LTE on in Dallas TX

**ntorres6** · 07-15-2012, 02:39 PM

There is 4G in the intersection of I30 and 820...I had it yesterday while I was in that area...I have noticed that if you lose the signal sometimes you have to toggle between lte/cdma and cdma to get signal back, or toggle airplane mode, works the same...

**xXBLACKBERRYXx5** · 07-15-2012, 03:00 PM

Originally Posted by JHBThree

No. Your speeds are the speeds of an unloaded network with twice the bandwidth. Sprint's speeds are about normal, and pretty much what you can expect in most places on Verizon now too.

are you saying not as many people are using lte on at&t's network? because thats really a stupid thing for you to say seeing as sprint just got lte today rofl.

**rsa** · 07-15-2012, 03:25 PM

No 4G in north Dallas/Carrollton area!

**andyvance** · 07-15-2012, 03:45 PM

No LTE in Las Colinas.

**kiwicarlos741** · 07-15-2012, 03:59 PM

Originally Posted by robertelkins

are you saying not as many people are using lte on at&t's network? because thats really a stupid thing for you to say seeing as sprint just got lte today rofl.

Uh where do u base this statement off of, ppl were posting pics of LTE live when the phone was released, nice try buddy

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

**xXBLACKBERRYXx5** · 07-15-2012, 05:11 PM

Originally Posted by kiwicarlos741

Uh where do u base this statement off of, ppl were posting pics of LTE live when the phone was released, nice try buddy

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

Ur saying when the evo lte was released? U have no idea what ur talking about lol

Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums

**kiwicarlos741** · 07-15-2012, 05:20 PM

Removed by moderator
Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

**JHBThree** · 07-15-2012, 06:33 PM

Originally Posted by kiwicarlos741

And this is coming from a att user who hasn't been following the EVO threads since launch, let me inform u since u seem to lack even the slightest bit of knowledge, go check LTE goes live in Houston a couple threads downfrom this one, oh and why don't u tell me what the first post was posted on, June 15th with a screenshot u *****, that's not even the earliest one I've seen. You obviously are r*****ed just cause sprint says the launch date was recent doesn't mean it wasn't live, so next time u want to post a comment with no common knowledge on the subject, do your homework before hand. Yeah I have no idea bout what I'm talking bout, if this were true then that means u have the mind of a five year old. Nice try again but, u fail
Hahaha
Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

The network did not go live until this weekend. There may have been pockets that were active for sprint testing, but the network was neither at full strength nor fully active until yesterday/today.

**JHBThree** · 07-15-2012, 06:34 PM

Originally Posted by robertelkins

are you saying not as many people are using lte on at&t's network? because thats really a stupid thing for you to say seeing as sprint just got lte today rofl.

No, what I'm saying is that atts network is both unloaded AND higher capacity due to more bandwidth. It makes a difference with speeds.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

**xXBLACKBERRYXx5** · 07-15-2012, 06:41 PM

Originally Posted by JHBThree

No, what I'm saying is that atts network is both unloaded AND higher capacity due to more bandwidth. It makes a difference with speeds.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

So ur just proving my point that att is faster? I'm not all that techie I just know 55 mbps is a lot faster than 10

Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums

**EconomicMayhem** · 07-15-2012, 06:44 PM

I don't have an explanation for our upload download differences. In Korea 4G is not new and upload speeds are much higher than download. Your download speeds are faster or equal to upload. I wonder why. I assume in Korea the download speeds are governed to allow everyone access where the upload speeds seem not to be managed at all.

Sent from my LG-F160S, LG Optimus LTE 2

**JHBThree** · 07-15-2012, 06:58 PM

Originally Posted by robertelkins

So ur just proving my point that att is faster? I'm not all that techie I just know 55 mbps is a lot faster than 10

Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums

I never said att wasn't faster. You claimed att has 'real' lte in an attempt to put down sprints network. What you fail to understand is the reason why sprints speeds are different, why your insinuations are wrong, and why sprints network is every bit as advanced as atts.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

**kiwicarlos741** · 07-15-2012, 07:14 PM

Originally Posted by JHBThree

I never said att wasn't faster. You claimed att has 'real' lte in an attempt to put down sprints network. What you fail to understand is the reason why sprints speeds are different, why your insinuations are wrong, and why sprints network is every bit as advanced as atts.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

The guy doesn't know what he talking about (not u jhbthree), that's why he had nothing to say to my response before it was removed and completely ignored it, he's just looking to bash sprint and yet I get an infraction for proving my point to him, he was already wrong before and hell just keep talking without any foundation to what he says

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

**colleenrocks** · 07-15-2012, 07:18 PM

still on 3G in Carrollton/Lewisville. I work in North Dallas, hope to see 4g tomorrow AM.

**kiwicarlos741** · 07-15-2012, 07:23 PM

And for the record the fastest 4g LTE by sprint I saw was at 51 mbs down which was during the so call testing phase which I can understand there was prolly no one using the bandwidth thus making it soo high. Regadless of testing or not it was live ( meaning it was running) when the EVO first launched and many threads with timestamps prove this

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

**JHBThree** · 07-15-2012, 07:26 PM

Originally Posted by kiwicarlos741

And for the record the fastest 4g LTE by sprint I saw was at 51 mbs down which was during the so call testing phase which I can understand there was prolly no one using the bandwidth thus making it soo high. Regadless of testing or not it was live ( meaning it was running) when the EVO first launched and many threads with timestamps prove this

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

Live does not mean what you think it means. The network was not live if it was still being tested.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

**JHBThree** · 07-15-2012, 07:26 PM

Originally Posted by kiwicarlos741

The guy doesn't know what he talking about (not u jhbthree), that's why he had nothing to say to my response before it was removed and completely ignored it, he's just looking to bash sprint and yet I get an infraction for proving my point to him, he was already wrong before and hell just keep talking without any foundation to what he says

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

No, he was still right about the network not being live when the evo was released.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

**kiwicarlos741** · 07-15-2012, 07:29 PM

Originally Posted by kiwicarlos741
And for the record the fastest 4g LTE by sprint I saw was at 51 mbs down which was during the so call testing phase which I can understand there was prolly no one using the bandwidth thus making it soo high. Regadless of testing or not it was live ( meaning it was running) when the EVO first launched and many threads with timestamps prove this

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

You don't know what live means. The network was not live if it was still being tested.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Ok let me put it this way, when I say live what I'm trying to say is that it was up and running which means that u could actually use the LTE, its not that hard, the word live doesnt.only have one meaning but since people on here take things so literal god. Not to mention in that explanation you quoted I even said it with parantesses what I meant by live so I don't even understand what your trying to prove to me. I was agreeing with you in my posts

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

**JHBThree** · 07-15-2012, 07:32 PM

Originally Posted by kiwicarlos741

Ok let me put it this way, when I say live what I'm trying to say is that it was up and running which means that u could actually use the LTE, its not that hard, the word live doesnt.only have one meaning but since people on here take things so literal god

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

When you're using it in regards to a network it DOES have one meaning. Pre- launch the network was testing, not live. It is well documented that the network was nowhere near customer ready for a majority of people that were getting the signal, because sprint was still testing it. The network isn't considered 'live' until sprint has certified it for customer use.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

**kiwicarlos741** · 07-15-2012, 07:33 PM

Your making it seem like only your version or meaning of live is the only right one, it being live could mean a number of things to people, there is no right definition to what your saying as it can be interpreted differently by everyone thus proving my point

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

**JHBThree** · 07-15-2012, 08:45 PM

Originally Posted by kiwicarlos741

Your making it seem like only your version or meaning of live is the only right one, it being live could mean a number of things to people, there is no right definition to what your saying as it can be interpreted differently by everyone thus proving my point

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

No. You are trying to invent a definition of what it means that isn't actually true. The network was not live until yesterday/today.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

**kiwicarlos741** · 07-15-2012, 09:00 PM

Originally Posted by JHBThree

No. You are trying to invent a definition of what it means that isn't actually true. The network was not live until yesterday/today.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Ok your just being stubborn and can't accept the fact that your wrong but that's fine, I expected a response like this, OFFICIAL LAUNCH was yesterday, LTE was live which means its up and running when the EVO was launched. I'm so tired of these typical and so predictiable users on this forums. Live equals up and running. It's either on or its not, there's no innewteen testing or not, LTE was live on launch date, get it thru your head. I will not be posting any further comments on this as its no good talking to a stubborn brick wall. Go ahead and do whatever you must to make it seem like your in the right when your obviously not. Whatever makes u sleep better at night bud.

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

**JHBThree** · 07-15-2012, 09:05 PM

Originally Posted by kiwicarlos741

Ok your just being stubborn and can't accept the fact that your wrong but that's fine, I expected a response like this, OFFICIAL LAUNCH was yesterday, LTE was live which means its up and running when the EVO was launched. I'm so tired of these typical and so predictiable users on this forums. Live equals up and running. It's either on or its not, there's no innewteen testing or not, LTE was live on launch date, get it thru your head. I will not be posting any further comments on this as its no good talking to a stubborn brick wall. Go ahead and do whatever you must to make it seem like your in the right when your obviously not. Whatever makes u sleep better at night bud.

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

Take a deep breath and pay close attention: a network is not live until it has been certified by the carrier for consumer use. That DID NOT happen until this past week. Whatever usage you or anyone else saw prior to this weekend was a byproduct of sprints network tests in preparation for the network actually going live. There were reports from all over the launch markets leading up to this weekend of sporadic LTE availability with varying speeds and strength. Every single one of those instances were related to sprint testing. THAT is what happened, not anything else you or anyone else claims.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

**kiwicarlos741** · 07-15-2012, 09:05 PM

Originally Posted by JHBThree

No. You are trying to invent a definition of what it means that isn't actually true. The network was not live until yesterday/today.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Oh and for the record get out a dictionary, one definition of live is active and when I say LTE is live, LTE was actively on during the launch of the EVO hereby further proving my statement, check and mate, you fail horribly again. Have some common sense please

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

**kiwicarlos741** · 07-15-2012, 09:07 PM

Originally Posted by JHBThree

Take a deep breath and pay close attention: a network is not live until it has been certified by the carrier for consumer use. That DID NOT happen until this past week. Whatever usage you or anyone else saw prior to this weekend was a byproduct of sprints network tests in preparation for the network actually going live. THAT is what happened, not anything else you or anyone else claims.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Dictionary: live=active. LTE was active on launch, therefore LTE was live. Your in complete denial and your ego is too big to deal with the fact that your incorrect

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums