Also interesting is the fact that in this very thread there has been, for the most part, an even number of people praising the Mod team vs complaining. I suspect, but have not confirmed, that some of those complaining have run afoul of the forum rules.
That's not really a fair thing to throw at those people and in my opinion bears some resemblance to profiling. I've seen all kinds of misbehavior from moderators both on mobile nations and many other other forums. People are people and there's good and bad apples everywhere. I used to moderate for Bioware Entertainment once upon a time many many moons ago and things were pretty much the same then as they are now. The difference being that misbehaving moderators generally are fired pretty quickly when the forums belong to a big company with an eye on customer retention. From my experience here's what I've seen from the bad apples both when I was a moderator and as a member of various forums in the years since:
power tripping: self explanatory.
hounding: By this I mean the practice of numerous moderators "red flagging" a forum member for criticizing overzealous moderation, ganging up on that member and then using the exact letter of the law with zero discretion or leeway to build up infraction points on them. It happens, and it's not subtle no matter how much the mods who engage in this practice attempt to deny it. I've seen it as a mod, and have seen it as a member for years, to this date. It's a reprehensible tactic, made worse by the fact that every forum has a "moderator eyes only" section wherein I've seen them high-5 each other when they do this and make disparaging remarks about that person like a group of high school bullies.
Back slapping: The practice of moderators liking/thanking each other's posts in instances when there is a disagreement between them and member(s). I understand the whole "solidarity" thing guys, but honestly I've always felt the optics of it sends a poor message.
One-sided pre-judgement: No offense but an example of this is in this very thread. Whenever I hear the words "I back up my moderator team fully" I cringe. The reason I cringe is that in a vast majority of cases that has more often than not translated into "You're presumed guilty and have a very small chance of me giving you a fair hearing no matter how unfair or heavy handed my moderator was."
I'm not accusing you of that, I'm simply reporting how I've seen that term pan out over the years. I can remember one case years ago where a forum administrator actually asked me to write a humble hat-in-hand "heartfelt" (his words) appeal to his mod team leader who basically behaved like a petulant child in order to revoke a ban. Needless to say that didn't happen. My logins and IP from that point forward all came from some European town I've never heard of.
Stepping in: In cases when there has been a disagreement between a mod and member in a thread, is it really necessary for a second mod to come in swinging as well when the first mod is fully capable of dealing with it? No. It is not. See points 1 and 2.
Anyway, I'm just passing time and blowing air. Forums and chatrooms have been this way ever since people have discovered they can speak differently to you from the guaranteed physical safety of the internet than they would in person. There is always going to be misbehavior from both members and moderators folks. It's one of the cardinal rules of the Internet. Either accept it, or have an infinite number of IP's and geographical locations at your disposal.
Overall I'd rate the Android Central mod team pretty good out of the other MN sites, and haven't really seen anything to indicate they're not pretty easy going.