Despite the better camera, the "significantly better" CPU, while great in benchmarks, isn't showing much of a performance upgrade in real-world use over the Moto X.
Well, you could say that about any of the current phones. I do not notice any huge difference in iPhone 5s performance over the nexus 5, even though it performs better in benchmarks.
My only point was that dismissing the nexus 5 as not being comparable to the other top phones out now seems a little premature to me. There are major areas where the nexus 5 is clearly better, even if the opposite is also true.
The software features, in-hand feel, battery life, and speaker are all better on the Moto X.
...in your opinion. Which is fine...you're entitled to an opinion. But "in hand feel' is hardly an objective measure.
Not to mention you can customize it and pay $99 on-contract for it. Not everyone feels like paying $350-400 for a phone
You do know you are not paying $99 for that phone, right? You are just paying it via subsidy. The MotoX does not retail for $99. On Verizon it is $500 retail -
Moto X - virtually all phones can be subsidized.
You can buy Nexus devices on contract as well...I bought my Nexus 4 on T-Mobile for $420 paying only $50 down. The Nexus 5 will be the same.
As far as the screen goes, we can throw specs at the board all day
Which you did. I was just doing the same thing you were doing. Spec-wise, the nexus 5 is right up there with the best of the current phones.
I'd choose the Nexus 5 over the iPhone 5S based on OS alone, but there's no denying that the A7 is a monster
I agree. The fact that the Nexus 5 is closer to it than almost any other Android phone (certainly far closer than the moto X) is a big deal. Because normally Apple has a huge advantage in this area.
As far as the screen goes, who cares about PPI once it gets past 300?
The people who said the retina display is so great care.
I personally can see the difference quite easily. There is no pixelation at all on 1080p devices, no matter how close you look. For me that is very nice. 300ppi to me is adequet...but 400+ is great. But thats just me.
You can't tell the difference.
LOL, I most certainly can. Even from several feet away.
The iPhone is brighter and has better color representation, but personally I'd take the bigger screen in this case because 4" is too small.
I am unconvinced the iPhone is brighter. But next time I am in a T-Mobile store I will do a comparison.
The HTC One is still a better low-light camera
By what measure? Reviewers have said that the Nexus 5's low light shots have less noise and are sharper. The One simply gathers more light.
the CPU means jack squat as it's still extremely fast in real-world situations.
If that is true why did you go on about the A7? Why does that matter if the (much slower) Moto X processor is perfectly fine? Why bring up the A7 and it's 64-bit at all?
I know I'm raining on your "I got the Nexus 5 and I want it to be the best" parade
Actually you're not, and I have explained why in detail. This seems to be annoying you for some reason. Your claim was not correct based on your own criteria, and i simply pointed that out.