There is a lot of excitement about the Bionic, and for some good reasons... dual core, qHD display, 4G, etc. I know most of the people reading this forum section are Bionic fans, so please dont shoot me for mentioning the tradeoffs with regard to the Bionic specs.
Most experts seem to be really excited about the Bionic dual core phone, even though it has 512meg memory, so certainly it's got the potential to be a great phone.
But for someone that is holding on to their phone for two years or more, what will be more limiting - 512meg ram on the Bionic dual core phone, or single core processor on the Samsung Stealth/Charge the Thunderbolt, etc?
Please don't turn this into a discussion about all the weaknesses of specific phones. I know the Thunderbolt has some battery issues. I know that people don't like Samsung. There are rumors that Bionic may have some problems also. But all that gets hashed out over and over in the other threads.
So let's focus on the questions at hand...
1) Which would you rather have in your next phone - 756meg RAM or Dual Core?
2) Is the limited RAM a concern for you with the Bionic?
My feeling, to be honest, is that in two years, RAM might be a bigger issue than processor speed. As long as it's fast enough to do video, at least you can use the phone. But lack of RAM seems to lead to crashes and slowdowns on all kinds of portable and desktop devices, and that would be really frustrating. In fact, on my PCs, adding RAM is usually the most important upgrade. It's probably not a problem in the near term for phones, but over the next two or three years as applications become memory hogs all the more, I suspect that RAM could be the limiting factor.
Okay, I tried really hard to start off a legitimate discussion so I can hear what people think. We'll see if people can resist the temptation to slam devices, and stay on topic!
What do you think?
Most experts seem to be really excited about the Bionic dual core phone, even though it has 512meg memory, so certainly it's got the potential to be a great phone.
But for someone that is holding on to their phone for two years or more, what will be more limiting - 512meg ram on the Bionic dual core phone, or single core processor on the Samsung Stealth/Charge the Thunderbolt, etc?
Please don't turn this into a discussion about all the weaknesses of specific phones. I know the Thunderbolt has some battery issues. I know that people don't like Samsung. There are rumors that Bionic may have some problems also. But all that gets hashed out over and over in the other threads.
So let's focus on the questions at hand...
1) Which would you rather have in your next phone - 756meg RAM or Dual Core?
2) Is the limited RAM a concern for you with the Bionic?
My feeling, to be honest, is that in two years, RAM might be a bigger issue than processor speed. As long as it's fast enough to do video, at least you can use the phone. But lack of RAM seems to lead to crashes and slowdowns on all kinds of portable and desktop devices, and that would be really frustrating. In fact, on my PCs, adding RAM is usually the most important upgrade. It's probably not a problem in the near term for phones, but over the next two or three years as applications become memory hogs all the more, I suspect that RAM could be the limiting factor.
Okay, I tried really hard to start off a legitimate discussion so I can hear what people think. We'll see if people can resist the temptation to slam devices, and stay on topic!
What do you think?