Mike Dee
Ambassador
They can't keep both wide and telephoto?
The standard is not telephoto. You need three lenses to do it optically without a zoom
Last edited:
They can't keep both wide and telephoto?
Not disputing anything you're saying at all but it's kind of funny that when LG was one of the first ones with a twin rear camera a lot of users of other brands knocked LG. Now we are seeing more than two cameras. Despite how good Pixel has done with digital zooming I would like to see two cameras. I actually would prefer they improve the digital zoom and add a wide lens. I find wide more useful than a telephoto on a phone. It's the thing I miss most about my V20.
Well I knocked LG for being LG. When I had LG phones I didn't mind them and I loved the camera but their processing on the camera + the stability of their devices was definitely not in their favor.
The standard is not telephoto. You need three lenses to do it optically with a zoom
That should have said without a zoom
When we see the prices of the new Samsung line, I have a feeling that after tomorrow the Pixel will look like the best bargain on Android.
Eh...I don't think so. One Plus is still the best bargain for what you get per price imo.
Not if you value monthly security updates and three years of OS support. Personally I'm not a big fan of cheap Chinese spec slabs stuffed with RAM, chunky UI, and bloatware - they're a dime a dozen these days.Eh...I don't think so. One Plus is still the best bargain for what you get per price imo.
Not if you value monthly security updates and three years of OS support. Personally I'm not a big fan of cheap Chinese spec slabs stuffed with RAM, chunky UI, and bloatware - they're a dime a dozen these days.
Pixel 3 and 3 XL are discounted by $200 dollars now. Assuming this is in light of the S10 announcement.
I reiterate my hopes that competition from Samsung will force Google to step it up with the Pixel 4 models. The Pixel 3 models corrected many of the things the Pixel 2 models got wrong. Great. Now Google needs to elevate the Pixel brand.
I think Google pixel 4 is going be great phone this year... I'm ready for it
I'm ready, too.
Besides hardware improvements, I sincerely hope Google fixes the gestures, too. There's no two ways about it: Android gestures are broken -- a half-baked, gobbled-together mess. We've all gotten used to them because we have no choice, but Google can do better here. It's worrisome that the Android Q previews show Google may still not get rid of the nav bar space for more usable screen. Just makes no sense...
I'm ready, too.
Besides hardware improvements, I sincerely hope Google fixes the gestures, too. There's no two ways about it: Android gestures are broken -- a half-baked, gobbled-together mess. We've all gotten used to them because we have no choice, but Google can do better here. It's worrisome that the Android Q previews show Google may still not get rid of the nav bar space for more usable screen. Just makes no sense...
I actually feel like their progression with the system is moving ok. People will always have different opinions about what they should do because ... people. I mean, you still have advocates for the 3 button system hanging around til the end of time.
I feel like Google's in a tougher spot since they develop the base OS for their OEM partners to skin. That's just so many different devices. Hard to find a space so all can function well.
From rumors Android Q is supposed to bring full gestures for pixels , the space bar is their pixel launcher trademark
For sure, you can't please everyone, but even objectively speaking, the current gestures don't make much sense. They're not even truly all gestures yet, as there's still a mix of button presses and long presses.
The quick-slide function is perhaps the best example of how broken the gestures are. You have to slide-right, then sort of slide back left a bit, and then you can start sliding right again to quickly flip through your opened apps. It's awkward to initiate and worse, unreliable to actually use. It scrolls way too fast. I would argue the app drawer is also broken and convoluted.
We're all used to it because we have no choice, but being used to it is very different than actually having good sensible gestures. I dislike iOS, but Apple got gestures right. They still don't have a consistent 'back' experience but they have virtually everything else correct. OnePlus and Motorola and a few others have figured out gestures far better than Google, too.
I think Google can do better.
I definitely agree that they can do better and I feel like the current system is just transitional. I implement the switcher differently, I don't use the pill just swipe with my thumb, so how you describe the pill seems like a frustration point for sure.
I feel like Google is wanting to reduce user need to even go to the app drawer very often. I think this will be a tough user habit for them to change. People who have been on Android for a long time love to go the app drawer a lot, though I believe it to be more of a fidget habit than necessity, so trying to ween them off of doing that as much as they do, will be hard.
Regardless I, like you, am looking forward to the Pixel 4. I think it's going to be a great device! We'll see what happens with Q this spring. The public Beta should open in May, though developers will get their first look next month.Will be interesting to see what they've got cooking.
Unless I am misunderstanding what we've seen in Android Q's gestures, is it full gestures if you still need to tap to go home or long press to activate Assistant? Granted, I don't think Google has any choice since they want so many things outta the pill, but then I wouldn't call it full gestures.
I'm also not sure I follow that the nav-bar space is the Pixel launcher trademark. You mean the little pill? I sincerely believe Google can still keep the pill there while giving us more screen space. An entire bar at the bottom of the phone for just a pill feels like wasted space to me.