Recent content by nof8butwhatwemake

Sounds like debris under the screen. Is it possible to provide a picture?

This does not prevent Samsung capturing your data through your contact's usage of it, as I outlined in my example.

A ton of concerning stuff in there IMO. "Contacts and Communications Data. The Customization Service may access your contact list and may collect and analyze your incoming/outgoing call and text message history to provide you with services, such as to determine your relationships with others...

Same for me. I strictly swipe though, I never hunt-n-peck, so that may be why Samsung keyboard doesn't work as well for me.

Correct. To ask.

I'm not against software that's for assisting humans in their tasks when you have humans working directly with the results of those algorithms and still holding the final say on any action before it's taken. However there are several defense companies currently working on projects that will...

Well, then I guess it's a good thing malicious acts by large intelligence organizations are always done in front of civilians.. that way you'll know when to be concerned. Sorry, I just had to.. lol. Have a great rest of your weekend, enjoyed the debate.

"A DoD statement from July announced that Project Maven aimed to "deploy computer algorithms to war zone by year's end", talking up an "AI arms race" and the fact that former Alphabet chairman Eric Schmidt now refers to Google as an AI company, not a data company." I'll just leave this here...

What you see as a beneficial reduction in human error I see as the alleviation of a necessary responsibility for accuracy. Once algorithms take over tasks such as determining hostile targets, who's responsible when mistakes are made? Who's shouldering the moral weight of those deaths? Once...

I respect your right to voice your opinion, however reason dictates the legitimacy of the concerns expressed by the employees directly involved with the project itself outweighs the significance of opinion from an outsider with no actual knowledge of the program. These Google employees were...

Easy way to avoid the debate IMO, but I'll respect the response.

Yet it took the equivalent of an employee rebellion to bring this to light. Google was moving forward and still may be - so if they're willing to apply their technology to military applications that will directly result in the killing of human beings, exactly what line so you think Google will...

To be specific, the development and implementation of AI in numerous applications which is not only an admitted agenda but has become a controversial one already. The reality is in order to build an effective AI, a massive amount of human data must be collected. Algorithms that have a deep...

Would you not agree to that in order for significant advancements to be made in the technologies Google has expressed interest in pursuing, extensive privacy sacrifices would have to be made to facilitate the collection of the data required to make these advances? If we can agree that to be the...

Certainly. Please let me clarify as well that I'm in no way insinuating anyone with an opinion different from mine is ignorant. I'm only offering my perspective as it pertains to Google's data collection and the inherent risks associated with it. I appreciate the debate, it allows me to evolve...