Apparently 30%? I have used it quite a bit, there were a couple small charges in there, but integrating that curve has a fair bit more area than even my Maxx did when new.
How much of that time was the screen on tho?
They would, had they been full charges. Hence the explanation of integrating the curve.I'm no expert, but if "there were a couple small charges in there", doesn't that negate any type of results? Don't get me wrong. I'm pleased that you're loving your Turbo. Most of us are as well.
They would, had they been full charges. Hence the explanation of integrating the curve.
I have had a RAZR Maxx, a Droid Maxx and now a Turbo. The Turbo is the best battery life I have experienced to date. If Verizon doesn't give us over the air enemas, it will be a fine phone indeed.
Coming from the Droid Razr Maxx with the 3300mAh battery to the Turbo with its 3900mAh battery was a bit less impressive experience for me. I really think the amount of battery required for the Turbo screens eats up that extra 600mAh and makes it a wash. In some cases, I feel I got better battery life from my Razr Maxx.
They would, had they been full charges. Hence the explanation of integrating the curve.
I have had a RAZR Maxx, a Droid Maxx and now a Turbo. The Turbo is the best battery life I have experienced to date. If Verizon doesn't give us over the air enemas, it will be a fine phone indeed.
I didn't realize that LP will improve battery life.
Does it matter? If he's doing everything he wants to do and getting 2 days of battery life, who cares how much is screen on time.
It's pretty impressive and a great phone!
Posted from my Droid Turbo, Kelly and Ozone
OK. So, the calculus reference isn't working here.The point was though that he's misrepresenting the battery life due to the 'few small charges' (which also isn't good for the phone's battery memory). Great that he is happy with it, but the posted picture is slightly misleading to others.
OK. So, the calculus reference isn't working here.
OK. So, the calculus reference isn't working here.
Because it fits. Its a highschool concept, thus I thought people would understand. Not like we're solving systems of differential equations on the imaginary plane...I'm guessing 85%+ of the general population wouldn't get a calculus reference. So, not sure why it would be used as an explanation as opposed to layman's terms.