I'm just not liking the whole 3D thing. Seems like a gimmick to me. Are there any rumors of any other dual-core phones coming to Sprint???
I'm definitely not convinced of 3D's usefulness or its longevity, particularly on smaller screens, but I definitely think the Evo 3D is a competitor for top dog this year. It may be edged out by the Galaxy S II, but with a dual-core Snapdragon, 1GB of RAM and a 960x540 Super LCD it definitely has serious potential to rule the year.Anyone else think the EVO 3D is not a gimmick? I am actually looking forward to it, unlike a few folks who have dismissed it without seeing it.
Thanks.
The 1GB of RAM and a physical camera button make the EVO 3D the better buy over the Sensation, for me. Personally, I'm deciding between the Galaxy S II and the Evo 3D.
Honestly, as a current owner of an HTC Evo, I almost feel horrible for saying this, but I'm starting to lean towards the Galaxy S II when it comes on Sprint, ESPECIALLY if it has the same spacious keyboard (if not bigger) as the Epic.
I'm actually in the exact same boat as you. On one hand, the Evo 3D has a higher resolution screen and a physical camera button. But on the other hand, it appears that the Galaxy S II has a better processor, MUCH better screen, and a MUCH better camera (this is a 1080p sample shot with it: YouTube - Samsung I9100 Galaxy S II 1080p video sample)
Honestly, as a current owner of an HTC Evo, I almost feel horrible for saying this, but I'm starting to lean towards the Galaxy S II when it comes on Sprint, ESPECIALLY if it has the same spacious keyboard (if not bigger) as the Epic.
Is Sprint actually going to have one though? The below article from CNET quotes Samsung as saying:
"it currently has no plans for a CDMA version of the phone at this time."
Next-gen Samsung Galaxy S II unveiled | Mobile World Congress - CNET Reviews
@linzgeneral The qHD is all that great to be honest. Yes, its defiantly an upgrade over the Evo 4G's display, but not by a huge margin. The qHD is pentile, compared to the Super Amoled Plus which has little to none. Then you couple that with the 'popping' colors on Amoled tech, you have one gorgeous display. The display on the Galaxy S II would translate to being much more crisp than the one on the Evo 3D. Just because the Evo 3D has more pixels, doesn't mean it'll be any better. When the Droid Charge launches, try to compare it with the Atrix 4G and you'll see what I'm talking about. You'll be surprised with the results. On a related note, the Evo 3D has a Cortex A8 processor vs the Galaxy S2's Cortex A9.
With that said, I'd take the Galaxy S2 over the Evo 3D unless you just have to have Sense.
You know, I just realized if the s2 for sprint has a keyboard, it will be the first qwerty slider that has a 4.3 inch screen (or 4.27 if you want to go technical)!
Just like the Epic 4g is the 1st 4 inch slider
And put.me on the list for Epic 4g 2. I'm also excited to find out gingerbread was confirmed for the Epic 4g