08-09-2013 11:44 PM
- There are a lot of negative about Moto X but the problem is all those Negative comes from GEEKS.
This is why Moto X will save Motorola! Watch this video. Please! Watch this video before posting a reply.
some negative comments listed below!!Are you smoking what Google-Motorola smoking....? do you see FAIL!!!
What has Google just done?!?
Yes, most of us here are geeks and we value spec vs price unlike the average consumer who value feature Vs price.
People complaining about processor. Do you guys even know what natural language processor and contextual processor do??
Contextual processor: The contextual computing processor handles the sensors, display and touch interaction,
but it also appears to function as the primary processor when the phone is in standby mode,
including showing status and notification information on the display.
Natural Language Processor: The natural language processor deals with audio, noise estimation
and noise cancellation;
phones like N4 would use 2 cores for all of the android related task and apps use the same cores too.
The other 2 cores is useless unless some customized Apps/Android use it.
Contextual processor is used in half of what you do with smartphone leaving the other 2 processor cores to apps.
I dont know if people understand this but this is an optimized quad core processor.08-02-2013 08:44 PMLike 12
- I'd also point out that all (as in 100%) of the negatives I've seen listed are preconceptions based on a spec sheet, not speaking to it's importance. If the dual core out performs or performs just as well as the quad core, which one sucks? The screen is indeed not 1080p, but no one is arguing that it needs to be and very few people have actually seen it to decide if it is a nice looking screen or a sub-par one or the best screen they've ever seen. Specs are useful for trying to explain highs and lows in user experience, but they do not tell the full story of a device in any way. It is not over priced nor under spec'd nor 2011 spec'd nor "a huge fail" IF it offers an equal to or superior user experience to the majority of customers who choose it. Throwing specs at a device is not the only way to improve performance, but it is the fastest way to delve deep into your diminishing rates of return on performance.08-02-2013 08:55 PM
- Can the Moto X save Motorola? NO!! And this video nails why at about the 5:40 mark. They want to sell it based on features. 99% of people will buy it based on features, and the biggest feature they're emphasizing will not be available to the vast majority of people. How will the phone save Motorola when people walk into their carrier's store, say "hey I wanna buy that phone that I can design myself" and then they end up buying something else when they find out they can't really design the phone themselves?08-02-2013 08:58 PM
- I'd also point out that all (as in 100%) of the negatives I've seen listed are preconceptions based on a spec sheet, not speaking to it's importance. If the dual core out performs or performs just as well as the quad core, which one sucks? The screen is indeed not 1080p, but no one is arguing that it needs to be and very few people have actually seen it to decide if it is a nice looking screen or a sub-par one or the best screen they've ever seen. Specs are useful for trying to explain highs and lows in user experience, but they do not tell the full story of a device in any way. It is not over priced nor under spec'd nor 2011 spec'd nor "a huge fail" IF it offers an equal to or superior user experience to the majority of customers who choose it. Throwing specs at a device is not the only way to improve performance, but it is the fastest way to delve deep into your diminishing rates of return on performance.08-02-2013 09:01 PM
- 08-02-2013 09:09 PM
- If you're referring to the carrier exclusives, that's not something wrong with the device, that's something wrong with the availability. And on that, you're 10000% right, having any carrier exclusives is fairly fail and unduly restricts consumer choice. This should have been available through carriers, through moto maker, maybe the play store, carrier unlocked or carrier specific with full customization options available in some way through all channels.08-02-2013 09:12 PM
- I still do not understand how so many people can pre-judge a device based only on what they've heard or read, and not based on actual experience. Folks, give it a chance. If it really doesn't perform well, then by all means, heap on the criticism. But to make doomsday proclamations based on words is a bit overzealous, in my opinion.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using AC Forums mobile app08-02-2013 10:06 PMLike 10
- Like many nerds here, I was letdown the X phone didn't pack more technology than a NASA rocket. But then I considered how logical it was the create this device.
Know how Apple sells tens of millions of iPhone's? By building a product for consumer masses, not niche groups like us tech junkies.
Why can't this phone be priced like a flagship? Does it not offer its own unique experience and feature set? General consumers won't compare the S4 Pro and S600 processors. Consumers buy into an experience, and that's clearly what Motorola and Google are banking on.
I think this phone is quite well done. It's a device plainly thumbing it's nose at the tech spec war and presenting consumers an alternative way to gage the value of smartphones. Again, I turn to Apple, a company with little interest in spec sheets, but rather created a vast ecosystem that consumers pay top dollar for.
This phone may not be the device we all dreamed up, so you know what? Buy something else. That's the beauty of Android. Maybe we don't believe that nonsense idea about creating a software experience, and maybe we wanted the latest and greatest hardware. And there's nothing wrong with that because unlike Apple, we have choices.
Good day.08-02-2013 10:09 PMLike 6
- And unfortunately for them they have upset a large portion on the techies with the specs, and they will end up upsetting a large portion of non-techies because of the exclusivity stopping people from getting the most unique feature of the phone. They just flat out screwed this one up.08-02-2013 10:13 PM
- 08-02-2013 10:16 PM
- I think this phone is quite well done. It's a device plainly thumbing it's nose at the tech spec war and presenting consumers an alternative way to gage the value of smartphones. Again, I turn to Apple, a company with little interest in spec sheets, but rather created a vast Apple ecosystem that consumers pay top dollar for.08-02-2013 10:20 PM
- This is the problem though... it doesn't have mid-range specs. That's where people are asking you to look beyond core count into capabilities. Read Jerry's posts on the subject. The $5 or so difference between the S4 based custom processor they used and the S600 wouldn't have budged the price by $300 or whatever it is people wanted to see.08-02-2013 10:26 PM
- 08-02-2013 10:31 PM
- This is the problem though... it doesn't have mid-range specs. That's where people are asking you to look beyond core count into capabilities. Read Jerry's posts on the subject. The $5 or so difference between the S4 based custom processor they used and the S600 wouldn't have budged the price by $300 or whatever it is people wanted to see.
In terms of hardware, the iPhone 5 is pretty much a mid range device (in terms of hardware) imo, and has a $207 BOM. The US spec S4 has a $234 BOM. Even though Moto is saying that the screen doesn't matter, and maybe it doesn't really, but it is a substantial savings, the iPhone 5 display costs $44, the s4 display costs $74. Granted, the Moto X is larger than the iPhone display, but has a slightly lower PPI. I don't have the cost of the Moto X display, but if i had to guess, i would say around $54.
The thing for me is that the Nexus 7 has a BOM of $152 and sold for $200. My guess is the Moto X BOM cost is somewhere around $220 based on it's specs. So, using the same margin, around $300 would be the selling price.
I think Moto is trying to be like Apple, selling mid-range spec phones, but optimized for the end user to have a good experience. Apple can get away with this, but in the Android front, it is a tougher sell. It might work, but we shall see. I am sure that the Moto X would run just fine, just like a computer with an i5 and another with an i7 won't make much difference for most people during normal usage. But the i7 sells at a premium. Only Apple has been able to get away with selling a mid range device (hardware wise) at a high end price so far.
Sent from my Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II08-02-2013 11:22 PM
I sorta think myself as a "Tech Nerd", I like to keep up on phone releases, remember specs and the such. But I am interested in this device. I don't think it's mid-range at all. It feels different, the X8, 4.2.2. Dosen't feel like a typical run of the mill mid-range or even high end phone. If Moto was like ok we got a dual core s4 pro and a 8mp camera and it'll have 4.0 or 4.1 to be nice. I'll agree with the hate. But thats not how its like.08-02-2013 11:40 PM
- 08-02-2013 11:48 PM
- If that's the case put the darn best cpu in then. Most of the belly aching would have subsided then. By intentionally doing this they gave false hope with no communication. As they said the extra dsp's were not exclusive to the cpu. In other words "We want this in other systems to". Blow the extra 5 bucks if you want to make it at a premium price. Give me lesser then I expect it cheaper period. If Moto can pull this off good for them. As of now color me blah.
I'm more than happy with the development issues regarding the two DSPs to enable features that seem like they will actually benefit real world experience while also allowing for less battery usage. I think that these will reduce the reliance on the CPU... especially the contextual processing one.
Still, as everyone with the knowledge knows that the GPU is most important in the UX for mobile devices. That's one reason why the iPhone is so smooth because of its prioritizing the graphical abilities in the phone.08-02-2013 11:50 PM
- Honestly, I think it may have been about either power management or space more so than cost. The problem with comparing to the Nexus lines is that Google subsidizes those, whereas they do not for other Android devices. The margin you're seeing on the Nexus is probably going all or mostly to ASUS. A more accurate comparison would be to the GPe devices, which are $599 and $649 for approximately the same manufacturing cost.
Really though, if money is an issue, and you didn't mind doing a bit of work, you can get the s4 new off contract for $450 after gc's and etf from best buy.
The Verizon note 2 was $400 off contract, and the DNA was $300 off contract, based on similar methods/deals previously.
Although, admittedly, not many people are willing to do these methods. I just wanted to point out that it is possible, for those determined.
Sent from my Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II08-02-2013 11:56 PM
It also goes to show how useless rumors are.
But let's also remember that the gnex was $300 on contract with Verizon when released, and when it went to the play store a few months later, it was $400
Similarly, the tmobile nexus 4 was $200 on contract or $300 from the play store.
So perhaps the Moto X will be released at a lower price after a few months
Sent from my Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II08-03-2013 12:45 AM
- The other pricing consideration that I think is relevant and perhaps lost in translation is that all of the sunk costs, (R&D, building the plant, hiring people, payroll, commissions, sales, advertising, taxes, etc) are spread out among devices sold. They aren't planning to sell 10 million of these, they know it isn't an S4. The more devices you spread the sunk costs over, the more profit you average per device. If you figure it's $225 for the device, $75 for assembly, and spread the other $100 for advertising, $50 for operating expenses... that's $450 and that's without a carrier getting any cut of the pie. Margins on this could already be slim, we don't really have a way of knowing unless someone from decision sciences, accounting or the board room leaks an ROI.08-03-2013 12:55 AM
Il, according to rumors the world was supposed to end last year... But look, here we are debating cell phones. Safe and sound.08-03-2013 12:56 AM
- By NovaSS369 in forum Moto X (2013)Replies: 16Last Post: 09-02-2013, 07:45 PM
- By chihhsic in forum Google Nexus 7 Tablet (2012)Replies: 8Last Post: 08-03-2013, 10:17 PM
- By psychoD33x in forum Moto X (2013)Replies: 6Last Post: 08-02-2013, 08:27 PM
- By ksb78 in forum Android 2.3 GingerbreadReplies: 1Last Post: 08-02-2013, 04:23 PM
- By freedda in forum Chrome OSReplies: 3Last Post: 08-02-2013, 04:00 PM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD