Welcome to the Android Central Forums Create Your Account or Ask a Question Answers in 5 minutes - no registration required!

View Poll Results: Would you give up 4G on your EVO to save $10/month?

Voters
256. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes - I'd rather save $10/Month than have 4G

    186 72.66%
  • No - I want my 4G and would pay the $10/Month

    70 27.34%
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 87
  1. Thread Author  Thread Author    #1  
    Gekko's Avatar
    Banned

    Posts
    5,880 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,236 Global Posts

    Default Would you give up 4G on your EVO to save $10/month?

    If Sprint came to you and said - "We'll let you remove the 4G feature from your plan and we'll reduce your bill by $10/month." - would you take them up on this offer?
  2. #2  
    manso1102's Avatar

    Posts
    65 Posts
    Global Posts
    66 Global Posts
    Carrier
    Vaelpak 3.2/Net 4.3.4

    Default

    In a heartbeat

    -EVO-
  3. #3  

    Default

    same here. id do it in a heartbeat. i live in so cal and there isnt 4g anywhere close to me. this $10 fee is ridiculous. There charging me for a service that they dont have to offer me. robbery!!!! has anyone ever complained to them for this reason and actually got a $10 credit each month? this has got to be against the law some how
  4. Thread Author  Thread Author    #4  
    Gekko's Avatar
    Banned

    Posts
    5,880 Posts
    Global Posts
    8,236 Global Posts

    Default

    well this poll was really for those who are in a 4G area. i rarely if ever use 4G because of the huge battery drain so it's really not worth it for me. and 3G is plenty fast for me. the simultaneous voice + data is nice but not worth $10/month. my intent was not to start a bunch of Sprint-bashing here but to see who sees what value in the 4G feature.
  5. #5  

    Default

    I wish we didn't have to pay for 4g like TMo. I really think TMo's HSPA+ is gonna be much better than Springs 4g. But anyway.. I use it a lot being in a 4g area. I have a problem paying the $10 "premium data experience" when I already pay for an unlimited data plan. Especially when again, TMo's 4G is free. But, I like having 4g so I vote no.
  6. #6  

    Default

    I live in Baltimore, the first city to have 4g and I would drop it. I am usually in a place where there is WiFi and only turn on 4g every now and then. I am so use to NOT having 4g on that I forget to turn it when I am places where it is available.
  7. #7  

    Default

    Yes and I live in a 4g area and rarely use it. If it was like 3g where I didn't have to flick a switch to turn it on/off and wait for a signal I would use it more often.
  8. #8  

    Default

    Well, the problem is that Sprint will NEVER tell you the $10 surcharge is for 4g. Technically, 4g could go away, and as far as they're concerned, you still have to pay the surcharge because the Evo is a multimedia/network intensive phone that allows premium services like two-way video chat and blah blah blah...regardless of whether or not it's on 3g or 4g. That's how they get away with charging the premium to those of us who don't live in a 4g market.
    cboo likes this.
  9. #9  
    tech411's Avatar

    Posts
    33 Posts
    Global Posts
    54 Global Posts

    Default

    Yes, it will be years before my town gets 4G
  10. #10  

    Default

    We're getting WiMax 12/1 in both the cities I spend most of my time and I'd still give it up in a heartbeat. I'd spent a few days this August in the Seatte Area (i.e., the home of Clearwire and presumably one of the best-served areas in the country) and it was still fairly spotty, not usable indoors much, and not really much faster real-world than 3G (and def. not WiFi).

    I hear LTE is supposed to be better, so in a couple of years when I'm sick of the EVO I'll get one that runs that band.
  11. #11  
    lvdata's Avatar

    Posts
    16 Posts
    Global Posts
    20 Global Posts

    Default

    I live in Las Vegas, NV and don't use the 4g because of the battery drain. I do use Clear for my home internet connection, and the larger clear modem is much better picking up a signal, but with 3/5 bars I don't get the speed I am paying for. 4g mobile is worthless as my 3g is stable and quick enough for what I need. By the time I remember to turn 4g on, I am done using my "slower" 3g connection. With 45 seconds to turn on 4g, there is almost no time it would save time. For large downloads I have Evo > Wifi > Clear > Internet and it is faster then the built in 4g modem and lower power.
  12. #12  

    Default

    You also have to remember that the $10 is not just for 4G, it is also for unlimited data instead of being capped at the 5 gig mark.
  13. #13  

    Default

    Absolutely

    Sent from my Evo 4G. using tapatalk
  14. #14  
    dtblair24's Avatar

    Posts
    270 Posts
    Global Posts
    289 Global Posts
    Carrier
    CyanogenMod 10

    Default

    Well since the 10bucks is for truly unlimited data, I might give up 4G and stay under a 5GB cap to save 10 bucks. I live in Atlanta but go to school in a non 4g city, and even in Atlanta 4g is spotty. At this point it isn't where it needs to be, drains the heck out of battery, so I am thinking I could live without it. Cool thing about 4G is that i can show it off to all my friends, and that it is faster than most people ATT DSL connections in atlanta.
  15. #15  

    Default

    I don't live in a 4g area - so heck yes I'd like that charge removed. It's sad turning on my phone everyday and seeing that bright 4g logo flashing me only to know that my phone will be outdated before it ever comes to our area......of course they say that charge isn't for the 4g........
  16. #16  
    Biffer's Avatar

    Posts
    53 Posts
    Global Posts
    54 Global Posts
    Carrier
    CM7

    Default

    4G coverage in Minneapolis is still spotty. It works poorly while driving. It slows down my entire phone terribly. For me, I'd take the money any day of the week.
  17. #17  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerzyiroc View Post
    I wish we didn't have to pay for 4g like TMo. I really think TMo's HSPA+ is gonna be much better than Springs 4g. But anyway.. I use it a lot being in a 4g area. I have a problem paying the $10 "premium data experience" when I already pay for an unlimited data plan. Especially when again, TMo's 4G is free. But, I like having 4g so I vote no.
    TMO's HSPA+ network is WICKED FAST!!! I had a Nexus One on T-Mobile and if your on HSPA+ it blew away what I get on the EVO.... The biggest problem with TMO was their overall coast to coast US coverage is very limited... Just driving down I-40 from either Nashville to Knoxville (2 hours 20 minutes) or Nashville to Memphis (3 hours) I was in Roaming mode unless near a major city and only got 3G in Nashville, Knoxville, Jackson, TN and Memphis... Outside of that your surfing around on Edge speeds or worse...

    Even with the $10 EVO tax (It's never ever - EVER been a 4G fee) my monthly plan is a hell of a lot cheaper than what I paid with AT&T and the iPhone... TMO's every thing plan (if you pay full price for the phone as I did with my Nexus One) is the best deal besides Sprint.. and if you live, work and play in a solid 3G or HSPA+ city TMO is the deal... I live 30 miles south east off I-24 from Nashville and only got Edge speeds at home.. had to drive at least 10 miles towards Nashville to get "3G" speeds...
  18. #18  

    Default

    i would in a heartbeat. i'm in chicago, and i haven't even turned on 4g yet since i bought the phone. i just read rss feeds, twitter and text (no streaming media), so 3g/wifi is plenty for me.
  19. #19  
    evoKY's Avatar

    Posts
    201 Posts
    Global Posts
    246 Global Posts
    Carrier
    CM7/ Bonsai

    Default

    It's only $10... I always consider the fee an extra monthly tax to have the worlds best phone ever made!
  20. #20  

    Default

    I think most of us are paying the extra $10 a month not for 4G but for the phones we wanted.
  21. #21  

    Default

    I have a 4g tower less than 1/2 a mile from my house. I tether with 4g and the internet is quicker than using the comcast cable connection. With 4 laptops, 3 desktops, and other wifi using devices my home internet goes pretty slow. So no I would not give up 4g.
  22. #22  
    jlboi913's Avatar

    Posts
    6 Posts
    Global Posts
    15 Global Posts

    Default

    No I use tethering a lot and like the quick speeds
  23. #23  
    kamtsa's Avatar

    Posts
    348 Posts
    Global Posts
    349 Global Posts

    Default

    Definitely. Never using 4G. It drains my battery too fast.
  24. #24  

    Default

    Just how fast is the battery drain when 4G is on?
  25. #25  
    81
    81 is offline
    81's Avatar

    Posts
    147 Posts
    Global Posts
    146 Global Posts

    Default

    oops, i voted wrong.

    i want my 4G. i use it all the time. anybody that isn't taking advantage of it, should go buy a 3G phone.
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions