Top Motorola engineer defends Moto X specs (Q&A) - CNET Mobile
Cool interview with lead engineer behind the moto x.
Posted via Android Central App
Cool interview with lead engineer behind the moto x.
Posted via Android Central App
This is the third or fourth time I've seen a thread made for this article, but no matter. It's still relevant (unfortunately) and hopefully it helps clear up some details as Moto Maker begins to launch on other carriers. It appears some folks are still uncomfortable purchasing an "under-spec'd" device heading into the holiday season.
I think the thing I enjoy the most is the overall tone of the interview. It's almost rant-like, as if he had spent a few days on the Android Central forums reading the ridiculous threads about how disappointing this phone was after it was announced.
I'm betting on you being awfully disappointed when that dream doesn't come to fruition.Im sure motorola will take a look at its sales numbers and bump up the specs for X2 to appear high end on paper and hopefully they can deliver new innovative features and same experience on X2 with higher specs!!
the trolls on the comment section from that article are humorous.
I'm betting on you being awfully disappointed when that dream doesn't come to fruition.
What's the point? The Moto X has optimized hardware that performs near or better than its hyper-spec'd competitors. User reviews cite it as being the best Android experience to date. All with "two cores" (by the way: the carriers advertise this phone as having an X8 Mobile Computing system, not a dual-core S4 Pro) and a 720p display. My guess is the Moto X2 (or whatever it's called) will have the S800 optimized in a similar hardware configuration to the current X8, but by that time it will be "last year's tech," as one former user so eloquently put it.
The Moto X is Motorola's attempt at taking Android in a different direction; in the past, Android phones have relied on imposing spec sheets to compete with Apple. The problem is that hasn't always translated into positive user experiences. The Moto X has turned that on its head, and been delightfully successful, regardless of what the sales numbers say. So if massively spec'd phones with billion core processors and enough RAMZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz to push-start an aircraft carrier are being beat out by a compact, modestly spec'd device with "last year's tech," I'll ask again...what's the point?
Either you're on board, or you're not. And, judging by Apple adopting the same principles with their iPhone 5S, if you're not on this train, you're gonna get left behind.
1080 is only going to drain battery and lower performance. The X got betters scores on gaming then HTC One and S4 Partially do to the 720p
Posted via Android Central App
Again...what's the point?Here's to hoping for a SD800 and a 1080p display on the X2
Posted via Android Central App
Also, the human eye cannot discern resolution beyond 300 pixels per inch. And we exceed that. So the eye can't even see the difference.
But the human eye can see big differences in color saturation and reproduction. In fact, I'd say that is even more important than resolution. So we decided to focus on that aspect instead.
Again...what's the point?
From that article...
Is 1080p really worth a downgrade in graphics performance and/or battery life? I'm with them when they say...
Yes, keep improving on AMOLED technology, and don't worry about resolution. There are more variables to creating a beautiful display than just resolution and pixel density. Now we're just bordering on diminishing returns.
Again...what's the point?
From that article...
Is 1080p really worth a downgrade in graphics performance and/or battery life? I'm with them when they say...
Yes, keep improving on AMOLED technology, and don't worry about resolution. There are more variables to creating a beautiful display than just resolution and pixel density. Now we're just bordering on diminishing returns.
So if massively spec'd phones with billion core processors and enough RAMZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz to push-start an aircraft carrier...