Tbh, if the rumored phone we have been hearing about comes specs and features that some have claimed it has, it would be a giant fail for google/Motorola. It's very underwhelming and can not compete with the big boys.
Think about it. Say it is a dual core 1.7ghz with 2gig of ram and a 720p display. Combine that with the rumored 4000mAh battery and you have a phone that will have great battery life. Adapt the OS to the hardware and it should be a very competitive mid range phone...
I don't think everyone wants a phone on contact. If they make this reasonably priced I could see it doing very well.
I love my one but I still look forward to seeing what this phone has to offer. May even get it as a backup
Sent from my HTC One
Think about it. Say it is a dual core 1.7ghz with 2gig of ram and a 720p display. Combine that with the rumored 4000mAh battery and you have a phone that will have great battery life. Adapt the OS to the hardware and it should be a very competitive mid range phone...
I don't think everyone wants a phone on contact. If they make this reasonably priced I could see it doing very well.
I love my one but I still look forward to seeing what this phone has to offer. May even get it as a backup
Sent from my HTC One
I've seen rumors for 2100, but no 4000 except on this page.
Transmitted through spacetime.
I agree with what you said but didn't motorola's CEO say that the Moto X wasn't gonna be one of the lower priced phone's at D11?
Removable or Non Removable? The battery specification have not been to clear.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using AC Forums mobile app
Tbh, if the rumored phone we have been hearing about comes specs and features that some have claimed it has, it would be a giant fail for google/Motorola. It's very underwhelming and can not compete with the big boys.
This latest leak, if true, means this phone just comes across as an average contender to me. Nothing impressed me as exceptional or innovative, but nothing struck me as being terrible either. I see this phone as a "nice/ok" phone for average folks. That's neither praise nor criticism, it's just my observation.
What I do criticize is based on where I live - Canada. As a former owner of a Moto smartphone, I can testify that the customer support forums for NON-USA owners is riddled with very poor customer service complaints. If you're outside of the US, Moto's treatment of you, to be blunt, sucks balls. What I'm seeing now is what I've seen in the past from Motorola outside of the USA: carrier exclusivity. That set off an alarm with me. I'm also very concerned that Google never did restructure Motorola's infrastructure after they acquired the company, which means same old faces, and likely a lot of poor practices and habits continuing in the guts of the employee pool from the pre-buyout days.
In fact, their support forums look exactly the same as they always have and their support staff are also the pre-buyout people. I don't think it's far fetched at all to assume that Google's management of Moto is likely pretty light and they've allowed them to conduct their affairs pretty much the same as they always have.
Having been burnt once, and seeing some activity now that worries me, I'm going to take the ultra safe wait and see approach and watch Motorola's 2013 phones from the sidelines to see if they've mended their ways since the Google takeover.
Not sure if you're aware of Canadian carriers Ry, but Bell is actually the largest of the big 3 carriers in Canada. You can see how any phone being exclusive to Rogers is more of a big deal to us than you make it out to be. Neither Samsung nor HTC seemed to have any problem at all getting their phones out to everyone up here. What's Moto's excuse?
So any leaks that say Bell isn't getting a variant of the Moto X?
Posted via Android Central App
The Rogers video clearly states the X is "coming exclusively to Rogers".