08-01-2013 01:41 PM
535 ... 19202122
tools
  1. NoYankees44's Avatar
    Here's the shot I've been looking for (the profile). It looks fairly thick for a 2013 phone with 2012 specs doesn't? I think my GNex is thinner than this. Though I guess it's tough to compare...

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BPo6VwHCMAAjD6G.png:large

    Source: https://twitter.com/evleaks
    I will wait to judge when I can hold it and see how it actually feels, but your right. It seems that they might be making several mistakes with this one...

    Sent from my SCH-I535
    07-20-2013 04:46 PM
  2. ultravisitor's Avatar
    First of all, we don't know if that's the actual size of the device. Second, remember that the edges are curved. The middle will be thicker.
    07-20-2013 04:50 PM
  3. clarker07's Avatar
    It seems that they might be making several mistakes with this one...
    I should just stop reading the forums for phones that aren't out yet.
    07-20-2013 04:53 PM
  4. RobUM2011's Avatar
    First of all, we don't know if that's the actual size of the device. Second, remember that the edges are curved. The middle will be thicker.
    Yea that's true. I'll reserve judgment until I can see it in person.
    07-20-2013 05:11 PM
  5. Clocks's Avatar
    Also the right price could make some of this mean a lot less.
    07-20-2013 06:39 PM
  6. equake's Avatar
    Well the price point makes little difference since there are already midrange phones which come in the price with same or better specs.



    Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
    07-21-2013 01:18 AM
  7. ekimpadd's Avatar
    Well the price point makes little difference since there are already midrange phones which come in the price with same or better specs.



    Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
    It isnt all about specs, thats the point Google and Motorola will make with the Moto X

    Posted via Android Central App
    07-21-2013 04:46 AM
  8. RobUM2011's Avatar
    It's actually very sexy in white.



    Source: https://twitter.com/evleaks
    07-21-2013 07:58 AM
  9. JHBThree's Avatar
    Well the price point makes little difference since there are already midrange phones which come in the price with same or better specs.



    Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
    Not really.

    Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 2
    07-21-2013 12:34 PM
  10. srkmagnus's Avatar
    It isnt all about specs, thats the point Google and Motorola will make with the Moto X

    Posted via Android Central App
    That's what all the hype is about. I'm interested in this device and what Google has planned for it and the future kine of Moto devices.

    Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk 2
    07-21-2013 01:08 PM
  11. NoYankees44's Avatar
    O and one more to my list of questions :

    Are they going to use that same amoled garbage on the screen or put some of that amazing lcd3 tech that htc is using?

    This is a place that moto could really shine. You don't have to have 1080p the have an amazing screen, but they are going to have to have something better than the oversaturated amoled to do it. Lcd3 seems to be more efficient as well.

    Sent from my SCH-I535
    07-21-2013 06:42 PM
  12. bunique4life05's Avatar
    O and one more to my list of questions :

    Are they going to use that same amoled garbage on the screen or put some of that amazing lcd3 tech that htc is using?

    This is a place that moto could really shine. You don't have to have 1080p the have an amazing screen, but they are going to have to have something better than the oversaturated amoled to do it. Lcd3 seems to be more efficient as well.

    Sent from my SCH-I535
    I see your point between LCD and Amoled when it comes down to efficiency. I would prefer LCD over amoled for efficient. Hopefully they do run LCD screen but it doesn't have to be LCD 3.

    Sent from my SGH-T999 using AC Forums mobile app
    07-21-2013 07:08 PM
  13. bunique4life05's Avatar
    LCD 2 and LCD 3 both at 720p what are the differences be?

    Sent from my SGH-T999 using AC Forums mobile app
    07-21-2013 07:09 PM
  14. NoYankees44's Avatar
    LCD 2 and LCD 3 both at 720p what differences be?

    Sent from my SGH-T999 using AC Forums mobile app
    I don't know the technology differences, but when I hold my rezound next to a dna or a one the difference is amazing. Lcd2 was kind of bland. Very natural color, but a little less vibrant than it needed to be. Lcd3 is just as vibrant as amoled, but not over saturated and brighter.

    Sent from my SCH-I535
    07-21-2013 07:32 PM
  15. srkmagnus's Avatar
    Some new information on the Moto X: http://m.androidcentral.com/moto-x-a...specs-revealed

    Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
    07-21-2013 11:23 PM
  16. hodan's Avatar
    4.3 in. display, 720p (342ppi), 16gb storage, 1gb ram, 5mp camera (1.2mp front), 1080p recording, dual core 1.4ghz Krait, 305 Adreno, 2000 mah battery.

    Look familiar? That's the HTC First. And it's $ .99 on AT&T. Ninety-nine CENTS.

    I don't care if the Moto X battery lasts ONE MONTH between charges with 12 hours of on-screen time/day.

    Google better hope these "new" features break everything we know about the universe.
    07-21-2013 11:37 PM
  17. SpiralBorg's Avatar
    4.3 in. display, 720p (342ppi), 16gb storage, 1gb ram, 5mp camera (1.2mp front), 1080p recording, dual core 1.4ghz Krait, 305 Adreno, 2000 mah battery.

    Look familiar? That's the HTC First. And it's $ .99 on AT&T. Ninety-nine CENTS.

    I don't care if the Moto X battery lasts ONE MONTH between charges with 12 hours of on-screen time/day.

    Google better hope these "new" features break everything we know about the universe.
    Motorola X specs:

    4.7 in. display, 2 GB RAM, 10.5MP camera, Dual Core 1.7Ghz MSM8960DT CPU, Adreno 320 GPU and 2,200mah battery

    Sent from my MZ604
    Rizz1-2 likes this.
    07-21-2013 11:43 PM
  18. Clocks's Avatar
    The latest spec roundup on phone arena makes me believe it beats out the gs3. Not top specs but respectable.

    Price, the promise of near stock android with fast updates and a few new features would make it more appealing to me than the gs4 or one.
    07-21-2013 11:49 PM
  19. bunique4life05's Avatar
    4.3 in. display, 720p (342ppi), 16gb storage, 1gb ram, 5mp camera (1.2mp front), 1080p recording, dual core 1.4ghz Krait, 305 Adreno, 2000 mah battery.

    Look familiar? That's the HTC First. And it's $ .99 on AT&T. Ninety-nine CENTS.

    I don't care if the Moto X battery lasts ONE MONTH between charges with 12 hours of on-screen time/day.

    Google better hope these "new" features break everything we know about the universe.
    The masses don't understand or pay attention about specs. It us always about features.

    Sent from my SGH-T999 using AC Forums mobile app
    07-22-2013 12:04 AM
  20. return_0's Avatar
    4.3 in. display, 720p (342ppi), 16gb storage, 1gb ram, 5mp camera (1.2mp front), 1080p recording, dual core 1.4ghz Krait, 305 Adreno, 2000 mah battery.

    Look familiar? That's the HTC First. And it's $ .99 on AT&T. Ninety-nine CENTS.

    I don't care if the Moto X battery lasts ONE MONTH between charges with 12 hours of on-screen time/day.

    Google better hope these "new" features break everything we know about the universe.
    Let's see... smaller screen, less RAM, worse camera, worse CPU and GPU, smaller battery, older Android version... your point?

    Sent from my pure Google Nexus 4 using Android Central Forums
    TheLibertarian and Rizz1-2 like this.
    07-22-2013 12:14 AM
  21. JHBThree's Avatar
    4.3 in. display, 720p (342ppi), 16gb storage, 1gb ram, 5mp camera (1.2mp front), 1080p recording, dual core 1.4ghz Krait, 305 Adreno, 2000 mah battery.

    Look familiar? That's the HTC First. And it's $ .99 on AT&T. Ninety-nine CENTS.

    I don't care if the Moto X battery lasts ONE MONTH between charges with 12 hours of on-screen time/day.

    Google better hope these "new" features break everything we know about the universe.
    What are you trying to prove? Because you just proved that the Moto X has better specs.
    return_0, osubeavs728 and Rizz1-2 like this.
    07-22-2013 12:15 AM
  22. karn101's Avatar
    I don't think he's saying it's better. I think it's more like, the price better be on point because something pretty similar in specs is being sold for 1 dollar. That's how I read it, and I somewhat agree. I am extremely curious to see the Verizon off-contract price.
    07-22-2013 03:44 AM
  23. bquindawl's Avatar
    I don't think he's saying it's better. I think it's more like, the price better be on point because something pretty similar in specs is being sold for 1 dollar. That's how I read it, and I somewhat agree. I am extremely curious to see the Verizon off-contract price.
    I am.very curious of this too. This will end up being a pretty good test of exactly how much they can get away with, I have a feeling.

    Posted via Android Central App
    07-22-2013 04:53 AM
  24. bunique4life05's Avatar
    http://androidcommunity.com/moto-x-p...us-4-20130722/

    "Latest tips suggest Google and Motorola will undercut the Nexus 4 with both the price, and with what they offer. That being a 16GB Moto X smartphone (off contract) for the same price as the 8GB Nexus 4. According to reports weve received ourselves here at Android Community, and from GizmoFusion, Google and Motorola will be making a huge push with this budget friendly device. Thanks for the photo @evleaks.
    The tipster claims the 16GB Moto X will cost users just $299, off contract, and will also be sold by carriers. Then the 32GB Moto X will be $349, which is a pretty impressive price with all things considered. However, it isnt yet known what carriers will be asking, but were hearing that will be $99 and $149, respectively."

    $349 for 32GB please have awesome battery life and fast os updates.

    Sent from my SGH-T999 using AC Forums mobile app
    07-22-2013 04:35 PM
  25. Gerg04's Avatar
    Moto X pricing tipped to undercut the Nexus 4 - Android Community

    "Latest tips suggest Google and Motorola will undercut the Nexus 4 with both the price, and with what they offer. That being a 16GB Moto X smartphone (off contract) for the same price as the 8GB Nexus 4. According to reports weve received ourselves here at Android Community, and from GizmoFusion, Google and Motorola will be making a huge push with this budget friendly device. Thanks for the photo @evleaks.
    The tipster claims the 16GB Moto X will cost users just $299, off contract, and will also be sold by carriers. Then the 32GB Moto X will be $349, which is a pretty impressive price with all things considered. However, it isnt yet known what carriers will be asking, but were hearing that will be $99 and $149, respectively."

    $349 for 32GB please have awesome battery life and fast os updates.

    Sent from my SGH-T999 using AC Forums mobile app
    Very interesting. I LOVE love love my G Note 2. But I am super intrigued and really considering selling the GN2 to pick this up at that price. Like you guys have been saying above, they better have some really nice features to outweigh the old hardware. I've said a million times: you couldn't pry my Note from my cold dead hands. But there's something about having stock Android on the cheap. Plus I'm a total technology wh*re. I just can't help myself.
    08-01-2013 12:22 AM
535 ... 19202122

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 05-26-2011, 01:45 PM
  2. Is the Motorola Droid a good phone?
    By Chrisy in forum Motorola Droid
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-24-2011, 04:08 PM
  3. Bart Simpson's quotes widget
    By Patriiick in forum Android Apps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-24-2010, 10:19 PM
  4. Did Droid Save Motorola's Phone Division?
    By johnatthebar in forum Motorola Droid
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-21-2009, 10:10 PM
  5. Motorola Droid the only Android phone with a flash?
    By xfuchsiax in forum Motorola Droid
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-06-2009, 03:03 PM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD