07-19-2012 11:14 AM
33 12
tools
  1. Dark_Knight2's Avatar
    Curious about this too. Seems likely.

    Sent from...B*+ch, my $h*+ is custom!
    I made the rom as "safe" as possible. However nothing is 100% fool proof.
    07-16-2012 06:37 PM
  2. Adam G's Avatar
    Did you flash this in an ICS kernel based recovery?
    I'm not even sure what all of this means. I was running your Liquid Ice ROM for a few weeks and it worked great. Kicking myself for fixing something that wasn't broken.
    07-17-2012 08:11 AM
  3. Dark_Knight2's Avatar
    I'm not even sure what all of this means. I was running your Liquid Ice ROM for a few weeks and it worked great. Kicking myself for fixing something that wasn't broken.
    Did you flash this rom using the recovery I included in my liquid ice rom? If so that is your issue in a nut shell.
    07-17-2012 08:49 AM
  4. Adam G's Avatar
    Did you flash this rom using the recovery I included in my liquid ice rom? If so that is your issue in a nut shell.
    Probably. I guess I thought that I could use that recovery to flash whatever ROM.
    07-17-2012 11:01 AM
  5. Dark_Knight2's Avatar
    Probably. I guess I thought that I could use that recovery to flash whatever ROM.
    Negative. Only ones deemed "Safe".
    07-17-2012 09:20 PM
  6. Adam G's Avatar
    Negative. Only ones deemed "Safe".
    What does that mean? Which ROM wasn't safe and who decides that?
    07-18-2012 08:54 AM
  7. Dark_Knight2's Avatar
    What does that mean? Which ROM wasn't safe and who decides that?
    The update-binary inside the META-INF and the wipe data emmc command line inside the updater-script.
    07-18-2012 09:11 AM
  8. Adam G's Avatar
    The update-binary inside the META-INF and the wipe data emmc command line inside the updater-script.

    Oh, that! lol

    I clearly don't know enough to stay out of trouble, so I'll stay away from ROMs in the future. Thanks for your help.
    07-19-2012 11:14 AM
33 12
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD