Probably the third or fourth time you've described me as calling the Turbo camera "amazing". I've never said that. Please give the group links to those posts where I've said that, or else quit misrepresenting what I've said.
Neither have I said it's impossible to get a bad shot. In fact, I've said the shutter is slow and that objects in motion cause problems for the camera. Same request for links applies.
Then why start a thread explaining how you " tried so hard" to get a bad picture and just simply couldn't. I know it was such an effort for me to stage my faked blurry shots that took me all of 4 seconds to get. Again, its the snide snark out of the post that gets annoying. "Maybe its too much effort for some people", " go buy a new camera" etc. Again, asking for a camera that adequately takes useable pictures of moving objects... Consistently.... Isn't asking for a gold played dslr built in $4000 camera for $30. Its asking for a working part of a phone that has been a HUGE part of phones for how long now? 13 years? 11 years? They aren't called camera phones simply because its a cool name. Its a part of the phone people want. Good grief. Anytime anyone has anything to say even remotely negative about the camera you are ready to chime in. I've given you credit. If you have a desire to take a picture of a nonmoving object you will get a stunning picture. Most everything else is going to be a problem. So, one can ignore it, or talk about it until hopefully its adjusted.
And before you tell me it doesn't matter if we talk about it here or not, because its simply a forum that moto won't see, then why do the soak test brigade come out in full force anytime lollipop is mentioned? I guess its only spies looking out for that and nothing else.