Re: Has Google Stated If They Will Compensate Play Store Pre-orde
Wow, someone wasn't kidding that most of the threads should be merged since the same people are posting the same things across the forum board.
As much as some of you love quoting from wiki-related sites, I can't help but point out that you are basing your argument from popular opinion, not fact. There is a high chance that general assumption, or the "unspoken rule" is just that...an assumption.
The only thing I saw that was agreed upon, is that a pre-order gives you the assurance that you are one of the first people to get it. (this is where semantics comes in, you may not have to like it, but this is where Google seems to have seen it's position-Be warned, this is all just speculation, don't quote me for fact.)
-We are still in the "first batch". Google sees us as still "one of the first people to get the device", even if we didn't get it on the first day of release. Simply because Google hasn't yet shipped another batch of mass orders based on orders placed on July 13th or after. So it's possible that they can say "One of the first" might extend to a period of 1 week. Don't get me wrong, I'm not gong-ho about this interpretation, but it technically means Google didn't outright drop the ball. And if you look closely, that period of 1 week after the first day of release falls within the 2-3 week assurance that was initially given when one made a pre-order on June 27th.
Before all of you raise your pitchforks, and challenge me, tell me I'm dead wrong, that this is not the "first batch" anymore, please understand that I'm not crazy about it either, but I can see Google seems to present that all pre-orders; whether it be individual pre-orders or mass pre-orders from a retailer are in the same "first batch" - or Orders made on July 12th or earlier. Yes, it kinda messed up that the retailers got their pre-orders first, but logistically, it's a ton easier to send of 1000+ tablets to one address, then to send 1000 tablets to 1000 different addresses.
As I said before, technically, Google can say they kept to their word, but it's obvious they lost a lot of goodwill in the process. It's also quite obvious to Google now, that they ignored some good advice beforehand, and should approached things differently. No doubt they are aware of customers feeling burned, and hopefully they will extend some goodwill to them. Time will tell.
Sorry for the rant, but I guess I got caught up when I saw this thread hijacked, and couldn't help myself. (I can't seem to pull away from it)