Pollster
Well-known member
I will admit being excited about this phone, but uncannily the same amount as during the run-up hype for the RAZR. I remember how that turned out, so this surprises me not at all
I'm more disappointed that we don't have release dates. And why are only certain carriers getting the motomaker first. It should be aval to everyone at the same time. Everything else about the phone leaked, so we were already aware of all the specs. I just want carrier release dates. That was my biggest disappointment.
What did you expect?
How much were those expectations tied to reality versus how much were they pipe dreams that you couldn't let go of?
Just curious because I'm not really disappointed by much other than the lack of a 32gb option and delaying of Moto Maker for Verizon.
Maybe a lot of it was wishcasting, but there was at least reasonable expectations of both. Both the Galaxy Nexus and the Nexus 4 were very modestly priced off-contract, and there was reason to think Google would continue pushing that pricing model through Motorola.
Hindsight is 20/20 and all, but I think you're downplaying the extent to which Motorola hyped something revolutionary and instead we're getting just another phone. A totally decent looking phone with some quality attributes, but just another phone at a price that's not competitive.
Edit: put slightly differently, why would I buy this over an 80-dollar on-contract HTC One or something?
Maybe a lot of it was wishcasting, but there was at least reasonable expectations of both. Both the Galaxy Nexus and the Nexus 4 were very modestly priced off-contract, and there was reason to think Google would continue pushing that pricing model through Motorola.
Edit: put slightly differently, why would I buy this over an 80-dollar on-contract HTC One or something?
What's lesser, you mean battery? I also prefer 4.7 screen size to 5
What you're forgetting is that for essentially the same price you can get the SAME EXACT PHONE, BUT BETTER, in the Droid Max or Droid Ultra. Hell they're both moto phones using the same tech with the same features EXCEPT they won't have wood. My fault, everyone want's that game-changing wood.
Moto could not have screwed the X up worse...
Everyone is happy that it's assembled in the US, but then complain about the price. This is the cost of having electronics assembled outside of Asia, Motorola need to factor in the much higher cost of wages.
Seriously, I love how some people expect to have it both ways:
1. Made in 'Murica, YEAH!!
2. I won't pay this much for a phone not made in SE Asia!!
Sent from my HTC One Sinless ver 2.7 Google Edition rom
What did you expect?
How much were those expectations tied to reality versus how much were they pipe dreams that you couldn't let go of?
Just curious because I'm not really disappointed by much other than the lack of a 32gb option and delaying of Moto Maker for Verizon.
The phone is exactly what I was expecting. Looks good. Wasn't expecting them to use marketing to make up the spec difference between the x and the gs4 and one.
At the end of the day youre paying a premium because this isn't bleeding edge hardware but its priced like it is.... where is that premium coming from?
Or maybe different people said those things and you combined them in your head.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Everyone is happy that it's assembled in the US, but then complain about the price. This is the cost of having electronics assembled outside of Asia, Motorola need to factor in the much higher cost of wages.
I am not complaining about the price, I am complaining about the specs...if I wanted a mid range phone I would have kept my razr...but after seeing what the X had inside...I went with the S4