay for apps! And don't block ads! - 11-04-2012, 02:21 AM #17
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
My phone doesn't do my homework, spit out rainbows, or do my chores for me. This is going back immediately.
In all seriousness though, LTE isn't really a con to those who don't even have it in their area. I would be such folk. Although I'm holding my breath for it, WiFi at home is plenty fast, and HSPA+ at school covers my needs well.
Sent from my HTC One X
Thanked by: - 11-04-2012, 03:36 AM #18
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
Depends on the country. Here in Germany, you can use the iPhone 5's LTE only on 1 of 4 carriers and only in bigger towns. Everything else is a different frequency.
- 11-04-2012, 04:44 AM #19
- 11-04-2012, 05:11 AM #20
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
- 11-04-2012, 06:05 AM #21
- 11-04-2012, 06:20 AM #22
- 11-04-2012, 06:33 AM #23
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
I know they do it for the average consumer but, I'm starting to wish all these revievers didn't get their hands on it first before everyone else. I've found many times that I like a device a lot more than than some of the reviewers and, sometime I know more about the phone than they do. If you have the chance, It's always bettter to try the product out for yourself IMO.
Stay tuned for my review LOL!Last edited by qnet; 11-05-2012 at 01:06 PM.
- 11-04-2012, 07:01 AM #24
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
I find that some reviewers may not rly know how to work Android as well as they should. But tbh I feel actually rly good about these reviews and I actually don't see many negatives that apply to me. Sure they keep mentioning LTE being an issue but why do I care about that? Its something they certainly should be saying, perhaps not a half hour long podcast saying NO LTE AHHHHHH, but its something that a regular consumer might use to go out.
The other problem I have with the reviews is they don't seem to have many comparisons other than the negatives. I mean they say "This phone can't be compared to an iPhone because the iPhone has LTE".....Rly the only thing to compare is their cellular radios?
To me it seems like some reviewers are grasping at straws to find something wrong with this phone. Maybe its my fanboy eyes looking at it that way....But one reviewer said that they want something like a lightning cable because the micro usb is too annoying and difficult? Idr his exact words. But most of the review had some great things to say about it, he simply just had small minor "personal" problems that he didn't like. This likely stems from using an iPhone as a daily driver.
I won't be shouting bias review at every reviewer because its likely they are just reporting what issues they are having. But the reader needs to keep these things into context. Not everybody will be keeping their screen on for 4.5 hours at a time. Battery life will get better as it charges more, they have had it for 3 days or so before they wrote the article. Whats important is the battery number and by that I'd say almost certainly I'll get as much out of this as I did of my S3. Which was plenty.
What I'm taking out of the reviews is this phone is at face value. Its a great phone if you understand and can live with what the limitations are while you look at it. The storage, LTE, glass housing, etc.
I'm actually hoping they will start reviewing this thing as a T-Mobile phone since that is the network it'll be available to purchase on. At least compare it to other T-Mo offerings and since they have no LTE, they can shutup about that comparison.- Kevin Bacon is my bananas.
Thanked by: - 11-04-2012, 11:48 AM #25
Re: Wired's Review - "Rating: 9/10 Nearly flawless; buy it now"
The mainstream doesn't care. No one looks at the 4G icon at the top of their GSM Galaxy S3 or iPhone 5 and says "this is actually HSPA+, not LTE" No, they simply call it "4G"
- You're right, that's what probably led to the poor sales and lack of user satisfaction from the 4 and 4S, oh wait.....
- I have a Galaxy Nexus, and my battery life is atrocious. Having LTE doesn't make me feel any better about that. I would kill just to be average at this point, and I know several users who fall in the "mainstream" category who feel precisely the same
As always, the uber tech crowd is severely miscalculating the focus of the average smartphone user.Back to Big Red. Sprint was tooooo slow
Click my Twitter | Galaxy Note 2
Similar Threads
-
Wired Game Review
By themikishow in forum GamesReplies: 0Last Post: 10-08-2012, 03:04 PM -
NEAR PERFECT BOLT! It's all a matter of trial and error!
By wallyweaver in forum Verizon HTC ThunderboltReplies: 27Last Post: 05-08-2011, 08:05 PM -
New game "180" buy it $2 or play Free with ads. After 10 hrs of play, ads remove!
By Ron_HeadcaseGames in forum General News & DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 04-13-2011, 11:41 PM -
Anyone going to wait to buy it until there are reviews?
By flashpiti in forum Verizon HTC ThunderboltReplies: 60Last Post: 03-15-2011, 09:54 AM -
10 Things I can do now that I have Froyo on my Vibrant
By tleeford in forum T-Mobile Vibrant Rooting, ROMs, and HacksReplies: 13Last Post: 01-15-2011, 02:20 PM



Reply



































