Right. LG and Google chose an LTE/HSPA/UMTS/EDGE/GPRS/GSM chipset. Were you pointing out the brand and product line?
I thought it had some parts for LTE but not everything required for it to work.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Android Central Forums
^^This.What if FCC didn't do the lte test only because Tmobile didn't have it at the time of testing . But as we know tmobile is the only us carrier to have n4 for sale. FCC probably agreed with google and tmobile to come back for further testings when tmobile be ready with lte network... Until that time lte radio had to be disabled by software.
You, I assume, weren't privy to all of those arguing over the viability of the Nexus 4 utilizing LTE?or I'm wrong and you're trolling...?
'MURICA!
Hacking the old radio? You realize I could have flashed to the non LTE .48 radio and back to either .27 or .33 LTE enabled radio in the time it took to write this? No, you probably did not It's just software. But if you were waiting an official LTE announcement from Google, you may as well sell that N4.
Also, the N4 is a unlocked phone designed to sell to the millions and millions around the world that don't give two hoots about LTE like we do in the USA. LTE is proprietary. Also, there's a mulitude of good articles explaining EXACTLY why Google decided to leave out "official" LTE support. The reasons are many, and they're solid.
The "prior poster" is me. I know what you implied by your post, my retort was based on your not understanding the point of my "not giving a damn" about other people's 2? on the subject of the Nexus 4's LTE antenna. I'll assume you're new to the subject, though.My comment was in response to the prior poster stating he was going to have an LTE-enabled phone, and didn't (and I quote) "give a damn" what anybody else said. Or, I'd venture to say, no matter what reality was like. I thought it was a little bit of an over-the-top, kind of immature comment, which is why I decided to post the Sisyphus and His Boulder image.
How about you switch it back on and start testing it and see if it does work here domestically? That way, you can be the hero of the people.
An alternative I'd go along with is that, as suggested above ? and not at all unlike how it is with, say, CPUs ? it is manufacturing cost-wise cheaper to include elements of hardware on a standard chassis and disable stuff not belonging to the primary feature set than to roll out a separate chassis for just one model of device.
Besides, what is Band 4's overall place in the world of LTE? I assume it is capable of being supported, but is that what T-Mo's entire network will be comprised of? What about AT&T? What about carriers in other countries?
What we need here is some kind of explanation from Google before we all just go off half-cocked about it. And, at the end of the day, it is your own unlocked hardware to do with as you please; there is no need for you to throw that in everyone's face.
How about you switch it back on and start testing it and see if it does work here domestically? That way, you can be the hero of the people.
Hello All, How is everyone's HSPA+ speeds with this device? I know I get "4G" in my area but not sure if I get the 21 or 42. It's not a big deal as long as I get one but just wanted to know what the experience is with this. I am in Delaware about 40mins outside of Philly.
Yiu cab use the Speed Test app to measure network speeds at any time.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Android Central Forums
An alternative I'd go along with is that, as suggested above ? and not at all unlike how it is with, say, CPUs ? it is manufacturing cost-wise cheaper to include elements of hardware on a standard chassis and disable stuff not belonging to the primary feature set than to roll out a separate chassis for just one model of device.
The cheapest option is to use a chipset that stops at HSPA+. There's an abundance of those from multiple vendors. Paying ~$40 extra for one that supports LTE and then disabling LTE doesn't make financial sense.