Results 1 to 19 of 19
Like Tree8Likes
  • 1 Post By doomstang
  • 2 Post By Phil Nickinson
  • 2 Post By themuffinman
  • 3 Post By elshagon
  1. Thread Author  Thread Author    #1  

    Default Sprint lte put on hold

    Just read this on inside sprint note
    from my HTC evo lte that was smuggled through customs in a kilo of cocaine
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Sprint lte put on hold-uploadfromtaptalk1339151981737.jpg  
  2. #2  
    Paul627g's Avatar

    Posts
    13,346 Posts
    Global Posts
    13,809 Global Posts
    ROM
    Milestone 1/Lean Kernel

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Let it be made clear this is in reference to the following markets.

    Atlanta, Dallas, Houston and San Antonio....

    I would do a bit more research into this before people start going nuts!
  3. #3  
    doomstang's Avatar

    Posts
    186 Posts
    ROM
    Viper ROM

    Default

    A text message was put on hold, not Sprints LTE network.

    Sent from my Evo 4G LTE using Tapatalk
    Thanked by:
    roflwaffleton likes this.
  4. #4  
    Phil Nickinson's Avatar
    Android Central Editor in Chief

    Posts
    3,332 Posts
    Global Posts
    3,438 Global Posts

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    And let's be clear -- Sprint itself has never announced a launch date -- just the first half of the year. A little bit of "inside" knowledge can be a dangerous thing.
    jayhay312 and 541rrhse like this.
  5. #5  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    And let's be clear-- I still don't have lte..but I do have my new evo lte and my chocolate muffins
  6. #6  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Let's also be clear--Those areas are in general. I live it the so called Atlanta area and have never had 4G for my original EVO, so I doubt I will ever see LTE either.

    Just my 2 Cents worth......
  7. #7  
    Scottyd's Avatar

    Posts
    9 Posts
    Global Posts
    17 Global Posts

    Default

    I live in the Atlanta area. And have had access to 4G with my OG EVO & EVO 3D. But it was spotty at best. And I never saw anything above 9mbs. Lets hope LTE is better.

    When ever they decide to turn it on that is.


    Sent from my EVO 4G LTE
  8. #8  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Quote Originally Posted by chocolate muffins View Post
    And let's be clear-- I still don't have lte..but I do have my new evo lte and my chocolate muffins
    Did sprint send you chocolate muffins instead of that blue case? You got a great deal, I would have much preferred a muffin if given the choice.
  9. #9  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Let this be clear-- I have been riding the lte waves for the last two days, I am on the southside of atlanta. Yeah, so no complaints from me. :

    Here are some screenshots from my gnex and my evo lte



    Thanked by:
    mech1164 and awileycoyote21 like this.
  10. #10  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Quote Originally Posted by chocolate muffins View Post
    And let's be clear-- I still don't have lte..but I do have my new evo lte and my chocolate muffins
    Quote Originally Posted by themuffinman View Post
    Let this be clear-- I have been riding the lte waves for the last two days, I am on the southside of atlanta. Yeah, so no complaints from me. :

    Here are some screenshots from my gnex and my evo lte



    Are you two related?
  11. #11  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Quote Originally Posted by elshagon View Post
    Are you two related?
    LOL, no relations.
  12. #12  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    I just hope they launch round 2 of LTE before the end of the year.
  13. #13  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Quote Originally Posted by ajonesma View Post
    I just hope they launch round 2 of LTE before the end of the year.
    I think they will. First, as Verizon has launched each of it's LTE markets they have not been 100% finished. Once launched they continue to fill in or finish out each market until 100% completed. I have also noticed this since day one here locally with VZW.


    With regards to Sprint's LTE launches:

    6/8/12

    In recently seen correspondence, Sprint has decided to move up launches sooner than 50% completion. This is likely to maintain a Mid 2012 launch in San Antonio. If they waited for 50% now, it would delay launch until August. In the case of San Antonio, should Sprint launch prior to the end of June, they would only be complete with approximately 35% to 40% of all NV sites. This doesn't sound like a lot, but it would provide pretty good coverage. A little known item is not even Verizon launches on all sites in a market initially. Usually less than 50%, then filling in with more and more sites every few months.

  14. #14  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Quote Originally Posted by themuffinman View Post
    Let this be clear-- I have been riding the lte waves for the last two days, I am on the southside of atlanta. Yeah, so no complaints from me. :

    Here are some screenshots from my gnex and my evo lte



    Man That's encouraging!
    Hows battery life?
    Last edited by awileycoyote21; 06-09-2012 at 07:43 PM. Reason: question
  15. #15  

    Default

    And let's be clear....... Two years later..... I'm out of here sprint, your done stealing my money!

    Sent from my sorry *** EVO 3D
  16. #16  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Quote Originally Posted by awileycoyote21 View Post
    Man That's encouraging!
    Hows battery life?
    Well as of earlier tonight I can no longer get an lte signal but for the two days I had it battery performance wasn't as bad as what I thought it was going to be. If I had to reasonably quantify battery life while on lte vs just on 3g I would say maybe 20% loss. Based on my usage I have been getting about 15 hours of battery life on the evo, with lte I would say I have gotten closer to 12 using the phone in the same manner. But of course there are many different factors that will determine individual mileage.
    Thanked by:
  17. #17  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Quote Originally Posted by 541rrhse View Post
    I think they will. First, as Verizon has launched each of it's LTE markets they have not been 100% finished. Once launched they continue to fill in or finish out each market until 100% completed. I have also noticed this since day one here locally with VZW.


    With regards to Sprint's LTE launches:

    6/8/12

    In recently seen correspondence, Sprint has decided to move up launches sooner than 50% completion. This is likely to maintain a Mid 2012 launch in San Antonio. If they waited for 50% now, it would delay launch until August. In the case of San Antonio, should Sprint launch prior to the end of June, they would only be complete with approximately 35% to 40% of all NV sites. This doesn't sound like a lot, but it would provide pretty good coverage. A little known item is not even Verizon launches on all sites in a market initially. Usually less than 50%, then filling in with more and more sites every few months.

    Yea..but when Verizon turned on LTE in Atlanta from day 1 they had the whole city blanketed for the most part. They came back in and thickened up the coverage but there were few if any places inside of I-285 where you couldn't get service. I figured Sprint would screw this up some type of way.
  18. #18  
    imtravis's Avatar

    Posts
    520 Posts
    Global Posts
    653 Global Posts
    ROM
    Stock/Jailbroken/Rooted

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    I've always wondered what 4G and/or LTE would be like.. If I went a block from my office, I'd get 4G with my previous evos. At home, no such luck... I go to the central valley and am flooded with it.. I do hope Sprint lights up LTE in the East Bay, where I can actually use it.
  19. #19  

    Default Re: Sprint lte put on hold

    Quote Originally Posted by brownhornet View Post
    Yea..but when Verizon turned on LTE in Atlanta from day 1 they had the whole city blanketed for the most part. They came back in and thickened up the coverage but there were few if any places inside of I-285 where you couldn't get service. I figured Sprint would screw this up some type of way.
    How have they screwed it up?

Posting Permissions