The Price is Killing Me

.46caliber

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2010
740
44
0
Visit site
$749? Really?

OK, I get it. Top notch phone. $499 is pretty much the least I've seen for what is generally accepted as a current "Superphone." $599 I can still see, especially with the addition of the LTE chipset. But $749, my gosh. $600 is what CEO of Moto said a WiFi-only Xoom would cost. $799 for the Verizon network version.

I want away from Motorola and the lockdown practice. I probably will start buying phones outright since VZW doesn't do quarterly upgrades, I know right? But cripes. $749?!?! I hope it wont' be staying at that price for too long especially since Dual-Core Snapdraggon phones aren't far off and they just announced a Quad-Core Snapdraggon at MWC.

$749. I think if anyone can bend me over for $749 and make me like it, HTC can, but it's still mean.
 

blizz419

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2011
283
16
0
Visit site
$749? Really?

OK, I get it. Top notch phone. $499 is pretty much the least I've seen for what is generally accepted as a current "Superphone." $599 I can still see, especially with the addition of the LTE chipset. But $749, my gosh. $600 is what CEO of Moto said a WiFi-only Xoom would cost. $799 for the Verizon network version.

I want away from Motorola and the lockdown practice. I probably will start buying phones outright since VZW doesn't do quarterly upgrades, I know right? But cripes. $749?!?! I hope it wont' be staying at that price for too long especially since Dual-Core Snapdraggon phones aren't far off and they just announced a Quad-Core Snapdraggon at MWC.

$749. I think if anyone can bend me over for $749 and make me like it, HTC can, but it's still mean.


from what i understand Best buy always jacks up the full retail price and there was a VZW screenshot that showed a retail of $615
 

DJBeanPole

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2011
877
73
0
Visit site
Exactly. We've already seen the screenshot clearly showing that Verizon's price is $615. Not $749.

Lets hope. $749 is ridiculous. Wouldn't even make me bat an eye at that price. I'd rather take that money and upgrade my old PC sitting in my office haha.
 

DolfanCole

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2010
1,189
105
0
Visit site
Both things I did not know. That makes me feel better. Shame on Best Buy then.

Well, my guess is that when they sell the phone on-contract, they get a kickback from Verizon. When selling off-contract, they don't. So, they transfer the kickback to the customer. That'd explain why it's so much higher than Verizon's retail price.
 

anon(1733)

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2009
2,547
1
0
Visit site
Best buy does jack up the prices. However they do price match. Just bring them something showing Verizon's price and they will match it. I have done this a few times.
 

dubge

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2009
1,106
42
0
Visit site
doesnt BB jack up the price until they get the official price? xoom was listed on BB for $1100 or so until the got the official price
 

westeman

Active member
Aug 29, 2010
26
0
0
Visit site
Best Buy's retail prices are considerably higher than the individual retailer's. Also, I sneaked a peak at Best Buy's mobile Buyer's Guide that they release monthly, (new one comes out this Sunday) and it showed a price of $299.99 on 2yr upgrade. So idk wtf that is about.
 

Cory Streater

Well-known member
Sep 21, 2009
9,495
3,428
0
Visit site
Yeah I've seen them charge upwards of $1,000 for off contract smartphones. They've been doing this for years. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the recent vzw pricing trend has been $579, so this is a $30 increase. With Washington sales tax tacked on, it will be $670 :'(