http://www.androidcentral.com/editorial-now-we-know-why-apple-went-after-samsung-courtroom
Even after reading this recent article I'm still confused as to what exactly apples claim against samsung is. Best I seem to have been able to conclude has been that their doing nothing more than the if you can't beat them sue the out of the market game. Considering all of the recent suits from various sources against others that are not legitimate suits since a lot of stuff that has been patented technically are things that are not patentable by definition. But then this stuff with apple doesn't even seem to be that but simply them trying to pull the wool over the courts eyes by deceiving them with doctored docs and such. Can anyone explain the details so us patent/ legal system challenged folks can grasp why apple thinks they have a legitimate suit against samsung?
Even after reading this recent article I'm still confused as to what exactly apples claim against samsung is. Best I seem to have been able to conclude has been that their doing nothing more than the if you can't beat them sue the out of the market game. Considering all of the recent suits from various sources against others that are not legitimate suits since a lot of stuff that has been patented technically are things that are not patentable by definition. But then this stuff with apple doesn't even seem to be that but simply them trying to pull the wool over the courts eyes by deceiving them with doctored docs and such. Can anyone explain the details so us patent/ legal system challenged folks can grasp why apple thinks they have a legitimate suit against samsung?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram