But if the battery capacity will really be 45000mAh come on. That's plenty and fair for the taking away of removable battery. If they did this with waterproofing I would gladly accept that trade off.I don't trust this article but I stopped reading here. I already know this is the LG is taking but I'm still disappointed. //uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170727/27f4a49bdfbaa1912a8ce4975a756959.jpg
They could still do waterproofing with a removable battery. And I'd rather have two or three interchangeable 3500mAh batteries than one 4500. Yes that is a nice capacity but I'd rather swap than charge.But if the battery capacity will really be 45000mAh come on. That's plenty and fair for the taking away of removable battery. If they did this with waterproofing I would gladly accept that trade off.
Are there any phones that are waterproof and have a removable battery?They could still do waterproofing with a removable battery. And I'd rather have two or three interchangeable 3500mAh batteries than one 4500. Yes that is a nice capacity but I'd rather swap than charge.
And so is every other phone available todayThe Galaxy S5 was only water resistant I thought.
All the phones are water resistant... None of them are waterproofThe Galaxy S5 was only water resistant I thought.
Do we really need 24mp ?
I just read the site and it sounds so bogus to me. I don't see this happening at all.
Right!? Id rather have a BETTER 12MP sensor than just bloated numbers.We don't need a lot of things. 24 megapixel is overkill on a small sensor but I'll take it.
Right!? Id rather have a BETTER 12MP sensor than just bloated numbers.
Not always. It depends on the software as well. The 12mp Google Pixel for instance can produce sharper images than a competing pump phone. I think Nokia did it best as far as their tech and their 20mp sensors.True that it's not always about megapixels but they still matter. If you zoom in, you lose a lot of detail because of the smaller megapixel count. For example, taking a picture of a street sign from a distance, it'll be more readable on a 16MP camera than 12MP.
We don't need a lot of things. 24 megapixel is overkill on a small sensor but I'll take it.
I know all the arguments, trust me, using zoom on smartphones..not worth its weight in gold. Just Google the Megapixel Myth. http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/20849_The_Megapixel_myth_2015_Editio.phpTrue that it's not always about megapixels but they still matter. If you zoom in, you lose a lot of detail because of the smaller megapixel count. For example, taking a picture of a street sign from a distance, it'll be more readable on a 16MP camera than 12MP.