11-07-2012 02:34 PM
- I just spend over two hours at Best Buy trying to get a new Galaxy Note 2. Turns out they can't sell me one because of some Sprint exclusivity that doesn't show up anywhere except when they try to go through the purchase transaction. But aside from that, we had to call Sprint 3 times before they would even activate the phone!
According to them, because I have a discounted Family Plan+ or somesuch plan, I can only upgrade via a Sprint corporate store. Problem is that Sprint has no financing available. I have a Best Buy credit card with no interest and payments for 18 months, and so wanted to buy it through them. I'm already paying $100 to Sprint to buy up my eligibility to upgrade early, I can't afford to shell out another $300 for this expensive phone on top of that and pay all of this up front in cash.
The odd thing is that two weeks ago I went to Best Buy and got my wife a Galaxy SIII. She's on the same plan as me of course, and the Sprint rep that Best Buy called (there system was down) did the activation without issue. Today, the first two reps gave the same answer, and the third finally allowed it.
So I guess I have a couple of questions. First, is this a real policy, and if so, why is it enforced by some but apparently can be ignored by others. Is it just one of those things that Sprint is not on top of and so you just have to keep calling them to find a rep that doesn't know of it? Secondly, why on earth does this policy exist? Seems like for those of us who are lucky enough to have a discounted plan, we have to get punished by not allowing us to buy the phone we want where we want. It's a huge hassle that makes me just want to give up on Sprint. It feels very anti-customer.
Can anyone help answer these questions? I'd appreciate it!11-06-2012 06:43 PM
- bblazeAndroid Powered HumanIt probably has something to do with who the primary is on the account. Sprint is very weird about those types of things. Before they ditched their premier program, only the primary account holder could upgrade after 1 year while all other line holders needed to wait the full 2 years. That's the reason I recently left Sprint. They took away my "upgrade after a year" plan. I would have gladly shoveled money at them for another 2 years to upgrade after the 1 year, but NOOOOOO. Now they get nothing. Long story short, Sprint is funny with who they deal with on account/phone upgrades.11-06-2012 06:52 PM
- It probably has something to do with who the primary is on the account. Sprint is very weird about those types of things. Before they ditched their premier program, only the primary account holder could upgrade after 1 year while all other line holders needed to wait the full 2 years. That's the reason I recently left Sprint. They took away my "upgrade after a year" plan. I would have gladly shoveled money at them for another 2 years to upgrade after the 1 year, but NOOOOOO. Now they get nothing. Long story short, Sprint is funny with who they deal with on account/phone upgrades.11-06-2012 07:12 PM
- 11-07-2012 01:05 PM
- I've run into this problem before. It has something to do with newly released high end phones. It's not that they don't want you to buy it from a retailer, it has more to do with availability.
The premise is that they get more exposure to customers from other carriers at retailers like Best Buy. For example, someone on VZW has his contract up and happens to be shopping at a Best Buy. He walks by the cell phone section, sees the Note 2 for Sprint, impulsively picks it up and goes and now Sprint has another subscriber.
Now, typically customers on special plans to tend to be either long time customers, or they're not likely to go anywhere. So Sprint prefers they not go into a retailer and eat up all its inventory. Can't have impulse purchases when there are no phones in stock; most people will just say nevermind. Retailers have a limited number of phones where a Sprint Corp store can get a case in overnight.
So yeah, it is an inconvenience you can't use a BB credit card in this situation, but it's a business/marketing decision that makes sense.11-07-2012 01:06 PM
- Darth Mo,
I'd agree with some of what you say, but at least with the Note 2, by the time BB starts selling it for Sprint, two of the other three main carriers will already have it selling through BB as well. The only carrier who won't is Verizon, who will have it about two weeks later. I know that maybe that's not typical, but I also know that in general most of the carriers, save for maybe Tmobile, have had fairly equivelent types of phones. Sure occasionally there's a novelty like the EVO 3D or the Kyocera phone that had two screens, but mostly people will see generally the same from from carrier to carrier.
In a way, loyal customers are essentially being punished because Sprint doesn't regard them as valuable as a new customer. I know this is the case already in that Sprint will offer better prices on phones to someone switching. But allowing a customer to buy a phone where they want seems to be a pretty arbitrary restriction to inflict on someone. I wonder if this is duplicated by any of the other carriers...11-07-2012 02:10 PM
I'll give you that for cell phones since you get something physical (the phone itself) that it seems different, but from a financial standpoint, it's all the same.11-07-2012 02:34 PM
- By Kylelipp787 in forum General Help and How ToReplies: 15Last Post: 09-30-2012, 09:42 PM
- By flock in forum Acer Iconia A500Replies: 0Last Post: 09-06-2011, 07:15 PM
- By jetski12390 in forum Samsung MomentReplies: 2Last Post: 05-20-2010, 09:39 PM
- By Rickbubello in forum Motorola DroidReplies: 13Last Post: 02-20-2010, 01:43 PM
- By Ter1990 in forum HTC Droid ErisReplies: 6Last Post: 01-23-2010, 03:47 PM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD