- 08-23-2012, 08:25 PM
Thread Author #26
- 08-23-2012, 08:33 PM
Thread Author #27
Re: Sluggish according to some reviews
Thanks. I posted my concern and came back a day later to see so many responses. Why are so many "professional reviews" very negative while the real users are mostly positive?
Specific question: How accurate is the text recognition on the S Note? This is/the/#1 reason I want this. As/a/therapist I would like to hand write my notes and have the tablet convert to text. - 08-23-2012, 08:35 PM
Thread Author #28
- 08-23-2012, 08:38 PM
Thread Author #29
- 08-23-2012, 08:42 PM
Thread Author #30
- 08-23-2012, 08:47 PM
Thread Author #31
- 08-23-2012, 09:46 PM #32
Re: Sluggish according to some reviews
I multitask all the time with the Note app and the web. I've seen no real sluggishness. There is a tiny bit of a delay when one window goes from inactive to active. For instance if I write on a note for a bit, and then go back to scroll the web page or click a link, there is a slight delay. But you know, if it were instant, always running, you could just sit and watch the battery drain. I think the slight delay is worth it to be able to have a portable tablet that let's you do so much!
Trust me, when the original Galaxy Note came out I was furious at the lousy reviews and it wasn't even for sale yet. Some reviews were just awful. Once I got the phone and it went on sale here, there were even more such reviews. I left comments only to let people know there was real value in this wonderful large size phone. I realized most of them were the same site names as the other awful reviews from when the Galaxy Note first launched. When I looked up the other articles on the sites, most of them were very pro apple. I dearly love my original Galaxy Note and wouldn't give it up for anything! A lot of those writers now preface articles about the Note as the surprise hit and certainly don't quote their own reviews of it. It wasn't a surprise hit to me! Once upon a time when DOS was new, yes I know that ages me!, everyone welcomed innovation from anywhere. The animosity now is so unfair to users who might believe it. - 08-23-2012, 09:48 PM #33
Re: Sluggish according to some reviews
I think Apple is scared to death--they appear to be planting negative stuff wheerever they can. I haven't experienced any sluggishness at all. The Apple attack appears to be centered around "it's sluggish" and "nobody wants a pen". They did the same sort of thing when the Kindle Fire and the Nexus 7" tablet came out. Apparently, Apple really is the new Microsoft.
Try the tablet and decide for yourself. - 08-23-2012, 11:16 PM #34
- 08-23-2012, 11:17 PM #35
Seriously? You think apple is paying all of these reviewers (android sites included) to say bad things about the note? Get real.
Apple is not afraid of the note. Given the current state of the market and Samsung's inability to make a tablet that can compete with the iPad sales-wise, they have no reason to be concerned.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2 - 08-24-2012, 10:57 AM #36
Re: Sluggish according to some reviews
- 08-24-2012, 02:29 PM #37
- AT&T HTC One (32GB Stealth Black)
- AT&T Samsung Galaxy S4 (16GB White)
- Apple iPad mini (16GB White)
- 08-24-2012, 02:50 PM #38
- 08-24-2012, 03:20 PM #39
Re: Sluggish according to some reviews
I think the problem is defining the competition. This isn't just a tablet that includes a spot for a stylus. The Wacom digitizer is like nothing any other tablet has. I see a lot of reviews saying to get the Nexus 7 instead, and that just doesn't make sense. Realistically, the Nexus 7 is popular because of the price, and nothing else.
I applaud Samsung for trying something different. No one can equal the iPad. Android tablets have a long way to go; they just can't seem to get it right. Hopefully that changes. But for now, the S-Pen is a pretty cool feature. I just think Samsung needs to market it differently so it doesn't look like it's an iPad competitor. - 08-24-2012, 03:28 PM #40
Re: Sluggish according to some reviews
Nowhere is it written that the iPad has to be included. I wont buy Apple simply because I don't like their devices or business model. Pretty sure the guy CAN speak "strictly of Android" if he wants to. And the iPad is competition if you are only talking about tablet basics but in my opinion, the Note is in a league of it's own. Sorry if you have to include the iPad, but that doesn't mean everyone does. This Note meets my needs and the iPad does not. So I don't care about it.
To the man asking about note taking in his patients' therapy sessions, this thing would be awesome for that. You can pick different tips, as well as pen, pencil, brush, chisel tip, and another option within S-Note. You also can pick various colors or widths. There are SO many options! - 08-24-2012, 03:46 PM #41
Re: Sluggish according to some reviews
Actually, that is incorrect. The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet and the HTC Jetstream have both had the same thing for about a year. I think they both use N-Trig technology for the digitizer and stylus, though, not Wacom.
I never bought a TPT because they were a bit pricey and they had some serious hardware bugs when they came out, which Lenovo promptly, steadfastly denied. A lot of their customers really got screwed over on that deal.
And I never bought a Jetstream because they were only available from AT&T, and with a cellular connection. So, you either had to pay a lot of money, plus sign a 2-year contract with a data plan, OR you had to pay a SHLOAD of money to get it with no contract. Also, apparently, the software was a bit buggy and HTC wasn't seeming too responsive to fixing them. However, the note-taking software on the Jetstream was what I consider to be the Gold Standard because it was built on top of the Evernote API, so it didn't just export to Evernote, it was fully integrated with Evernote. The Jetstream had very comparable specs to the Note, actually.
And then there were some other smaller tablets, like the HTC Flyer, which was 7" and came with Android 2.something (Froyo, I think).
So, no, the GNote 10.1 is not the only tablet that does what it does. It's just the best. :-) - 08-24-2012, 04:11 PM #42
- 08-24-2012, 11:55 PM #43
- 08-27-2012, 09:30 AM #44
Re: Sluggish according to some reviews
I actually was aware of these (as well, the Moto xyboard 10 incher has a pressure sensitive stylus), but was never impressed with any of them (I was tempted once or twice to try the Jetstream, but it was seriously overpriced). My understanding was that HTC had done a better job with the stylus software, but nothing, sorry, nothing beats Wacom, IMO. They've been an industry standard for artists for this long for a reason.
Note + Wacom digitizer > the Jetstream, ThinkPad, and XYBoard
The Jetstream has the most respectable specs out of the three, but the Note still beats it, especially with the 2GB of RAM. - 08-27-2012, 05:17 PM #45
Re: Sluggish according to some reviews
Why? Because it's also a tablet? Well then we need to compare it to a slab of wood if it's a similar shape. The iPad is not even in the same consumer environment as the Note. If YOU want to compare them, fine. But that doesn't mean everyone has to simply because they are both Tablets. If Samsung came out and declared that the Note 10.1 was here to dethrone the iPad and put an end to Apple Tablet dominance, then yes you'd be correct. But that is not the goal of Samsung in this device. Just because we disagree, doesn't mean either of us is right. But it's nonsense to generalize the entire tablet market in such a way.




Reply



































