Why hasn't DxO rated the G6 camera?

[jamezr]

Just as the title says.... I wonder why hasn't DxO rated the G6 camera?
The OPO5 rating came in at 87 today.

 

[Aquila]

I think LG has to send them a unit

 

[LeoRex]

Yeah, there's something going on between LG and Dxo... They've only tested two phones, G2 and G4. Then nothing. So two full release cycles.

 

[eneuro]

The G6 got 84

 

[Bruno Slivar]

Where you find that (84)?

 

[eneuro]

Yesterday, when they announced the OP5 score, the G6 was there as well for like 4-5 hours, then they removed it for some reason.

 

[j_grouchy]

Yeah, there's something going on between LG and Dxo... They've only tested two phones, G2 and G4. Then nothing. So two full release cycles.

G5 is on there with an 86.


https://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/LG-G5-Mobile-review-Outstanding-results-for-stills

 

[LeoRex]

G5 is on there with an 86.


https://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/LG-G5-Mobile-review-Outstanding-results-for-stills

You're right! Silly me, assuming that clicking on their "All LG Products" button would give me all the LG products they've reviewed.

 

[Aquila]

https://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/LG-G6-Mobile-review-Punchy-pictures

It's back now.

 

[LeoRex]

Yeah, I gotta agree with the rating. If there was one work I could use to describe it, it would be 'inconsistent'. Good news is that inconsistent can usually be addressed in the code... if the camera can get it right one time, that should be repeatable.

 

[eneuro]

Don't look too much into it , unfortunately LG didn't deliver the money dxo wanted in time .

 

[Jeremiah Bonds]

Yeah, I gotta agree with the rating. If there was one work I could use to describe it, it would be 'inconsistent'. Good news is that inconsistent can usually be addressed in the code... if the camera can get it right one time, that should be repeatable.

I wonder if it has to do with carrier version as well. I haven't seen a lot of TMobile users complain about the camera.

 

[Aquila]

Don't look too much into it , unfortunately LG didn't deliver the money dxo wanted in time .

Thumbs down to this comment. Slanderous accusations of corruption should be made with supporting evidence.

 

[LeoRex]

I wonder if it has to do with carrier version as well. I haven't seen a lot of TMobile users complain about the camera.

I'm on T-Mobile as well... I am just super picky. And so is my wife... so when she's annoyed, that falls on me.

 

[eneuro]

Thumbs down to this comment. Slanderous accusations of corruption should be made with supporting evidence.

Search the web mate. Giving 87 score for video stabilization on one plus 5 video that is like you are experiencing an earthquake and giving G6 84 should tell you enough. Also G6 came out 3-4 months ago but they post the review one day after giving its main competition at that price range a higher score? Not fishy at all.

 

[Almeuit]

I wonder if it has to do with carrier version as well. I haven't seen a lot of TMobile users complain about the camera.

He is on T-Mobile so same software.

 

[Aquila]

Search the web mate. Giving 87 score for video stabilization on one plus 5 video that is like you are experiencing an earthquake and giving G6 84 should tell you enough. Also G6 came out 3-4 months ago but they post the review one day after giving its main competition at that price range a higher score? Not fishy at all.

Please prove that either LG or OnePlus 5 (or both) paid DXO for their score to be adjusted from the actual measurements. Because that's what you are alleging. Everyone who knows anything about the ratings, knows that it is a purely mathematical scaling of composite measurement results. In other words, there are no opinions in the numbers. There are opinions and analysis in the text review, but the text review does not change the actual score. So if you are going to allege corruption, you should back that up with facts, not speculation based on your own biases and external coincidence.

 

[eneuro]

If you can't do be arsed to do a small web research where it has been proven numerous times. It's not a based speculation its the truth proven in reviews and also if you ever held both phones and used them. Not that hard to do a small search.

 

[Aquila]

If you can't do be arsed to do a small web research where it has been proven numerous times. It's not a based speculation its the truth proven in reviews and also if you ever held both phones and used them. Not that hard to do a small search.

What would you recommend searching for? https://www.google.com/search?q=dxomark+corruption 0 results.

Can you point to one credible source that substantiates your claim that either LG or OnePlus 5 (or both) paid DXO for their score to be adjusted from the actual measurements?

You're not even alleging the normal tune of "bias" that's easily disprovable; you're literally alleging corruption. Your accusation is not only untrue, it's absolutely ludicrous.

 

[eneuro]

Lmao, do you use reddit, Facebook, basic social media? Guess not. And also clearly your sense of humor is out of order, LG paying dxo was sarcasm.