Originally Posted by
nickthorley I was wondering why they dont keep the same spec for the mini as they do in the larger htc one as in memory and cpu. I dont particularly want a large android phone (the iphone 4s size would be sufficient). However I dont want a phone thats slow or under powered and hence I want the cpu and memory of the one in the mini. Is this not required as the processor is mainly sized to drive the heavy graphics load that the larger screen inflicts and hence is not needed for the mini or is it purely because of the physical size of the case and hence smaller slower components have to go in there. Also is the smaller battery in the mini equivalent to the runtime of the larger battery in the one - ie smaller screen and processor dont need as big battery and hence the one mini can be made smaller?
You'd have to ask HTC that. But I think it's because they're aiming for lower cost as well as smaller. And I wouldn't consider the Mini to be underpowered, really. The Snap 400 is a decent CPU, and most of the time it's just as fast as the HTC One.
Originally Posted by
vikram shah How does the sound quality compare to the HTC One?
From the front speakers, it's *really* close. The One seems bassier (which makes sense -- larger phone = larger speakers = larger chambers), while the Mini is a little more trebbly -- though not necessarily tinny.
Originally Posted by
vikram shah How does it feel in the hand compare to the HTC One? Easier to handle? too small?
It's easier to hold mainly due to the fact that it's narrower. The plastic trim around the edge is also easier on your hand, whereas the fullsize One has fairly sharp edges.