Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. Thread Author  Thread Author    #1  

    Default Apple and the Thunderbolt

    I'm sure you guys have all heard by now but Intel and Apple are expected to show off their new data transmission technology and rumor has it they will call it Thunderbolt.

    I am sure that this is going to set off a considerable amount of confusion. While Thunderbolt (Apple Version) is rumored to be available only initially on Macbook's, it's reasonable that future versions of the iPhone/iPad will support it.

    I wonder which Thunderbolt makes it to market first.

  2. #2  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thedeceiver View Post
    I'm sure you guys have all heard by now but Intel and Apple are expected to show off their new data transmission technology and rumor has it they will call it Thunderbolt.

    I am sure that this is going to set off a considerable amount of confusion. While Thunderbolt (Apple Version) is rumored to be available only initially on Macbook's, it's reasonable that future versions of the iPhone/iPad will support it.

    I wonder which Thunderbolt makes it to market first.

    I was JUST about to post this. Here's another way to look at it. Apple vehemently defends their trademarks and copyrights. If they are getting into a pissing contest over this... we may be delayed while HTC produces new software, backs, and boxes for Verizon's first LTE phone, the "Lightning Bolt" A few years back they threatened "iphonefans.com" or something to that effect to change their name to "eyephonefans.com"

    Before anybody points it out, I know that VZW continues to advertise the phone...that's the part that doesn't fit.
  3. Thread Author  Thread Author    #3  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leehblanc View Post
    I was JUST about to post this. Here's another way to look at it. Apple vehemently defends their trademarks and copyrights. If they are getting into a pissing contest over this... we may be delayed while HTC produces new software, backs, and boxes for Verizon's first LTE phone, the "Lightning Bolt" A few years back they threatened "iphonefans.com" or something to that effect to change their name to "eyephonefans.com"

    Before anybody points it out, I know that VZW continues to advertise the phone...that's the part that doesn't fit.
    It'd be interesting which one of them has it registered as a Trademark. HTC is definitely going to be able to claim that they were the first to market with the name and that the devices are similar enough (Consumer electronic) that the names may cause confusion.
  4. #4  

    Default

    Apple will force htc to call it the tblow, all while big red, I mean big flame let's the chaos continue.
  5. #5  

    Default

    I thought this phone should have been called the Lightning to start with given the 4G and all. Change it, quick!
  6. #6  

    Default

    Perhaps it should be called the Vapor.
    Thanked by:
    Fronc 
  7. #7  
    themusicmonkey's Avatar

    Posts
    54 Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default

    How about about "Thunder", because it's "all thunder but no lightning/bolt"
    Thanked by:
    Fronc 
  8. #8  

    Default

    I don't think VZW should ever name another phone with regards to the weather, first the Storm, now this.
    Thanked by:
  9. #9  

    Default

    Nice
    Quote Originally Posted by themusicmonkey View Post
    How about about "Thunder", because it's "all thunder but no lightning/bolt"


    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
  10. #10  
    Chris Kerrigan's Avatar

    Posts
    3,878 Posts
    Global Posts
    4,029 Global Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default

    I can guarantee you one thing, if the situation was reversed and Apple had come out with something titled "Thunderbolt" first, they'd be all over HTC and the courts like bread on butter.

    New York Giants | New Jersey Devils | Colorado Avalanche | New York Knicks
  11. #11  

    Default

    I can't wait to see and hear the outcome of this. Hehe.
  12. #12  

    Default trademark

    Well according to the United States Patent and Trademark Office I don't see Apple having that name as a trademark and Verizon filed it back in December of 2010.
    Unless I'm not seeing it correctly then I don't think Apple will have anything to say.
  13. #13  
    TBolt2011's Avatar

    Posts
    696 Posts
    Global Posts
    689 Global Posts
    ROM
    Infected Eternity/stock

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imbacon View Post
    Well according to the United States Patent and Trademark Office I don't see Apple having that name as a trademark and Verizon filed it back in December of 2010.
    Unless I'm not seeing it correctly then I don't think Apple will have anything to say.
    Not that Verizon will do anything about it. Now that they have their precious iPhone, Apple can get away with anything they want short of a company takeover.
    Thunderbolt Saga > Brett Favre Saga
  14. #14  
    joski's Avatar

    Posts
    3 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,184 Global Posts

    Default

    It's too bad. On one hand, it sucks that Verizon probably won't do anything about it, but on the other hand, it's irritating that Apple does SO much about this type of thing that it reminds you of that protective girlfriend you once had in highschool that constantly prods you with HER issues to the point you finally learn to dismiss it because it's so damn typical.

    Yuck.
  15. #15  

    Default

    the funniest thing is that Apple is probably going to benefit big time from the Thunderbolt advertising push paid by Verizon/HTC, considering the Thunderbolt (phone) commercials are rather vague, and the phone is still vaporware.
  16. #16  

    Default They should call it the smoke and mirrors

    They should rename it Smoke and mirror, thats about all we've seen is a few demo phones and from Verizon in announcements nothing.
  17. #17  
    Chris Kerrigan's Avatar

    Posts
    3,878 Posts
    Global Posts
    4,029 Global Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zenit View Post
    the funniest thing is that Apple is probably going to benefit big time from the Thunderbolt advertising push paid by Verizon/HTC, considering the Thunderbolt (phone) commercials are rather vague, and the phone is still vaporware.
    Honestly, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they did that on purpose.

    New York Giants | New Jersey Devils | Colorado Avalanche | New York Knicks
  18. #18  
    Droid800's Avatar
    Banned

    Posts
    3,692 Posts
    Global Posts
    3,706 Global Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default

    So when I get my new HTC Thunderbolt will I be able to hook it up to the Thunderbolt port on my new MacBook Pro? Would doing so cause the universe to collapse in on itself and a vortex of lightning to be created?
  19. #19  
    Raptor007's Avatar

    Posts
    1,932 Posts
    Global Posts
    3,589 Global Posts
    ROM
    Stock .4.1.1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imbacon View Post
    Well according to the United States Patent and Trademark Office I don't see Apple having that name as a trademark and Verizon filed it back in December of 2010.
    Unless I'm not seeing it correctly then I don't think Apple will have anything to say.
    On December 2nd 2010 they decided to register Thunderbolt, there are a total of 44 live registrations for the trademark thunderbolt. I wonder though Verizon may have to point it out to Apple or risk Apple nailing them for lack of trademark enforcement. I have no doubt they would do just that.
  20. #20  
    Droid800's Avatar
    Banned

    Posts
    3,692 Posts
    Global Posts
    3,706 Global Posts
    ROM
    Stock

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imbacon View Post
    Well according to the United States Patent and Trademark Office I don't see Apple having that name as a trademark and Verizon filed it back in December of 2010.
    Unless I'm not seeing it correctly then I don't think Apple will have anything to say.
    Apple may have registered it through a 'fake' company in order to hide the registration from the press. They do it all the time. Either that, or it could be a confidential filing that won't be released for a while.

    There is also the very real possibility that this naming convention was Intel's doing, not Apple's. (The tech is an intel/apple collab. despite the fact that Apple gave the tech to intel in the first place)

Posting Permissions