I have tried 2 & they only record my end, not the other side of the conversation
Thanks for any info anybody has!
Cheers, Jon
Thanks for any info anybody has!
Cheers, Jon
Is it true that some states require ALL participants being recorded to consent to being recorded? I understand some states don't allow you to record another person without their consent.
I would suspect that you can record anything you want to which you're a party to the conversation. Using that recording in any may require consent from the other party.
Usually I record things like changing airline reservations. You'll note that when you call any service you get a pre-message which states "this call may be recorded for quality purposes". To me, that means the other party has released their expectation of privacy. Why should I not be able to record any conversation to which I'm a party? Maybe my memory is not so good. Am I being discriminated against? If I reply to an email, do I have to get the approval of the other party in order to post that email? The laws are screwy with respect to where a call originates and where the other party is during the call.
It should be up to us, the end users, to determine whether the recording is legal and the phone should be capable of recording the conversation. I don't like that the phone is crippled with respect to recording a call. Let me make the choice.
When must you get permission from everyone involved before recording?
Twelve states require the consent of every party to a phone call or conversation in order to make the recording lawful. These "two-party consent" laws have been adopted in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington (Hawai'i is also in general a one-party state, but requires two-party consent if the recording device is installed in a private place). Although they are referred to as "two-party consent" laws, consent must be obtained from every party to a phone call or conversation if it involves more than two people. In some of these states, it might be enough if all parties to the call or conversation know that you are recording and proceed with the communication anyway, even if they do not voice explicit consent. See the State Law: Recording section of this legal guide for information on specific states' wiretapping laws.
I rooted my phone with Root De La Vega to preserve the Knox flag for warranty purposes .. then I installed Xposed with the Wanam module and enabled the hidden built in system call recording and it worked perfectly.
It sounds involved, but it's worth it for a whole lot of advantageous reasons including the call recording.
I would suspect that you can record anything you want to which you're a party to the conversation. Using that recording in any may require consent from the other party.
Usually I record things like changing airline reservations. You'll note that when you call any service you get a pre-message which states "this call may be recorded for quality purposes". To me, that means the other party has released their expectation of privacy. Why should I not be able to record any conversation to which I'm a party? Maybe my memory is not so good. Am I being discriminated against? If I reply to an email, do I have to get the approval of the other party in order to post that email? The laws are screwy with respect to where a call originates and where the other party is during the call.
It should be up to us, the end users, to determine whether the recording is legal and the phone should be capable of recording the conversation. I don't like that the phone is crippled with respect to recording a call. Let me make the choice.