Poll: Did Sprint drop the ball on pricing??

[Dre3001]

Now that the release has been announced what do you think about how Sprint did in regards to pricing??

I will be buying one on release day but I worry about this phone being a flop for sprint due to the $250 price tag.


Thoughts?

[mbkowns]

Charged us more and didn't give us a movie or game.

Sprint branded sims would of made epic ... epic


avatar would of been cool also.





I would have gladly liked a lower price of 150 for those two items gone but to charge more without and only demo crap.


f u epic.



2nd


then you charge 10$ data plan to a user who lives in an area without

f u epic.

[Andrew Ruffolo]

nope, its better than the phone thats $50 less. Plus, I don't have to worry about long lines now

[drizek]

Originally Posted by rufflez

nope, its better than the phone thats $50 less. Plus, I don't have to worry about long lines now

Or custom ROMs or accessories, or any of the other nice things that come with a phone that people actually buy.

The EPIC is a good enough phone that people might have actually switched to Sprint for it. The extra $50 is just an extra thing stopping people from coming over. All Sprint gets in return is the satisfaction of pissing off their existing customers.

As far as I'm concerned, they should be giving these 4G phones away on contract. They cover the cost of the phone on the standard contract anyway, but now they get the extra $10/mo from 4G. It is a great way to get people to sign up for 4G service.

[hampstenj]

ummm asphalt 5 isn't a game?????


anyway yes I feel that the extra $50 WILL hurt Sprint BIG TIME. it's a damn good phone that people IMO would go to Sprint over the Droid 2 at VZW, but people will see it cheaper there and go, bingo there's my phone.

[Andrew Ruffolo]

Originally Posted by drizek

Or custom ROMs or accessories, or any of the other nice things that come with a phone that people actually buy.

The EPIC is a good enough phone that people might have actually switched to Sprint for it. The extra $50 is just an extra thing stopping people from coming over. All Sprint gets in return is the satisfaction of pissing off their existing customers.

As far as I'm concerned, they should be giving these 4G phones away on contract. They cover the cost of the phone on the standard contract anyway, but now they get the extra $10/mo from 4G. It is a great way to get people to sign up for 4G service.

Accessories: they are already out there (at least the ones I would buy) and it doesn't need a custom ROM to be functional, which is the reason its replacing my Hero. Considering the GPU still beats the the dual-core Snapdragon's, I find it worth it. Its perfect for me.

[BrianFX]

I suspected $250.

Everyone who is upset with the price needs to think of the financials for Sprint/Samsung. They're including extra hardware features (QWERTY, front-facing cam, rear flash) that the Vibrant & Captivate don't have, all the while serviced on cheaper plans. You can't hit the margins on both sides of the equation (higher spec'd phone & cheaper plans) and expect the phone to be the same price as their competitors.

As soon as I saw that Sprint's Galaxy S would be a QWERTY slider, I knew there would be a price differential relative to the other 3 carriers' Galaxy S models. When it retained the front-facing cam and added a rear flash, it was obvious.

[Dre3001]

Originally Posted by BrianFX

I suspected $250.

Everyone who is upset with the price needs to think of the financials for Sprint/Samsung. They're including extra hardware features (QWERTY, front-facing cam, rear flash) that the Vibrant & Captivate don't have, all the while serviced on cheaper plans. You can't hit the margins on both sides of the equation (higher spec'd phone & cheaper plans) and expect the phone to be the same price as their competitors.

As soon as I saw that Sprint's Galaxy S would be a QWERTY slider, I knew there would be a price differential relative to the other 3 carriers' Galaxy S models. When it retained the front-facing cam and added a rear flash, it was obvious.

Good point

All the Galaxy S phones previously had been priced at 200

The Epic is clearly the best out of them all feature wise so it would only make sense to cost more.

[cary328is]

Super AMOLED with 16.5 million colors, faster CPU and GPU, keyboard...nope. I'm fine with paying $50 more.

[drizek]

Originally Posted by rufflez

Accessories: they are already out there (at least the ones I would buy) and it doesn't need a custom ROM to be functional, which is the reason its replacing my Hero. Considering the GPU still beats the the dual-core Snapdragon's, I find it worth it. Its perfect for me.

That still doesn't justify the price. The bottom line is that Sprint is ripping us off. I like to get a new phone every year, but if the prices keep creeping up it stops being so easy to justify it. I'm going to buy it anyway, but I still think it is a rip off. It's like my iPad, it shouldn't cost more than $350 or so, but I love it and would buy it again for 500.

The EPIC costs samsung, at most, $10 more to manufacture than a Captivate. Keep in mind that they are gimping the ROM from 16GB down to just 1GB. Cutting the memory easily covers the cost of the 4G chip. The LED on the back probably costs somewhere between 0.9 cents and 1.3 cents, the camera on the front is probably a dollar. The keyboard rounds out the rest of the 10 dollars, and I'm being generous. Keep in mind that the Epic is made out of cheaper materials than the metal on the captivate, with that cool sliding battery cover.