skycross
Well-known member
The first day I got my original X2 it fell from my lap onto concrete and it nicked the side. It didn't shatter the glass but the new device had this huge imperfection for life. I was livid but at the same time I new it was my fault for not having a case. The day I got my DNA i didn't leave the store until I had it in a OEM case. Looking at the verizon case I saw several areas where the glass edge was not protected so I immediately started researching cases and ordered a Sideo (which I love) so the phone would have a chance of surviving the fall. I still worry about the phone because its not housed in a otterbox or another seriously rugged case but I cant stand how big those make the device so I got insurance and will be extra careful.
Do I have any expectation that this phone could survive any type of fall? No. Its common sense. If that was my concern I would not have purchased a DNA. I think it is not unreasonable for a manufacture to expect the consumer to make an educated decision about the device they purchase. I don't need a rating to know how fragile a device would be. I do expect the device to be mostly bug free and expect the device to survive normal ware and tear. Dropping the device is an accident which is simply not normal usage. To expect the manufacture to support that type of normal use I expect the phone to look like it has a otterbox built into the housing.
My fiance pre-ordered the S4 and we will have the case here next week in anticipation for its arrival. Sorry.. but this IMO is common sense. If these types of ratings increase the price of the device at all I think it is a waste of money. Consumers learn these lessons the hard way but I have yet to buy a cellphone where the salesperson hasn't expressed the importance of getting a case to protect the investment. Not what the OP wants to hear but its your fault that screen got shattered.. not HTC's.
Do I have any expectation that this phone could survive any type of fall? No. Its common sense. If that was my concern I would not have purchased a DNA. I think it is not unreasonable for a manufacture to expect the consumer to make an educated decision about the device they purchase. I don't need a rating to know how fragile a device would be. I do expect the device to be mostly bug free and expect the device to survive normal ware and tear. Dropping the device is an accident which is simply not normal usage. To expect the manufacture to support that type of normal use I expect the phone to look like it has a otterbox built into the housing.
My fiance pre-ordered the S4 and we will have the case here next week in anticipation for its arrival. Sorry.. but this IMO is common sense. If these types of ratings increase the price of the device at all I think it is a waste of money. Consumers learn these lessons the hard way but I have yet to buy a cellphone where the salesperson hasn't expressed the importance of getting a case to protect the investment. Not what the OP wants to hear but its your fault that screen got shattered.. not HTC's.