[unstoppablekem]

I'm a Windows Phone user, and I'm eyeing the One M8 for Windows, but if that doesn't come to AT&T as well, then I might switch to Android.

But with the X+1 spec leaks, it seems it will only be 16GB, or will offer a 32GB model as well, with no microSD. If there is no microSD, I need 64GB. I don't understand why they would downgrade storage, as the Moto X had a 64GB variant.

So my question is, will there be a 64GB model for this phone on AT&T, or will it have microSD? Thanks.

[Aquila]

What leak said that?

XTNiT-1060 through spacetime. Android Central Moderator.

[unstoppablekem]

Whenever I look up news on the Moto X+1, most of the articles say that.
Sent from my Nokia Lumia 920 using Tapatalk

[Clocks]

Because they are making crap up. Welcome to the world of tech blogs.

[Ry]

Whenever I look up news on the Moto X+1, most of the articles say that.
Sent from my Nokia Lumia 920 using Tapatalk

Link please.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

[Ry]

I'm a Windows Phone user, and I'm eyeing the One M8 for Windows, but if that doesn't come to AT&T as well, then I might switch to Android.

But with the X+1 spec leaks, it seems it will only be 16GB, or will offer a 32GB model as well, with no microSD. If there is no microSD, I need 64GB. I don't understand why they would downgrade storage, as the Moto X had a 64GB variant.

So my question is, will there be a 64GB model for this phone on AT&T, or will it have microSD? Thanks.

64GB was very late in the X's life.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

[unstoppablekem]

Link please.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

http://m.softpedia.com/motorola-moto...ay-455171.html

[unstoppablekem]

64GB was very late in the X's life.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

Maybe they won't do that this time?

[delrey1900]

I think it's because of the benchmark results are showing a 16gb. I'm sure there will be a 32gb and 64gb. The 64gb may be later like what was stated above.

Posted via Android Central App

[Ry]

http://m.softpedia.com/motorola-moto...ay-455171.html

Benchmarks aren't going to show the other storage options.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

[unstoppablekem]

Benchmarks aren't going to show the other storage options.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

Well we can just hope they have a 64GB model and/or microSD support.

[NoYankees44]

Let's just put it like this, if it is 16gb only with no sd, that is a no go for me. I will buy something else. If it has 16gb and an SD, I will probably buy, but I will not buy right at launch.

32gb should really be the minimum. Sd or not. Anything less is pathetic. Apps and media will only get bigger as time goes on. Especially with higher resolution and 64bit happening.

[Aquila]

Listen to my facial expression. I'd be shocked if 32 wasn't an option via Moto Maker on day 1.

[unstoppablekem]

Listen to my facial expression. I'd be shocked if 32 wasn't an option via Moto Maker on day 1.

They shouldn't do 16GB no microSD anymore. Either 16GB (or more) with microSD, or 32GB base model and 64GB option with no microSD


Sent from my PlayStation 4 using Tapatalk

[Ry]

They shouldn't do 16GB no microSD anymore. Either 16GB (or more) with microSD, or 32GB base model and 64GB option with no microSD


Sent from my PlayStation 4 using Tapatalk

They should do whatever their market research tells them to. If there's evidence that people still buy 16GB/no microSD, Motorola should make it.

You don't gave to buy it.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

[unstoppablekem]

They should do whatever their market research tells them to. If there's evidence that people still buy 16GB/no microSD, Motorola should make it.

You don't gave to buy it.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

Esh, no need to be so rude. I like the Moto X, I just want more storage. What's wrong with that?

[garyart1]

They should do whatever their market research tells them to. If there's evidence that people still buy 16GB/no microSD, Motorola should make it.

You don't gave to buy it.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

I am okay with that as long as they do what the customers want and not cater to the carriers. Let's face it, the more greedy carriers (read Verizon) want phones with less storage to force people to use the cloud. Which is fine on wifi but when wifi is not available, they hope you use data. Lots of data. The more data you use, the more money in their pockets. I was thinking once of getting the 64 gb Moto x but guess what. Can't with Verizon. Manufacturers were moving away from sd drives but many have moved back. All I know is that it is a lot cheaper to buy a larger capacity sd card than to but a phone with more memory. Sd drives are great for media (movies, music) that you would not want taking up your precious phone memory. Leave the phone memory for programs. I personally would love a moto x+1 in 32gb with a sd card.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk

[Aquila]

Esh, no need to be so rude. I like the Moto X, I just want more storage. What's wrong with that?

I'm sorry, Ry doesn't translate well to humans. It's definitely nothing against you. On one hand, you're right, it'd be awesome to see choices expand as well as capabilities. On the other hand, Moto got most of it's praise on the Moto X, G, etc based on very smart decisions they made that were the result of fairly extensive market research - I believe Ry is indicating that they did well capitalizing on that research once and should continue to look for the optimal results, rather than listening to what nerds like me want them to do

[Ry]

I'm sorry, Ry doesn't translate well to humans. It's definitely nothing against you. On one hand, you're right, it'd be awesome to see choices expand as well as capabilities. On the other hand, Moto got most of it's praise on the Moto X, G, etc based on very smart decisions they made that were the result of fairly extensive market research - I believe Ry is indicating that they did well capitalizing on that research once and should continue to look for the optimal results, rather than listening to what nerds like me want them to do

Precisely.

Most OEMs don't make phones specifically for us. The net is cast much wider.

But what I love about Android is that there's something for everyone. You may not want an X+1 with 16GB and no expandable memory. There will be other phones that better suit your needs.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

[Ry]

I am okay with that as long as they do what the customers want and not cater to the carriers. Let's face it, the more greedy carriers (read Verizon) want phones with less storage to force people to use the cloud. Which is fine on wifi but when wifi is not available, they hope you use data. Lots of data. The more data you use, the more money in their pockets. I was thinking once of getting the 64 gb Moto x but guess what. Can't with Verizon. Manufacturers were moving away from sd drives but many have moved back. All I know is that it is a lot cheaper to buy a larger capacity sd card than to but a phone with more memory. Sd drives are great for media (movies, music) that you would not want taking up your precious phone memory. Leave the phone memory for programs. I personally would love a moto x+1 in 32gb with a sd card.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk

Of the recent flagships from HTC, LG, Motorola, and Samsung, IIRC only the LG G2, HTC One (M7), and Moto X didn't have expandable memory.

People like to say it's a carrier thing. I'm leaning more towards an Android support thing. KitKat seems to better handle expandable memory the way Android and Google want. Now we're seeing micro SD come back to the G3 and One M8.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

[unstoppablekem]

Precisely.

Most OEMs don't make phones specifically for us. The net is cast much wider.

But what I love about Android is that there's something for everyone. You may not want an X+1 with 16GB and no expandable memory. There will be other phones that better suit your needs.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

Just is it that hard to say goodbye to 16GB on a phone? The first iPhone had 16GB (highest $ then, lowest now). Is it really that much more $ for the manufacturer to make 32GB the base model? Because I heard it is like nothing.

[Ry]

Just is it that hard to say goodbye to 16GB on a phone? The first iPhone had 16GB (highest $ then, lowest now). Is it really that much more $ for the manufacturer to make 32GB the base model? Because I heard it is like nothing.

First iPhone had 4GB as the base model.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

[unstoppablekem]

First iPhone had 4GB as the base model.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)

Like I said, the 16GB was the highest $ model. Although, it did exist. Why can't we just all agree that 32GB should be the min storage in a phone without microSD? Geez...

[delrey1900]

I'm just confused on why someone is worried about a 16gb being offered in the first place.

[davidnc]

Having had the Moto X 16 GB model since last Sept.
If the Moto X+1 just came out in a 16 GB model it would not be a deal breaker for me.
I will also say my some of my previous phones had 32 GB internal and a card as well .
Do I think the Moto X +1 will just be available in just 16 GB ? No