For all 3, the aperture was 2.0 and ss1/40. The only difference was photo 1 ISO: 80, photo 2 ISO 125, and Photo 3 ISO 80.
Why waste so much time? Because I guess i like the phone and it's other attributes? Also because I'm hoping a fix eventually comes along for the camera? Is that allowed? Its an imaginary problem tho, right, even tho after all these months, two more current threads have popped up with people unhappy with the camera? You say you remember arguing with me about the camera X months ago.. OK...but has moto or Verizon released any suitable updates or addressed this issue yet? Again....I'm hoping. Because I do love the droid line of phones
Why waste so much time defending the camera to people who simply want a fix? What's your personal connection to moto/Verizon? You don't like the "complaining"? Skip the thread. People are allowed to be unhappy with what they purchase
And it wasn't really the mp that was misleading in the advert...it was the "never miss ANY of the action with this powerhouse camera at the flick of your wrist". The MAXX was what, 8, 10mp? And I got killer shots with it. I'm quite familiar with the fact that 80mp on a crap camera means nothing just like the super amazing deluxe display on the phone was overkill as well. Wasn't aware one needed to have a masters in photography to understand the complex interworkings of a cell phone camera and those who don't are idiots I guess
jamielov, pictures speak louder than words. And jerrykur is attacking the issue correctly (with knowledge).
Most of the rest of this is what my Grandmother would have called "gum flapping".
Ya'll enjoy, unsubscribe.
edit: one last useful piece of knowledge I'll contribute.
This is for an iphone 5, but it's indicative and you can find further info with Google, but
it shows why I dismiss cell phone camera quality overall so quickly. $18 for the camera.
Breaking down the $650 price of the iPhone | Digital Trends
The fact of the matter is, you are getting worse quality pictures than the vast majority of people here. Then, you get defensive when people say, "I'm not having that issue." Yet, you continue to B&M about an issue that isn't going to get corrected with B&M on an unofficial forum.
That said, if you take marketing speak as gospel, I feel bad for you AND any company you happen to buy a product from. Lord help you all.
Yes, pictures speak louder than words. And I've posted the pictures I've taken. Have a look
Thank you. Exactly! There is really NO reason to expect an upgraded specs phone from the same company would be worse than the prior model. And the MAXX was the easiest shooting phone/camera I've ever used with some truly amazing shots. Award winning....no....but the examples I've posted vs the Turbo speak for themselves. And the maxx was simply point and shoot. In this and the other thread I've heard some hilarious excuses about why my photos weren't good (lighting, exposure, shaking hand, someone's head in the way, temperature outside, rotation of the earth, etc) and it really shouldn't be this much work coupled with hoping and praying to get a good shot. I really think either the software is really messed up as a whole, or a simple exposure fix/patch can make this a good camera. But up to this point I havent seen one example of a difficult shot that came out good yet. Yes, I've seen your majestic mountain ranges, plastic android figurines, and parked cars photographed very nicely. But refer to my recent concert pics to get a "challenging" shot and its outcome.
Why waste so much time? Because I guess i like the phone and it's other attributes? Also because I'm hoping a fix eventually comes along for the camera? Is that allowed? Its an imaginary problem tho, right, even tho after all these months, two more current threads have popped up with people unhappy with the camera? You say you remember arguing with me about the camera X months ago.. OK...but has moto or Verizon released any suitable updates or addressed this issue yet? Again....I'm hoping. Because I do love the droid line of phones
Why waste so much time defending the camera to people who simply want a fix? What's your personal connection to moto/Verizon? You don't like the "complaining"? Skip the thread. People are allowed to be unhappy with what they purchase
By my count there is a half dozen people that have complained about it. Several more that take an attitude that "it's a cell phone camera, what do you expect".
It's not just the Moto Turbo camera that people are complaining about.
View attachment 161287
View attachment 161288
View attachment 161289
There's only about 6 people on this site that have expressed "total camera suckage". I would guess there are a couple people on the other Turbo forums as well. People don't go on forums and continually post about how great something is, they typically go there to get solutions to problems or complain.
You do realize he was defending you, right?
Thanks. That is more like I would expect. I wonder why mine acts differently?
FWIW, I just installed an Camera FV-5 and it offers a lot more control. Not quite what a want (full manual), but a step in the right direction.
Does it allow for adjustment of ISO and SS? I have A Better Camera, and unless I've missed it (and I've looked), I don't think I can adjust ISO manually (it's locked to the scenes).
Does it allow for adjustment of ISO and SS? I have A Better Camera, and unless I've missed it (and I've looked), I don't think I can adjust ISO manually (it's locked to the scenes).