Samsung i9300 benchmarks - NOT number one?

[Savbers]

Huawei's Ascend D Quad just beat out the Galaxy S III in Antutu Benchmark.

Huawei's Ascend D Quad (U9510)
Parameters:
Network: GSM, WCDMA
CPU: Hisilicon K3V2 1.5GHz
Screen size and resolution: 720x1280 pixels, 4.5 inches
Camera pixels: front: 1.3 million pixel, back: 8 million pixel
Memory:1GB RAM
GPS: Built-in GPS, A-GPS support
System: Android 4.0

AnTuTu benchmark score:
Memory performance score: 2604
CPU integer performance score: 4300
CPU floating point performance score: 3335
2D graphics performance score: 300
3D graphics performance score: 1269
Database IO performance score: 550
SD card write speed score: 150
SD card read speed score: 193
Total: 12701

Samsung's Galaxy SIII (i9300)
Parameters:
Network: GSM/WCDMA
CPU: Exynos 4212 1.5GHz
Screen size and resolution: 1280x720 pixels, 4.7 inches
Camera pixels: front: 2 million pixel back: 12 million pixel
Memory: 1GB RAM
GPS: Built-in GPS, A-GPS support
System: Android 4.0

AnTutu benchmark score:
Memory performance score: 2483
CPU integer performance score:3996
CPU floating point performance score: 3030
2D graphics performance score: 149
3D graphics performance score: 1247
Database IO performance score: 540
SD card write speed score: 120
SD card read speed score: 196
Total: 11761 (on the ranking list this is now ranked as 12158)

Huawei SMOKED Samsung in almost every category!

OK, so the Huawei might beat out Samsung in a BENCHMARK. Truth is Samsung has added much, much more than Huawei has and real-life usage will be more consumer friendly on the Galaxy SIII.

Check the ranking to see where they all sit.

 

[anon(94115)]

Bechmarks are useless, completely useless.....

Not defending either phone, don't really care.

 

[Savbers]

Bechmarks are useless, completely useless.....

Not defending either phone, don't really care.

They're still fun to compare phones!

 

[hell911]

benchmarks are important, not going to explain, go read articles about benchmarks.

 

[Kevin OQuinn]

benchmarks are important, not going to explain, go read articles about benchmarks.

Did you mean to say benchmarks are NOT important? I hope so, because they aren't. The only time they can be useful is when comparing different ROMs/kernels on the same phone. Otherwise it doesn't necessarily equate to a faster real world experience on the device itself.

 

[hell911]

for me its important, for others i dont know.

 

[Kevin OQuinn]

I wasn't trying to sound harsh, and if I did I apologize.

They can give a RELATIVE representation of performance, but given different types of RAM, screen resolutions, and software differences it's hard to say that because it's faster at a benchmark that it'll be faster at real world tasks.

 

[NikolaOvcharski]

I've got 11983 in AnTuTu from SGSIII.