- 03-19-2013, 09:03 AM
Thread Author #1
- 03-19-2013, 09:20 AM #2
- 03-19-2013, 09:37 AM #3
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
I have been following this story very closely for the past two weeks. We knew over a week ago that they had not produced as many units as intended and that it was down to component supply, namely the camera, and that was down to the supplier not achieving targets. There was not a supply issue with the aluminum body, this is a chinese whisper that grew out of HTC's own marketing when they described the manufacturing process, taking 200 minutes to mill each body from a single piece of metal a la Apple.
The simple fact that proves this story wrong is me typing this reply on a UK retail supplied HTC One. They did launch on time albeit only the 32gb silver variant and only through certain outlets.
I thought reporters were supposed to check their facts? - 03-19-2013, 09:38 AM
Thread Author #4
- 03-19-2013, 09:45 AM #5
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
I replied on the Verge and I'll do it here. I don't care the what reason it is. I know that units are ready to sell so lets get them sold. Being in the US I have dealt with missing out due to stock limitations. All my local store needs is one because I'll camp out.
HTC - I'm on the Sprint network and ready to buy, the ball is in your court. - 03-19-2013, 09:48 AM #6
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
Either way, it's HTC's past failings that got it to this point. I personally don't like HTC, but that doesn't mean I want to see it go away, either. Something that I think would help them is if they had a phone that spanned across multiple carriers. Let's take the EVO. I think it's a good phone, but it's only available through Sprint. My mom has a Moto, and hates it. I am trying to suggest HTC, but she had Verizon, and their HTCs suck....
- 03-19-2013, 10:55 AM #7
- 03-19-2013, 11:14 AM
Thread Author #8
- 03-19-2013, 11:50 AM #9
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
Ouch.
a.k.a. RyZR from HoFo
Motorola DROID Bionic (6.7.246.XT865.Verizon.en.US, Ice Cream Sandwich 4.0.4)
Google Nexus 7 (JDQ39, Jelly Bean 4.2.2)
What other devices have I had? Here's my phone timeline.
Support your favorite Android app and game developers. Pay for apps! And don't block ads! - 03-19-2013, 11:53 AM #10
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
Where do you think the power button is on the One? Or where it was on pretty much every other HTC device? And while I don't have a DNA I have a couple friends who do and they rave about the battery life. I've seen lots of folks coming around these parts to refute the poor battery life statement as well, so I don't know that the battery life there is that bad.
- 03-19-2013, 12:18 PM #11
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
I don't get this. Unless HTC made a smaller order than some one else or were late on a past payment, I don't see why they would lose top tier status. If the suppliers job is supplying one component, then what does it matter if you customer sold his last order, as long as you get paid for your work?
- 03-19-2013, 12:52 PM #12
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
Taken at face value this statement is a little ridiculous.
- 03-19-2013, 02:12 PM #13
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
My battery life is fantastic on my DNA, better that I thought it would be when I purchased it. The power button on top, while weird becomes second nature as you might expect. Now I kind of like it just because I don't accidentally lock it when going for the volume button like I sometimes do with my Nexus 7.
Anyways, the story isn't all that surprising. They have obviously been struggling to stay profitable. What I didn't know though is that suppliers could down or upgrade your status and hold up production. I guess I always assumed if you put in an order for a couple million parts that it would be filled by some agreed upon date. Unless of course the demand is higher than expected..."But when you see people who have decided that their preference should be the model for all, you know you're dealing with dummies." - BigDinCA - 03-19-2013, 02:20 PM #14
- 03-19-2013, 02:50 PM #15
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
Sounds familiar -
At that time, Apple was almost singlehandedly dominating the smartphone supply chain and it took an enormous commitment — the kind of commitment that only a giant like HP could offer — to tip the scale. "We told HP we needed better displays [for the Pre 3]. They'd come back and say, ‘Apple bought them all. Our suppliers tell us we need to build them a factory if we want the displays' and they weren't willing to put the billion dollars upfront to do that," one source said. "The same thing happened with cameras. We'd pick a part, turns out Apple picked the same part. We were screwed left and right." Without HP's full financial support to buy its way into relevance, Palm was essentially left to pick from the corporate parts bin — a problem that would strike particularly hard later on with the TouchPad.a.k.a. RyZR from HoFo
Motorola DROID Bionic (6.7.246.XT865.Verizon.en.US, Ice Cream Sandwich 4.0.4)
Google Nexus 7 (JDQ39, Jelly Bean 4.2.2)
What other devices have I had? Here's my phone timeline.
Support your favorite Android app and game developers. Pay for apps! And don't block ads! - 03-19-2013, 03:31 PM #16
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
I don't think it works like that. These suppliers sign contracts, I'm sure with some stipulations and expectations inside. People in the industry value a good reputation. If a supplier becomes known for dropping it's clients because somebody offers more money or makes a threat that does not bode well for them securing other jobs. I also think we here on these forums put way too much emphasis on what a company(Namely Samsung) did last year. They are definitely the most influential name in the business right now but I don't think they run everything behind the scenes. Now having said that, I've seen stories in the past where Samsung was making parts for other companies and in that case I can definitely see them making parts for themselves first. Wouldn't it be funny to find out Samsung was supplying the parts HTC is waiting on.
EDIT- my post apparently got hung up for an hour on my phone. I attempted to post before the Apple post was made. I'll add though that its kind of to my point. Samsung doesn't haven't the same pull Apple did when they were demanding all the best parts. Maybe they will some day, but that kind of speaks to my previous point that I think these suppliers know that in a couple short phone generations anyone could be on top. Besides it sounds like the suppliers had already allotted for Apple by the time Palm tried to place an order. If that's the case with HTC I think it's still their fault.Last edited by jiggyb21; 03-19-2013 at 03:49 PM.
- 03-19-2013, 03:49 PM #17
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
- 03-19-2013, 03:56 PM #18
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
- 03-19-2013, 04:01 PM #19
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
If another company comes along and wants to buy all of your stock of a particular item, and offers you a premium, wouldn't you be tempted to do it? Also, could be that the camera module is having low yields, and we also know that the aluminum body takes ~3 hours of machining to make.
Forum Rules & Guidelines -- CLICK HERE
I'm an NVIDIA Tegra Champ. Here's what that means. It means that from time to time I might receive products and/or services from NVIDIA to evaluate them and provide feedback to NVIDIA and you, our valuable members. What this does NOT mean is that my opinion will be biased. Any opinion that I express here and elsewhere are solely based on my personal preference and any relevant expertise that I may/may not have on the subject matter. - 03-19-2013, 04:36 PM #20
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
It seems like only Android OEMs seem to have problems launching their devices.. i mean.. Google couldn't keep the Nexus 4 in stock for 10mins.. let's not mention the Nexus 7 pre-order drama..
Should we not expect this type mess from a company who is fighting to stay alive?Current Devices: Nexus 4, Nexus 10, Nexus 7, Galaxy Note 2, Galaxy S3, iPhone 5. Soon HTC One - 03-19-2013, 05:29 PM #21
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
- 03-19-2013, 05:30 PM #22
Re: HTC's One delayed because suppliers think it's 'no longer a tier-one customer,' says WSJ
Ill still wait until google io to make my choice of a new phone. Im not sold on either the s4 nor the htc one at this point. I may look into moto and hopefully another nexus. I still say this aint good for htc but theres nothing we can do about it.
- 03-19-2013, 05:33 PM #23
- 03-19-2013, 05:36 PM #24
- 03-19-2013, 05:43 PM #25
Similar Threads
-
HTC One delayed in US until Mid April
By jw nyc in forum HTC OneReplies: 96Last Post: 03-22-2013, 08:43 AM -
Can't delete Peep app because i guess its built into Sense
By Xterror in forum Android ApplicationsReplies: 2Last Post: 05-01-2010, 01:56 AM -
Can't delete Peep app because i guess its built into Sense
By Xterror in forum Verizon Droid IncredibleReplies: 0Last Post: 04-30-2010, 05:53 PM -
How to trick N1 into thinking its on WiFi?
By ap3604 in forum Google / HTC Nexus OneReplies: 1Last Post: 04-11-2010, 09:22 AM -
sd card removed. insert a new one.....HOW DO I SOLVE IT!!!!! HELP!!!
By igor alves in forum T-Mobile G1Replies: 1Last Post: 03-23-2010, 11:35 AM



Reply
































