Ignorant? Can you define the word? Or better yet, allow Google to define it for us:
http://www.google.com/m?hl=en&gl=us...-browser-type&action=devloc&q=define+ignorant
What don't I know? Please enlighten me on Steve Jobs' contribution to society.
Since you'll likely have a very difficult time finding his contributions to public well being, I'll give you my interpretation of the man's accomplishments. Those, I'm sure, someone can elaborate on.
He bought innovation and secured exclusivity on some of the greatest mobile technology (touch screens, screens) making worse the mobile device experience of anyone who wasn't an Apple customer.
Did his impeccable standards drive his engineers to produce products that caused Microsoft and Google step up their game? Yes. Did Steve Jobs make high resolution displays, great touch screens, and exceptional hardware profiles for laptops, phones, and tablets? No. Steve Jobs didn't make the iPhone. He made a brand. Thank the engineers and UX teams. Thank Apple. But Steve Jobs' personal contribution to tech is greatly overstated. His ignorance of humanity's ails were uncommon among the successful and demonstrative of poor character.
I take no pleasure in learning of his death, but he's no better a man in passing than he was last week. It takes an unenlightened man to acquire such wealth, be aware of human suffering, and be oblivious to philanthropy. He deserves little praise outside of the stock holders he enriched.
People who impress me are people who do, not their cheerleaders. People act like we'd still be on Windows Mobile 6.5 if it weren't for him. I disagree. It's insensitive for me to say this so soon after his death; but the internet is a place for honesty, not inhibition.
Though my argument is poorly organized, it's the best I have time for on my phone. Basically, his significance is greatly blown out of proportion, he hoarded his massive wealth, and he repeatedly claimed as his own or was given credit for the innovation of others.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk