Results 1 to 20 of 20
- 12-16-2011, 07:25 PM
Thread Author #1
Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
I know its not the end of the world but i expected more snap out of this processor. What are you guys getting? Thoughts?
- 12-16-2011, 07:27 PM #2
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
I don't use Quadrant do get anything done, so....I don't care about it's Quadrant score. The phone seems pretty awesome to me so far.
Please use the Thanks button below and to the right. - 12-16-2011, 07:28 PM #3
- 12-16-2011, 07:35 PM #4
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
Quadrant is useless. Try to use a newer benchmark program.
- 12-16-2011, 08:03 PM #5
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
My understanding is that Quadrant is not optimized for ICS. So the scores dont mean much.
- 12-16-2011, 08:10 PM #6
- 12-16-2011, 08:14 PM #7
- 12-16-2011, 08:14 PM #8
- 12-16-2011, 08:27 PM #9
- 12-16-2011, 08:58 PM #10
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
Ran this on my boss phone this morning, scores were much lower than anticpated.
In system information the processor shows 1200MHz capable,but showed 350MHz both times I ran the benchmark .
Thoughts welcome. . . Or would like to see a score from someone who can run it at full speed - 12-16-2011, 09:02 PM #11
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
Dont care abouth benchmarks, ICS was designed and optimized for this phone, it will play any game on the current market without issue, and there is hardly any lag.
There is no reason for benchmarks imo - 12-16-2011, 09:17 PM #12
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
People still use quadrant? Really?
It's not even optimized for dual core processors, not to mention 4.0.
Quadrant is absolutely useless. It would be like if I wanted to run 3DMark 2002 on my dual-core Dell notebook from 2010. Or if I wanted to run SiSoft SANDRA 2003 on my Core i7 iMac.
Silliness... - 12-16-2011, 10:13 PM #13
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
Quadrant isn't updated for ics devices yet. Plus do you need a high score to go show off to people? is it not snappy enough or are you just one of "those guys" who thinks his phone is better just because it has a higher score?
- 12-16-2011, 10:27 PM
Thread Author #14
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
Tough crowd! I wasnt aware quadrant was no good for ics. I was mentioning because i thought msybe mine was a dud. Thanks heroes
- 12-16-2011, 10:41 PM #15
Quadrant isn't optimized for ICS yet, try antutu or smartbench
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk - 12-16-2011, 10:42 PM #16
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
Do these benchmark scores even have any meaning? You have a dual core phone, you'll survive.
- 12-16-2011, 10:43 PM #17
- 12-16-2011, 11:50 PM #18
Re: Quadrant scores? 1600 is weak!
jesus, you guys act like you have never done a f-ing quadrant benchmark!!!! it has over a million downloads!! cut the guy some slack. why would you not want to run a benchmark? why do sports cars always provide 0-60 numbers? holy crap.
OP. i guess you have realized now quadrant is not really relevant anymore. there are others as mentioned above to try - 12-17-2011, 07:18 AM #19
- 12-17-2011, 07:21 AM #20



Reply



































