Hot new rumor!

jman1323

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2012
68
0
0
Visit site
Well the G2 was one of the first to feature the Snapdragon 800. It seems a bit early to see the 805 but lets hope so!
 

RHChan84

Well-known member
Dec 6, 2010
2,253
106
63
Visit site
Would be nice to see a company put a big battery and SD slot into their phones.

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
 

Murph5150

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2010
1,163
31
0
Visit site
Samsung put 2GB of RAM in their S5 where LG is going with 3GB RAM, so I don't see it being improbable they will use the 805 processor.

Battery capacity out of the box is pretty good. However, the wireless world is NOT ready for non-removable batteries yet. The lithium ion batteries don't develop memory like the nickel cadmium batteries from way back did, but the more charging cycles a phone goes through, the less capacity the battery has. And given that we are stuck with a phone for 2 years, it's cheaper to replace the battery than it is the phone. So hopefully we will see a removable battery.

My Galaxy S4, 10 months old, OE battery, struggles to make it through a day with light to moderate use whereas when it was new, would cruise through a day with leftover juice.

Also, has anyone confirmed the LG G3 will have LTE Cat 4? The Sony Xperia Z2 seems to have all of the CDMA and LTE capabilities to end up on Verizon, and if it does, choosing between the Z2 and G3 will be difficult. The Z2 doesn't have a removable battery. So if the G3 does come with a removable battery, that will be the decision maker for me.

Posted via Android Central App
 

kingmac38

Well-known member
Dec 14, 2010
152
0
0
Visit site
Samsung put 2GB of RAM in their S5 where LG is going with 3GB RAM, so I don't see it being improbable they will use the 805 processor.

Battery capacity out of the box is pretty good. However, the wireless world is NOT ready for non-removable batteries yet. The lithium ion batteries don't develop memory like the nickel cadmium batteries from way back did, but the more charging cycles a phone goes through, the less capacity the battery has. And given that we are stuck with a phone for 2 years, it's cheaper to replace the battery than it is the phone. So hopefully we will see a removable battery.

My Galaxy S4, 10 months old, OE battery, struggles to make it through a day with light to moderate use whereas when it was new, would cruise through a day with leftover juice.

Also, has anyone confirmed the LG G3 will have LTE Cat 4? The Sony Xperia Z2 seems to have all of the CDMA and LTE capabilities to end up on Verizon, and if it does, choosing between the Z2 and G3 will be difficult. The Z2 doesn't have a removable battery. So if the G3 does come with a removable battery, that will be the decision maker for me.

Posted via Android Central App

You must not have seen this huh
usyzebyh.jpg


Sent from my SM-G900P using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
 

kingmac38

Well-known member
Dec 14, 2010
152
0
0
Visit site
Just because it's a removable cover doesn't mean removable bsttery




Sent from Bad Azz VZW LG G2 Cyan Tapatalk

You can't see that the battery is actually moved aside ....see the battery connections right there ... it is removable


Sent from my SM-G900P using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
 

erwaso

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2011
2,652
18
0
Visit site
Well the G2 was one of the first to feature the Snapdragon 800. It seems a bit early to see the 805 but lets hope so!

And the g pro was first to have the 600. But I think it might be too early for 805 :(

Posted via Android Central App
 

Murph5150

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2010
1,163
31
0
Visit site
SD cards are a thing of past just like removable batteries.



Sent from Bad Azz VZW LG G2 Cyan Tapatalk

Apparently not, considering the G3 will have both. The G3 is undoubtedly the best rumored and essentially confirmed phone for 2014. And if it comes with the 805 processor, I'd he hard pressed to see a rival for the remainder of the year.

This is a phone that I can safely say will be cranking nicely and performing probably close to its competition in two years when my next upgrade comes along.

Posted via Android Central App
 

Mst99

Well-known member
Apr 9, 2014
142
0
0
Visit site
The millions of people who buy Samsung flagships will disagree with you lol

Posted via Android Central App

Yup, won't buy a phone without a removable battery. I don't care how long they claim their battery lasts.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
 

Relgoshan

Well-known member
May 16, 2011
1,057
8
0
Visit site
Hahaha battery quality matters too tho. My Echo came with two of them almost four years ago and when I swapped out for a Flex it could still go a day on either one. One laptop hit half capacity in less than two years, another went over three before hitting the death spiral. So the source for their batteries is important.

My Flex can go ten hours browsing out of the box, and review sites were seemingly in competition to claim ever higher video playback life. 12, 15, 18, even 20 hours video playback? My plan will let me swap after only one year so I've got that protection against a rapid drop too.

If the G3 has a battery as big as the Flex, swappable, better camera setup, fast AND more miserly 805 CPU, and no major software issues.....seems nice. Then all they gotta do is use that experience to make me a Flex 2 as soon as possible.
 

Murph5150

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2010
1,163
31
0
Visit site
Today's batteries, specifically lithium ion composite batteries do not develop memory like nickel cadmium batteries did. HOWEVER, the more a lithium ion battery is exposed to charging cycles, the less capacity it has to hold a charge.

For example. My Galaxy S4 was purchased July 2013. Out of the box, I would return from home after heavy daily usage with approximately 50% remaining. Now, less than a year later, I struggle to make it a full day with drastically reduced usage, forcing me to purchase a Mophie Juice Pack.

I'm a mechanical engineer, not an electrical engineer, but have built plenty of aerospace turbines to be familiar with charging degradation. I also have an M.Sc Theoretical Physics so when problems become really abstract, I'm called on to solve problems; often turbine relation to charging amps/volts through the Brayton Cycle.

Posted via Android Central App
 

Relgoshan

Well-known member
May 16, 2011
1,057
8
0
Visit site
Today's batteries, specifically lithium ion composite batteries do not develop memory like nickel cadmium batteries did. HOWEVER, the more a lithium ion battery is exposed to charging cycles, the less capacity it has to hold a charge.

For example. My Galaxy S4 was purchased July 2013. Out of the box, I would return from home after heavy daily usage with approximately 50% remaining. Now, less than a year later, I struggle to make it a full day with drastically reduced usage, forcing me to purchase a Mophie Juice Pack.

I'm a mechanical engineer, not an electrical engineer, but have built plenty of aerospace turbines to be familiar with charging degradation. I also have an M.Sc Theoretical Physics so when problems become really abstract, I'm called on to solve problems; often turbine relation to charging amps/volts through the Brayton Cycle.

Posted via Android Central App

*ahem* "Hahaha battery quality matters too tho."

I am sticking with this. A junk battery is a junk battery. A lot of the top shelf phones use Lithium Polymer which has even fewer cycles than Lithium Ion, which makes the QUALITY matter even more. Now they are talking about silver like it will save them. But this is exactly the same issue encountered by anyone who owned say a DeWalt cordless tool, a Ryobi cordless and a Craftsman. The grade of battery still influences how many full charge cycles it will take.

At least as we move beyond li-ion there seems to be a reduced risk of explosions, but there are still li-ion hong kong counterfeits blowing up on the charger. You don't have an inkling to the endurance of your battery until anywhere from six months to a year after purchase, hence the rules concerning the battery in most electronics warranties.

.......and what did the last paragraph have to do with the topic? Please stay on topic here. One of the top sources of charge degradation in aerospace was still vibration damage last I checked. Between cooling and vibration many big ticket planes have been set back in their development. At least the turbines themselves can be tapped for very clean and stable power due to their rotational speed and momentum, hence why gas turbines are so loved by utilities.