Those of you with the DNA and the rezound can you give us the dbm numbers between the two? Also this battery life you guys speak of is any of it on wifi or is it on LTE, then next since it was stated you guys were given the phones to test and play with in order to answer questions and help HTC with marketing this phone it makes one leery of if all is being 100% truthful or maybe best to say being conservative over some of the real world use. We all know HTC is in some financial difficulties and this could be there savior and again it could be what kills them. What we all wish for is real/world results and honest facts. Not saying any of you are being dishonest just don't wanna hear a sales pitch to buy this phone when in reality my rezound works flawlessly
I was one of lucky ones. We were given the phones to help generate some buzz. For me I would feel funny saying anything bad about the phone, luckily, there are not too many negatives - the biggest negative to me is storage space (you may actually need to manage it).
The battery life (coming from a rezound) is outstanding, truly amazing.The battery size has a lot of people concerned, and, given HTC's track record, they are skeptical. I would be too, if I didn't have one in hand. The rated standby time and usage times for the DNA are quite a bit better than the rezound.
Honestly, if you are happy with the rezound, I would keep it. I know I would have kept mine. My plan was to wait until my upgrade was up, and then, evaluate all of the current models to see if there was something significantly better. The DNA comes really close (either more internal memory, or a SD card slot and, it would have been really terrific). The DNA is much more energy efficient than the rezound, and, I think we can look forward to more phones that are more energy efficient. If you were not in the mode to immediately upgrade, I would wait. There is always something better coming. But, if you are looking in the near futue, I think the DNA deserves top consideration.