Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 35
Like Tree4Likes
  1. Thread Author  Thread Author    #1  
    SdotA85's Avatar

    Posts
    27 Posts
    Global Posts
    230 Global Posts

    Default Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Wirefly Review

  2. #2  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Video is Meh...but hopefully this means we'll see some real reviews soon.
  3. #3  
    JayWill's Avatar

    Posts
    2,301 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,306 Global Posts
    ROM
    CM9

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by RyTyFern View Post
    Video is Meh...but hopefully this means we'll see some real reviews soon.
    Hehe I don't disagree, but at least it's something to wet our whistles.

    Even this guy is hung up on WVGA vs. qHD. Yet he fails to mention that the SAMOLED+ screen has 50% more sub-pixels. Ah well, I'm not going to get into the resolution debate again.

    Nice to see the Mali-400MP GPU on the Quadrant system information. Some visual confirmation there, along with the ARMv7 architecture on the CPU. Definitely the Exynos 4210 SOC running in there.

    3K+ Quadrant is in line with International benchmarks.

    I'm looking forward to more phones getting into more reviewer's hands.
  4. #4  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Two things to notice in the video are quadrant saw only one of the two cores and smartbench 2011 didn't install on the device. Does anyone know if internation GSII had same behavior with these apps? If not, then what changed here?
  5. #5  
    JayWill's Avatar

    Posts
    2,301 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,306 Global Posts
    ROM
    CM9

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by taylormah View Post
    Two things to notice in the video are quadrant saw only one of the two cores and smartbench 2011 didn't install on the device. Does anyone know if internation GSII had same behavior with these apps? If not, then what changed here?
    Quadrant only showing one core is expected, but Smartbench 2011 has been run on the International version.

    Not sure why the guy couldn't install it. Maybe he goofed somehow. Or maybe it doesn't play nice with something Sprint installed. Guess we'll find out soon enough.
  6. #6  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by JayWill72 View Post
    Quadrant only showing one core is expected,
    Is it quadrants incompatibility with dual core cpu's or just exynos?
  7. #7  
    JayWill's Avatar

    Posts
    2,301 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,306 Global Posts
    ROM
    CM9

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quadrant doesn't recognize dual cores ... yet.
  8. #8  

    Default

    Just goes to show how interested I am in this phone that I watched that whole video. Didn't hear half of what he said, but I was interested in the specs and the quadrant was interesting. As far as the screen goes I only care if I like the way it looks and to me it's gorgeous.
  9. #9  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    i just wanna keep watching that video with the sound off just to get some good looks at my new phone. lol
    graffix31 likes this.
  10. #10  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    A sweet device come on September 16th
    I LOVE MY AT&T GALAXY NOTE II
    graffix31 likes this.
  11. #11  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    This was "part 1" of...?
  12. #12  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by sweetmonster457 View Post
    This was "part 1" of...?
    I'm guessing 3
    I LOVE MY AT&T GALAXY NOTE II
  13. #13  
    oversteer325's Avatar

    Posts
    164 Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    That phone is completely unbranded on the front. It doesn't even say Samsung like all of the ones at the release event. I hope they do this on the production model. It makes the front look so clean!
    Thanked by:
    cfbauer likes this.
  14. #14  
    STL 314's Avatar

    Posts
    278 Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    review was good cant wait for part 2

    Quadrant score was great
  15. #15  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oversteer325 View Post
    That phone is completely unbranded on the front. It doesn't even say Samsung like all of the ones at the release event. I hope they do this on the production model. It makes the front look so clean!
    All that is on the back of the phone.
  16. #16  
    STL 314's Avatar

    Posts
    278 Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by thekarens View Post
    All that is on the back of the phone.
    at the samsung event the samsung logo was on the top front of the device....looks better with everything on the back
  17. #17  
    JayWill's Avatar

    Posts
    2,301 Posts
    Global Posts
    2,306 Global Posts
    ROM
    CM9

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by oversteer325 View Post
    That phone is completely unbranded on the front. It doesn't even say Samsung like all of the ones at the release event. I hope they do this on the production model. It makes the front look so clean!
    Good catch. I hadn't even noticed that.
  18. #18  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by STL 314 View Post
    at the samsung event the samsung logo was on the top front of the device....looks better with everything on the back
    no kidding, that means when I put a case on it I won't see any logos which is more than fine by me
  19. #19  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by oversteer325 View Post
    That phone is completely unbranded on the front. It doesn't even say Samsung like all of the ones at the release event. I hope they do this on the production model. It makes the front look so clean!
    hah, didnt see that until you pointed that out!

    #NICE
  20. #20  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Oh wow nice catch. Looks WAY better without the Sammy logo on the front.
  21. #21  
    Dreamliner330's Avatar

    Posts
    765 Posts
    Global Posts
    771 Global Posts
    ROM
    100% AOSP/AOKP wanted.

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by JayWill72 View Post
    Even this guy is hung up on WVGA vs. qHD. Yet he fails to mention that the SAMOLED+ screen has 50% more sub-pixels. Ah well, I'm not going to get into the resolution debate again.
    Does it translate into seeing more on the screen than qHD? Can I see more of a vertical space of a webpage than qHD? Holy Crap! Look a the size of that 'media volume' pop-up!

    It will be interesting if I can see the 'screen door' effect on this phone like every other AMOLED and PenTile screen I've seen...
    Last edited by dreamliner; 09-07-2011 at 11:58 PM.
  22. #22  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by dreamliner View Post
    Does it translate into seeing more on the screen than qHD? Can I see more of a vertical space of a webpage than qHD? Holy Crap! Look a the size of that 'media volume' pop-up!

    It will be interesting if I can see the 'screen door' effect on this phone like every other AMOLED and PenTile screen I've seen...
    This device does not have a pentile screen, but epic 4g had, so it should look better. And no, you would see less content on screen than what a qHD will show. See this post for a comparison shot.
  23. #23  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by taylormah View Post
    This device does not have a pentile screen, but epic 4g had, so it should look better. And no, you would see less content on screen than what a qHD will show. See this post for a comparison shot.
    I dont know why people care about qhd so much, root ur phone and install lcd density changer and ull see allot more
  24. #24  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Quote Originally Posted by dkotoric View Post
    I dont know why people care about qhd so much, root ur phone and install lcd density changer and ull see allot more
    In a time where top-hardware crown goes from device to device in a matter of few months, everyone would want to at least stay in the game for at least few months down the road. If one is spending top dollar, one would expect top-specifications in areas he prefers most. Only thing is that for someone screen size is more important, for other processing power, and for another SAMOLED+ etc etc.. You may not care about resolution, and I don't care much about it either, but maybe someone else does. For me, screen size and SAMOLED+ are more important than resolution, so I already preordered, but for someone else resolution or camera button maybe far more important, so they may pass over this device. But I agree, if someone really wants this phone AND higher resolution AND has the balls to experiment, then root and install density changer.
  25. #25  

    Default Re: Samsung Epic 4G Touch Review - Part 1

    Are the dual processors asynchronous like the EVO 3D or do both processors work together at the same time?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions