Pro:
Cheap.
Cons:
Everything else.
There are websites devoted to gathering complaints about Cricket service, customer service, etc. And there are thousands and thousands of complaints. If you think Verizon is bad (IMO they are), switch to Cricket and you'll wish you were with Verizon.
Good:
Cheap
CDMA (for those who prefer it)
Good coverage where they have good coverage. (Better than "Joe's Cell Service", anyway.)
Bad:
CDMA (for those who get seasick with weak CDMA signals)
Mostly bad coverage except where there are concentrations of people. They're number 4 (out of 4) for the amount of area covered (at all - even voice) by a large margin.
Most of the stores are independent, and the employees don't know any more about cellphones or the system than you do, so if you need help, you have to come here. (Better than Straight Talk, like having your leg torn off is better than being shot in the head.)
Would I use Sprint? No. Should you? That's up to you.
Good:
Cheap
CDMA (for those who prefer it)
Good coverage where they have good coverage. (Better than "Joe's Cell Service", anyway.)
Bad:
CDMA (for those who get seasick with weak CDMA signals)
Mostly bad coverage except where there are concentrations of people. They're number 4 (out of 4) for the amount of area covered (at all - even voice) by a large margin.
Most of the stores are independent, and the employees don't know any more about cellphones or the system than you do, so if you need help, you have to come here. (Better than Straight Talk, like having your leg torn off is better than being shot in the head.)
Would I use Sprint? No. Should you? That's up to you.
Similar to how Metro PCS is to T-Mobile, except Metro actually owned some towers and bandwidth. Cricket never owned squat except for their crummy stores.
Actually that's not true. Cricket did own spectrum, and had their own CDMA network before everything was absorbed into AT&T.