Kelly Kearns
Well-known member
No only not helpful, that doesn't make much sense.Jennifer is not a helpful person, is she?
No only not helpful, that doesn't make much sense.Jennifer is not a helpful person, is she?
No only not helpful, that doesn't make much sense.
Sprint is still selling the Note 7. Just took this screen shot. Interestingly, it is at the bottom of the phone list and not at the top as they promoted it before. This is the best reason to have removable batteries in phones. Replacing a battery is a much cheaper option for Samsung than replacing a phone. Maybe this will open their eyes.
View attachment 238228
This is what Verizon just told me
You: Samsung announced a voluntary recall of the Galaxy Note7 in response to an issue with the device’s battery. Because customer safety is our top priority, Verizon has stopped selling the Galaxy Note7. Additionally, through September 30, 2016, we are waiving the restocking fee for any customers who purchased a Galaxy Note7 and wish to return or exchange it.
You: What if i am past the 14 day return period?
Jennifer: You would need to buy a new device at retail value, or if it is a damage, you would need to call the phones company like apple or sony, and have them fix the problem through the warranty
Jennifer: If you call customer service, they may help you.
We are still waiting on more info to be released. This is going to be one of those patience times today I think.Who are we supposed to go if we want to get this taken care of? The retail outlet we purchase from or carrier (sam's club/vz for me)?
We are still waiting on more info to be released. This is going to be one of those patience times today I think.
there have been issues with Iphones having similar problems and they never issued a recall. Why with Samsung does this blow up so big but with Apple the media doesn't say much and it's brushed under the rug?
To be fair, Apple never had to recall every single phone due to a severe safety issue.
there have been issues with Iphones having similar problems and they never issued a recall. Why with Samsung does this blow up so big but with Apple the media doesn't say much and it's brushed under the rug?
Regardless of the percentage of problems reported or those who will ignore the recall because they don't feel like it's a problem Samsung has put customers safety over profits. You don't see this much anymore. Some recalls take lawsuits and government intervention because large corporations are loath to admit wrongdoing of any kind. I find it rather amazing that Samsung is doing this of their own free will so soon after release.
If you notice, some of the exploded phones had ruined screens. A replaceable battery wouldn't have helped. Also if only the battery exploded, who knows what internal damage there would have been. Sure they could do a wide battery replacement on undamaged phones for those types of phones, but you would still be without a phone because you sent the battery back, until a new battery arrived. We don't know how long it will be until new Note 7's will be issued to those returning them (so for people like me who waited, I may have to wait even longer). So the same time frame would be with a replaceable battery.This is the best reason to have removable batteries in phones. Replacing a battery is a much cheaper option for Samsung than replacing a phone. Maybe this will open their eyes.