Welcome to the Android Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!
Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. Thread Author  Thread Author    #1  

    Default Google Nexus Tablet from LG

    From Unwired View:
    According to Mobile-Review’s Eldar Murtazin, Google is indeed working on it’s own branded tablet, which is scheduled for release sometime in mid-summer or early fall. Upon release, this device will get the latest Android 3.x version of OS, which will become available to partners only after Google’s tablet is out. This time the hardware partner making the tablet for Google, is LG.
    The article also claims that pre-Honeycomb tablets won't be upgraded:
    There was also one more interesting quip about Android 3.0 in Eldar’s article. According to him, if a hardware partner releases the tablet on Android 2.x version of OS, as per licensing agreement for Android 3.0, they are not allowed to update Android 2.x tablets to 3.0 version.
  2. #2  
    Jalarm's Avatar

    Posts
    808 Posts
    Global Posts
    810 Global Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default

    I predicted this...Next Nexus would be a tablet, it makes sense, and I think it's a good idea for Google to do.
    Devices Past to Present
    • Blackberry Bold 9000
    • HTC Aria
    • Samsung Captivate
    • Google Nexus S
    • Moto Xoom
  3. #3  
    ls377's Avatar

    Posts
    1,594 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,596 Global Posts
    ROM
    Teamhacksung's ICS

    Default

    I don't believe the second part. HTC said the Flyer would get Honeycomb, and I doubt they would go out on a limb like that without being sure.
  4. #4  
    EggoEspada's Avatar

    Posts
    753 Posts
    Global Posts
    807 Global Posts
    ROM
    Buglessbeast/Stock

    Default

    I like the second part actually (sorry guys). They aren't as capable and probably wouldn't be well optimized for Honeycomb. Though The HTC Flyer/EVO View should be able to just fine.
    So many phones, so little time.
  5. #5  
    ls377's Avatar

    Posts
    1,594 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,596 Global Posts
    ROM
    Teamhacksung's ICS

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EggoEspada View Post
    I like the second part actually (sorry guys). They aren't as capable and probably wouldn't be well optimized for Honeycomb. Though The HTC Flyer/EVO View should be able to just fine.
    I like it too, except for a few that could handle Honeycomb (Flyer, Streak 7, G Tab). I
  6. Thread Author  Thread Author    #6  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ls377 View Post
    I don't believe the second part. HTC said the Flyer would get Honeycomb, and I doubt they would go out on a limb like that without being sure.
    I've always taken "upgradable to [next version]" claims with a grain of salt. From day one, the Flyer/View was off my list when I saw that it wasn't shipping with Honeycomb. The people who buy it are the same people who complain about the Samsung phones they bought that shipped with Eclair.
  7. #7  

    Default

    The second part (if true) is the most anti open-source thing I've ever read, and the final reason for many to never buy, or support, an Android tablet.
    ಠ_ಠ
    제리
  8. #8  
    ls377's Avatar

    Posts
    1,594 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,596 Global Posts
    ROM
    Teamhacksung's ICS

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gameboy70 View Post
    I've always taken "upgradable to [next version]" claims with a grain of salt. From day one, the Flyer/View was off my list when I saw that it wasn't shipping with Honeycomb. The people who buy it are the same people who complain about the Samsung phones they bought that shipped with Eclair.
    The difference is, the Samsung phones got updated.

    Quote Originally Posted by gbhil View Post
    The second part (if true) is the most anti open-source thing I've ever read, and the final reason for many to never buy, or support, an Android tablet.
    This. I think its a lie, but it still scares me.
  9. #9  
    Jalarm's Avatar

    Posts
    808 Posts
    Global Posts
    810 Global Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default

    I don't see why a tablet at 2.X couldn't be updated.
    Devices Past to Present
    • Blackberry Bold 9000
    • HTC Aria
    • Samsung Captivate
    • Google Nexus S
    • Moto Xoom
  10. #10  

    Default

    Isn't the xoom the "Nexus tablet"?
  11. #11  
    quixoticelixer's Avatar

    Posts
    129 Posts
    Global Posts
    184 Global Posts
    ROM
    cm7 on N1 Rooted Atrix

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gbhil View Post
    The second part (if true) is the most anti open-source thing I've ever read, and the final reason for many to never buy, or support, an Android tablet.
    You are absolutely right. Google is cracking down.
  12. #12  
    TaeKwonDonkey's Avatar

    Posts
    307 Posts
    Global Posts
    419 Global Posts
    ROM
    CM7.1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RacecarBMW View Post
    Isn't the xoom the "Nexus tablet"?
    I see the Xoom like the OG Droid, it introduced another major step in vanilla Android but its not 100% Google.
    Siemens CF62T> Samsung T329 Stripe Black> MyTouch 3G Black (Android 1.6 Donut)> Blackberry Bold 9700 (5.0.0.330)> Samsung T219 Brown (backup crap dumbphone)> Google/HTC Nexus One (CM7.2)> Google/LG Nexus 4 (Android 4.2.2)
  13. #13  
    garfnodie's Avatar

    Posts
    50 Posts
    Global Posts
    53 Global Posts
    ROM
    CM9

    Default

    What software comes on a tablet matters not to me. I'll root it a.s.a.p. and put the latest OS on anyway. I'm more interested in the hardware inside. Right now I'm excited for the Samsung 10.1. I'll most likely sell my iPad for that.
    It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. --Cassis, John
  14. #14  

    Default

    a google nexus made by LG would be nice. at least im expecting lg to do a better job than what motorola did with their xoom. pretty excited for this one. pure android experience on a tab and fast updates, its possible that this nexus tab will have 3.1, probably a more finish and mature version of 3.0., XD.
  15. #15  
    Baconator's Avatar
    AC Adviser

    Posts
    1,024 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,021 Global Posts
    ROM
    Pure Google

    Default

    Now a Nexus Tab!? I was wanting the Galaxy Tab 10.1, but if this is true I might get this instead. It better be released soon because on June 8th that 10.1 will be mine.
  16. #16  

    Default

    Now this rumor just change my whole plans about buying an android tablet. It just sucks that it won't come any sooner, assuming its realy true.
  17. #17  
    DWR_31's Avatar

    Posts
    213 Posts
    Global Posts
    217 Global Posts

    Default

    There is good reason why this statement is probably true. Dual-Core processors are a requirement for Honeycomb.......Ah-ha......
  18. #18  
    tropper's Avatar
    Smarty Pants

    Posts
    827 Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default

    Google is just trying to shoot down Assles future yPad with LG's 3D tech, Google FTW.
    I dont necassarily believe google would lock it down that way, but if I am wrong this will be my last android phone, and I jump to windows an say F'em just on principle
    Im T rop per and I approve this message
    Thanks for watching = T
  19. #19  

    Default

    I thought the G-Slate was the "Nexus" tablet? It's made by LG and runs stock Honeycomb. It's just not called "Nexus Tablet"

    How much different can Google make it?
  20. #20  
    bb_batman_dcx's Avatar

    Posts
    220 Posts
    Global Posts
    239 Global Posts
    ROM
    CM 7.0.3.1 w/ LPP

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Miguel611 View Post
    I thought the G-Slate was the "Nexus" tablet? It's made by LG and runs stock Honeycomb. It's just not called "Nexus Tablet"

    How much different can Google make it?
    therefore its not the Nexus tablet stop trying to speculate "wasn't this the nexus tablet?" or "isn't that the nexus tablet?"

    if it has a model name already then its not a nexus tablet....the nexus 1 and nexus s didnt have code names...people knew them as the N1 or NS

    and to answer your second question, google pretty much asks LG to build the hardware whereas every once of software is Google's doing (i think...at least thats what i was brought to believe)
    ROM: CM 7.0.3.1 build
    Kernel: Tiamat 4.0.3 sbc
    Recovery: Amon_Ra v2.3


    "Speeding never killed anyone, its suddenly coming to a stop that will get you" -- Jeremy Clarkson

    If I helped you in anyway, please hit the "THANKS" button thats right over there >>

    [HL]Formally ndRoiD-haZr-329[/HL]
  21. Thread Author  Thread Author    #21  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RacecarBMW View Post
    Isn't the xoom the "Nexus tablet"?
    It's conspicuously not a Nexus branded tablet, why begs the question, "Why?" Evidently the Xoom is the G1 of tablets rather than the Nexus One. I think Google's trying to assert more control over their premier partners (Moto, Samsung, et al) by more stringent branding requirements, like which tablet gets knighted with the Nexus label, and which ones get the Powered by Google logo.

Posting Permissions