Yeah maybe they won't maybe they will. Unless your name is dan hesse you don't really know do you?
Secondly even if they don't they will most definitely use some type of data throttling. Don't know about you but I've only been with sprint since 2000 so I think I might have a little insight into how sprint does business. Just saying.
Very true...I'm not Dan Hesse. However, I've been with Sprint since 1998 if we're trying to measure anything.
If Sprint isn't throttling data now, and are trying to add towers and increase coverage from what they call "Core Areas" and work it outward, instead of piecing it together like they did before, I don't see them throttling data. Perhaps you should get the minutes of some of their board meetings like we do at HP. Because Sprint is publicly traded, they are required by law to record the minutes and make them available to the public. That's one way to determine if you want to stay with a carrier, or buy some stock.
If people hate Sprint, I wish them the best as they go to Verizon or elsewhere. Verizon's 3G is the slowest by the good old JD Power testing everyone likes to quote. AT&T is the fastest if you have coverage, T-Mob has the least coverage, so if those 2 merge, it will be interesting. That will leave VZW, Sprint, ATT-Mob, and some small regional ones. I have 4G coverage here, but I use WiFi and 3G for the most part. If Sprint is able to cover 90% of an area, they are doing well. Verizon is supposed to have LTE in my area in 2014. I like Sprint. If anybody else doesn't, welcome to America...You're free to use whoever you want.