- 06-09-2012, 12:32 PM
Thread Author #1
- 06-09-2012, 12:47 PM #2
Re: How Sammy will slam Apple over LTE
Why wait for an LTE iPhone? Go after the LTE iPad.
a.k.a. RyZR from HoFo
Motorola DROID Bionic (6.7.246.XT865.Verizon.en.US, Ice Cream Sandwich 4.0.4)
Google Nexus 7 (JDQ39, Jelly Bean 4.2.2)
What other devices have I had? Here's my phone timeline.
Support your favorite Android app and game developers. Pay for apps! And don't block ads! - 06-09-2012, 02:14 PM #3
Samsung deff needs to use that as leverage. Samsung has already showed it has balls by directing every aspect of the release of GS3 for the US markets. Instead of having provider variants of the GS3 like the iPhone each provider has the same. This will allow the consumer to determine for themselves which provider has the better network.
Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums - 06-09-2012, 02:32 PM #4
Re: How Sammy will slam Apple over LTE
Apple is going to find that the old saying "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is true. They're going to have every other mobile manufacturer in the world lined up against them. Yes they've got deep pockets, but are they that deep?
- 06-09-2012, 02:37 PM #5
Re: How Sammy will slam Apple over LTE
Apple buyers are gonna find that the high prices of any Apple equipment stems from their outrageous use of lawyers.
Thanked by 2: - 06-09-2012, 02:48 PM #6
Re: How Sammy will slam Apple over LTE
Question is, who owns the other 90% of LTE patents? Does Apple own any sminal related LTE patents or joint own through NORTEL patents? Are the Samsung patents under FRAND? Lots of questions that article failed to cover or explain.
- 06-09-2012, 03:12 PM #7
- 06-09-2012, 03:31 PM #8
- 06-09-2012, 03:47 PM #9
- 06-09-2012, 04:01 PM #10
- 06-09-2012, 04:46 PM #11
- 06-09-2012, 05:25 PM #12
- 06-09-2012, 06:12 PM #13
Too lazy to do that. But I'm sure 90% of them are $550-$650 for new model phones. Exception is the gnex at $399 for the GSM. The GS3 will be around $650-$700 off contract. For 32GB, then add $50-$100 bucks for a 64GB card and you get 96GB for $50 cheaper than a 64GB iPhone.
Edit: Here's a sandisk 64GB for 72.99.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B005V7WIA2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 - 06-09-2012, 06:23 PM #14
- 06-09-2012, 06:38 PM #15
They are the most valuable company in the WORLD I think they can cover a couple lawyers... Don't get me wrong I'm not sticking up for apple and am not a fanboy of android or iOS I like them equally just sum threads like this make me wanna smash my head of a wall it's business they are doing this because it's the smart thing to do deal with it....end of rage rant...
Sent via tapatalk - 06-09-2012, 07:02 PM #16
- 06-09-2012, 07:43 PM #17
The iPhone 4 came out in 2010. I hope it wouldn't be more expensive than a new android phone off contract. They all are great phones. All this legal stuff is b.s
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Android Central Forums - 06-09-2012, 07:52 PM #18
But as we know in the court of public opinion, opinions change quickly. Especially when they become one of the 1%. IPhone has become stale even with iPhone 5 coming. It used to be you would combat competitors with better tech but apple just doesn't seem to have any original ideas.
Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums - 06-09-2012, 08:02 PM #19
So if Samsung tries to shut Apple down with litigation is that ok?
Everyone hates Apple because of litigation says it's BS and to let innovation decide the smartphone wars.
Do we apply a double standard and say it's ok for Samsung? Do we love Samsung for doing the same thing we vilify Apple for? Do two wrongs make a right?
Just curious.
Sent from my DROID RAZR MAXX via Tapatalk 2Thanked by 2: - 06-09-2012, 09:03 PM #20
- 06-09-2012, 09:43 PM #21
Most deff not but Samsung's litigation I think has just been in response to Apple's litigious nature. I think if apple could find a way to sue competitors over the use of the letter "a" they would on the grounds that the letter in question was proprietary and any use without the expressed written consent of Apple is strictly prohibited.
Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums - 06-09-2012, 09:56 PM #22
Very good point you make here, would Samsung stoop down to Apple's level if its found the iPhone 5 infringes on Sammy's LTE patents? Yes I believe so and its not just because Samsung would want revenge but I think it would also be Samsung wanting to teach Apple a valuable lesson on how to compete as a buisness.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Android Central Forums - 06-09-2012, 10:28 PM #23
Re: How Sammy will slam Apple over LTE
- 06-09-2012, 11:03 PM #24
Re: How Sammy will slam Apple over LTE
you know, i keep seeing statements like this and anyone that really beleves this is thinking with their emotions and not logic. Apple made the mp3, smartphone, tablet, tv boxtop and ultrabook categories what they are today. Is it a coincidence that Apple happens to dominate all those categories, save for cell phones, in which case it is about even with Samsung. And I don't buy the whole "isheep" mantra. While there are crazy devoted Apple lovers, there def aren't a quarter of a billion of them in this world.
As for original ideas, Jon Ivy has been one of, if not the, most influential designer/engineer within the mobile tech industry in recent memory. You think for one moment that if any other tech company could lure Ivy away from Apple that they wouldn't take the opportunity? How many "ultrabooks" look like the Macbook Air? How many boxtops look like the Apple TV? How many tablets followed the design of the iPad?
I'm not one of the Apple faithful, but I recognize the contributions to the field of tech. - 06-09-2012, 11:08 PM #25
Yeah, anyone disagrees with you must not be using logic.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket SGH-i727 on ATT LTE



Reply




































